Advertisement

Self-efficacy for self-regulated learning, academic self-efficacy, and internet self-efficacy in web-based instruction

  • Young-Ju Joo
  • Mimi Bong
  • Ha-Jeen Choi
Research

Abstract

Effects of student motivation on performance in Web-based instruction (WBI) were examined. In particular, applicability of the self-efficacy theory to WBI contexts was tested. A total of 152 junior high school students in Seoul, Korea, participated in WBI during regular science classes. Participants completed motivational surveys before the onset of WBI and took the written and search tests at the end of WBI. Path analyses revealed that students' self-efficacy for self-regulated learning positively related to their academic self-efficacy, strategy use, and Internet self-efficacy. Academic self-efficacy predicted students' performance on the written test, which comprised problems on topics covered during the previous WBI sessions. Students' scores on the WBI search test were significantly and positively predicted by their self-efficacy in using the Internet. More interesting, students' academic self-efficacy beliefs were not able to predict their search test performance, whereas students' Internet self-efficacy beliefs were not able to predict their written test performance.

Keywords

High School Test Performance High School Student Educational Technology Path Analysis 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Al-Khaldi, M.A., & Al-Jabri, I.M. (1998). The relationship of attitudes to computer utilization: New evidence from a developing nation.Computers in Human Behavior, 14, 23–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change.Psychological Review, 84, 191–215.Google Scholar
  3. Bandura, A. (1997).Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.Google Scholar
  4. Bandura, A., & Schunk, D.H. (1981). Cultivating competence, self-efficacy, and intrinsic interest through proximal self-motivation.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41, 586–598.Google Scholar
  5. Betz, N.E., & Hackett, G. (1981). The relationship of career-related self-efficacy expectations to perceived career options in college women and men.Journal of Counseling Psychology, 28, 399–410.Google Scholar
  6. Bong, M. (1997, March).Congruence of measurement specificity on relations between academic self-efficacy, effort, and achievement indexes. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL.Google Scholar
  7. Bong, M. (1999).Role of self-efficacy and task-value in predicting college students' course performance and future enrollment intentions. Manuscript submitted for publication.Google Scholar
  8. Bong, M., & Clark, R.E. (in press). Comparison between self-concept and self-efficacy in academic motivation research.Educational Psychologist.Google Scholar
  9. Chen, M. (1986). Gender and computers: The beneficial effects of experience on attitudes.Journal of Educational Computing Research, 2(3), 265–282.Google Scholar
  10. Cohen, R.J., Montague, P., Nathanson, L.S., & Swerdlik, M.E. (1988).Psychological testing: An introduction to tests & measurement. Mountain View, CA: Mayfield.Google Scholar
  11. Ertmer, P.A., Evenbeck, E., Cennamo, K.S., & Lehman, J.D. (1994). Enhancing self-efficacy for computer technologies through the use of positive classroom experience.Educational Technology Research and Development, 42(3), 45–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fetterman, D.M. (1998). Webs of meaning: Computer and Internet resources for educational research and instruction.Educational Researcher, 27(3), 22–30.Google Scholar
  13. Hill, J.R., & Hannafin, M.J. (1997). Cognitive strategies and learning from the World Wide Web.Educational Technology Research and Development, 45(4), 37–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Horn, C., Bruning, R., Schraw, G., Curry, E., & Katkanan, C. (1993). Paths to success in the college classroom.Contemporary Educational Psychology, 18, 464–478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Howard-Rose, D., & Winne, P.H. (1993). Measuring component and sets of cognitive processes in self-regulated learning.Journal of Educational Psychology, 85, 591–604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Joo, Y.J., Lee, K.H., & Bong, M. (1998).Strategies for enhancing information literacy of female students. Seoul, Korea: Ewha Womans University.Google Scholar
  17. Levine, T., & Donitsa-Schmidt, S. (1998). Computer use, confidence, attitudes, and knowledge: A causal analysis.Computers in Human Behavior, 14, 125–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Multon, K.D., Brown, S.D., & Lent, R.W. (1991). Relation of self-efficacy beliefs to academic outcomes: A meta-analytic investigation.Journal of Counseling Psychology, 38, 30–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Murphy, C.A., Coover, D., & Owen, S.V. (1989). Development and validation of the Computer Self-Efficacy scale.Educational and Psychological Measurement, 49, 893–899.Google Scholar
  20. Owston, R.D. (1997). The World Wide Web: A technology to enhance teaching and learning?Educational Researcher, 26(2), 27–33.Google Scholar
  21. Pajares, F. (1996). Self-efficacy beliefs in academic settings.Review of Educational Research, 66, 543–578.Google Scholar
  22. Pajares, F., & Miller, M.D. (1994). Role of self-efficacy and self-concept beliefs in mathematical problem solving: A path analysis.Journal of Educational Psychology, 86, 193–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Pajares, F., & Miller, M.D. (1995). Mathematics self-efficacy and mathematics performances: The need for specificity of assessment.Journal of Counseling Psychology, 42, 190–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Pedhazur, E.J. (1982).Multiple regression in behavioral research: Explanation and prediction (2nd ed.). Fort Worth, TX: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
  25. Pintrich, P.R., & De Groot, E.V. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance.Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 33–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Pokay, P., & Blumenfeld, P.C. (1990). Predicting achievement early and late in the semester: The role of motivation and use of learning strategies.Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 41–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Salomon, G. (1984). Television is ‘easy’ and print is ‘tough’: The differential investment of mental effort in learning as a function of perceptions and attitudes.Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 647–658.Google Scholar
  28. Santiago, R.W., & Okey, J.R. (1992). The effects of advisement and locus of control on achievement in learner-controlled instruction.Journal of Computer-Based Instruction, 19, 47–53.Google Scholar
  29. Schunk, D.H. (1982). Effects of effort attributional feedback on children's perceived self-efficacy and achievement.Journal of Educational Psychology, 74, 548–556.Google Scholar
  30. Schunk, D.H. (1983). Ability versus effort attributional feedback: Differential effects on self-efficacy and achievement.Journal of Educational Psychology, 75, 848–856.Google Scholar
  31. Schunk, D.H. (1984). Sequential attributional feedback and children's achievement behaviors.Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 1159–1169.Google Scholar
  32. Schunk, D.H. (1991). Self-efficacy and academic motivation.Educational Psychologist, 26, 207–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Windschitl, M. (1998). The WWW and classroom research: What path should we take?Educational Researcher, 27(1), 28–33.Google Scholar
  34. Young, J.D. (1996). The effect of self-regulated learning strategies on performance in learner controlled computer-based instruction.Educational Technology Research and Development, 44(2), 17–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Zimmerman, B.J. (1995). Self-efficacy and educational development. In A. Bandura (Ed.),Self-efficacy in changing societies (pp. 202–231). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  36. Zimmerman, B.J., & Bandura, A. (1994). Impact of self-regulatory influences on writing course attainment.American Educational Research Journal, 31, 845–862.Google Scholar
  37. Zimmerman, B.J., Bandura, A., & Martinez-Pons, M. (1992). Self-motivation for academic attainment: The role of self-efficacy beliefs and personal goal setting.American Educational Research Journal, 29, 663–676.Google Scholar
  38. Zimmerman, B.J., & Martinez-Pons, M. (1988). Construct validation of a strategy model of student self-regulated learning.Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 284–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Zimmerman, B.J., & Martinez-Pons, M. (1990). Student differences in self-regulated learning: Relating grade, sex, and giftedness to self-efficacy and strategy use.Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 51–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© the Association for Educational Communications and Technology 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Educational Technology, School of EducationEwha Womans UniversitySeoulKorea

Personalised recommendations