Atlantic Economic Journal

, Volume 5, Issue 1, pp 22–28 | Cite as

Toward compromise on tenure

  • Martin Bronfenbrenner
Articles

Keywords

International Economic Public Finance 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    Van Alstyne, “Tenure: A Summary, Explanation, and ‘Defense,’”AAUP Bulletin, Autumn 1971.Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    American Council on Education,Faculty Tenure, Washington, D.C., 1972.Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    Howard K. Beale,History of Freedom of Teaching in American Schools, New York: Scribners, 1941.Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    _____,Are American Teachers Free?, New York: Scribners, 1936.Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    Martin Bronfenbrenner, “If I were theMombu-Daijin,”Aoyama Keizai Ronshu, January 1974.Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    Fred M. Hechinger, “Loss of Tenure: Return of a Nightmare,”Saturday Review, May 31, 1975.Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    Richard Hofstadter and Walter P. Metzger,The Development of Academic Freedom in the United States, New York: Columbia University Press, 1955.Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    Fritz Machlup, “In Defense of Academic Tenure,”AAUP Bulletin, Spring 1964.Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    Robert Nisbet, “The Permanent Professors,”Public Interest, Fall 1965.Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    _____, “The Future of Tenure,”Change, April 1973.Google Scholar
  11. [11]
    University of Utah Commission to Study Tenure,Report, May 1971.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Atlantic Economic Society 1977

Authors and Affiliations

  • Martin Bronfenbrenner
    • 1
  1. 1.Duke UniversityUSA

Personalised recommendations