aequationes mathematicae

, Volume 32, Issue 1, pp 74–86

Further evidence against independence preservation in expert judgement synthesis

  • Christian Genest
  • Carl G. Wagner
Research Papers

DOI: 10.1007/BF02311302

Cite this article as:
Genest, C. & Wagner, C.G. Aeq. Math. (1987) 32: 74. doi:10.1007/BF02311302

Abstract

When a decision maker chooses to form his/her own probability distribution by combining the opinions of a number of experts, it is sometimes recommended that he/she should do so in such a way as to preserve any form of expert agreement regarding the independence of the events of interest. In this paper, we argue against this recommendation. We show that for those probability spaces which contain at least five points, a large class of seemingly reasonable combination methods excludes all independence preserving formulas except those which pick a single expert. In the case where at most four alternatives are present, the same conditions admit a richer variety of non-dictatorial methods which we also characterize. In the discussion, we give our reasons for rejecting independence preservation in expert judgement synthesis.

AMS (1980) subject classification

Primary 62A99 62C05 Secondary 39B40 

Copyright information

© Birkhäuser Verlag 1987

Authors and Affiliations

  • Christian Genest
    • 1
    • 2
  • Carl G. Wagner
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Statistics and Actuarial ScienceUniversity of WaterlooWaterlooCanada
  2. 2.Department of MathematicsUniversity of TennesseeKnoxvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations