Extremely cold positrons for antihydrogen production
- 22 Downloads
- 5 Citations
Abstract
The storage of extremely cold (4 K) antiprotons in a Penning trap is an important step toward the creation and study of cold antihydrogen. The other required ingredient, the largest possible number of comparably cold positrons, is still lacking. These would be recombined in a high vacuum with the trapped antiprotons, already stored at a pressure below 5×10−17 Torr, thereby avoiding annihilation of the antihydrogen atoms before they can be used in high accuracy measurements or in controlled collision experiments. In an exploratory experiment, positrons from a 18 mCi22Na source follow fringing field lines of a 6 T superconducting solenoid through tiny apertures in the electrodes of a Penning trap to strike a tungsten (reflection) moderator. The positron beam is chopped mechanically and a lock-in directly detects a positron current of 2.5×106e+/s on the moderator. The use of a moderator, unlike an earlier experiment in which < 100 positrons were confined in vacuum, should greatly increase the number of positrons trapped in high vacuum.
Keywords
Tungsten Accuracy Measurement Field Line High Vacuum AntihydrogenPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- [1]G. Gabrielse, X. Fei, K. Helmerson, S.L. Rolston, R.L. Tjoelker, T.A. Trainor, H. Kalinowsky, J. Hass and W. Kells, Phys. Rev. Lett. 57 (1986) 2504.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
- [2]G. Gabrielse, X. Fei, L.A. Orozco, S.L. Rolston, R.L. Tjoelker, T.A. Trainor, J. Hass, H. Kalinowsky and W. Kells, Phys. Rev. A40 (1989) 481.ADSGoogle Scholar
- [3]G. Gabrelse, X. Fei, L.A. Orozco, R.L. Tjoelker, J. Hass, H. Kalinowsky, T.A. Trainor and W. Kells, Phys. Rev. Lett. 63 (1989) 1360.ADSGoogle Scholar
- [4]G. Gabrielse, X. Fei, L.A. Orozco, R.L. Tjoelker, J. Hass, H. Kalinowsky, T.A. Trainor and W. Kells, Phys. Rev. Lett. 65 (1990) 1317.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
- [5]G. Gabrielse, S.L. Rolston and L. Haarsma, Phys. Lett. A129 (1988) 38.ADSGoogle Scholar
- [6]G. Gabrielse, in:Fundamental Symmetries, eds. P. Bloch, P. Pavlopoulos and R. Klapisch (Plenum Press, New York, 1987) p. 59.Google Scholar
- [7]H.F. Hess, G.P. Kochanski, J.M. Doyle, N. Masuhara, D. Kleppner and T.J. Greytak, Phys. Rev. Lett. 59 (1987) 672.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
- [8]T.W. Hänsch, Hyp. Int., this volume.Google Scholar
- [9]G. Gabrielse, Hyp. Int. 44 (1988) 349.Google Scholar
- [10]J. Walraven and C. Shlyapnikov, Hyp. Int., this volume.Google Scholar
- [11]G. Gabrielse and B. Brown, in:The Hydrogen Atom, eds. G.F. Bassani, M. Ingscio and T.W. Hänsch (Springer, Berlin, 1989) p. 196.Google Scholar
- [12]P.B. Schwinberg, R.S. Van Dyck Jr. and H.G. Dehmelt, Phys. Lett. A81 (1981) 119; R.S. Van Dyck Jr., private communication.ADSGoogle Scholar
- [13]C.M. Surko, M. Leventhal and A. Passner, Phys. Rev. Lett. 62 (1989) 901; T.J. Murphy and C.M. Surko, Phys. Rev. Lett. 67 (1991) 2954.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
- [14]B.L. Brown, W.S. Crane and A.P. Mills Jr., Appl. Phys. Lett. 48 (1986) 739.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
- [15]P.J. Schultz and K.G. Lynn, Rev. Mod. Phys. 60 (1988) 701.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
- [16]D.T. Britton, P.A. Huttunen, J. Mäkinen, E. Soininen and A. Vehanen, Phys. Rev. Lett. 62 (1989) 2413.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
- [17]L.S. Brown and G. Gabrielse, Rev. Mod. Phys. 58 (1986) 233.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
- [18]A.P. Mills Jr. and E.M. Gullikson, Appl. Phys. Lett. 49 (1986) 1121.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
- [19]R. Howell et al. and K. Lynn et al., in:Positron Scattering in Gases, eds. J.W. Humberston and M.R.C. McDowell (Plenum Press, New York, 1983) p. 155.Google Scholar