Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture

, Volume 33, Issue 3, pp 297–301 | Cite as

Embryo rescue inVicia faba andVicia narbonensis

  • Theano B. Lazaridou
  • Demetrios G. Roupakias
  • Athanasios S. Economou
General Papers

Abstract

Embryo rescue in twoVicia faba L. cultivars (‘Polycarpe’ and ‘A-107’) and oneV. narbonensis L. population (A-202) was studied under a 22 ± 2°C/ 16 ± 1° day/night temperature regime. Very young ovules (1.0–1.8 mm long) cultured, in-ovule, on five liquid media remained green for a longer period of time on modified B5, modified Murashige and Skoog and modified Beasley and Ting media than on modified Phillips and Collins and modified Bourgin and Nitsch media. However, no embryo growth or embryo germination was observed. In-ovule culture of older ovules, 6 and 8 days forV. narbonensis and 10 and 14 days forV. faba, on modified B5 liquid medium allowed 6-day-oldV. narbonensis and 14-day-oldV. faba embryos to be rescued. Finally, culture of whole pods of the two species resulted in the rescue of even younger embryos. Thus, plantlets were obtained from as young as 4-day-oldV. narbonensis pods and 11-day-oldV. faba pods.

Key words

embryo culture in-ovule culture pod culture 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Cubero JI (1982) Interspecific hybridization in Vicia. In: Hawtin G & Webb C (Eds) Faba Bean Improvement (pp 91–108). Icarda. IFAD Nile Valley Project, Martinus Nijhoff, The HagueGoogle Scholar
  2. Lazaridou TB (1991) Interspecific hybridization betweenVicia faba andV. narbonensis. PhD Thesis submitted at the University of Thessaloniki, GreeceGoogle Scholar
  3. McCoy TJ & Smith LY (1986) Interspecific hybridization of perennialMedicago species using ovule-embryo culture. Theor. Appl. Genet. 71: 772–783CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Mok DWS, Mok MC & Rabakoarihanta A (1978) Interspecific hybridization ofPhaseolus vulgaris withP. lunatus andP. acutifolius. Theor. Appl. Genet. 52: 209–215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Newell CA & Hymowitz T (1982) Successful wide hybridization between the soybean and a wild perennial relative,G. tomentella Hayata. Crop Sci. 22: 1062–1065Google Scholar
  6. Ramsay G, Pickersgill B, Jones JK, Hammond L & Stewart MH (1984) Barriers to interspecific hybridization betweenV. faba and other species of Section Faba. In: Hebblethwaite PD, Dawkins TCK, Heath MC & Lockwood G (Eds)Vicia faba: Agronomy, Physiology and Breeding (pp 201–208). Martinus Nijhoff/Dr W. Junk, The HagueGoogle Scholar
  7. Roupakias DG (1986) Interspecific hybridization betweenVicia faba (L.) andVicia narbonensis (L.): Early pod growth and embryo-sac development. Euphytica 35: 175–183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Roupakias DG & Tai W (1985) Interspecific hybridization in the genusVicia under controlled environment. Z. Pflanzenzüchtg. 96: 177–180Google Scholar
  9. Stewart JM & Hsu CL (1977) In ovule embryo culture and seedling development of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). Planta 137: 113–117CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • Theano B. Lazaridou
    • 1
  • Demetrios G. Roupakias
    • 1
  • Athanasios S. Economou
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Genetics and Plant BreedingAristotelian UniversityThessalonikiGreece
  2. 2.Department of HorticultureAristotelian UniversityThessalonikiGreece

Personalised recommendations