Advertisement

Chromatographia

, Volume 23, Issue 7, pp 481–486 | Cite as

Prediction of the net retention volumes in gas chromatography using porous polymers coated with different stationary phases

  • D. Barceló
  • M. T. Galcerán
  • L. Eek
Originals

Summary

A new expression which permits the prediction of the net retention volumes in gas chromatography with column packings of coated porous polymers is reported. The porous polymers Chromosorb 101 and Chromosorb 102 were used as supports and squalane, Ethofat and Carbowax 20M as stationary phases at three different column temperatures of 80°C, 100°C and 150°C. Several organic compounds of various polarity were used as test compounds and the net retention volumes, VNtheor, have been calculated according to this new expression. The VNtheor values were compared with the experimental net retention volumes, VNexp, and it was found that the difference between these two values is dependent on the type of compound and column packing. Nevertheless, the elution order could be predicted in most cases.

Key words

Gas chromatography Prediction of retention volume Porous polymers coated with liquid phases 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    H. Masuda, S. Mihara, J. Chromatog.366, 373 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    Z. Suprynowicz, W. M. Buda, M. Mardarowicz, A. Patrikijew, J. Chromatog.333, 11 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    A. Patrykiejew, B. Gawdzik, J. Chromatog.365, 251 (1986).Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    G. Castello, G. D'Amato, J. Chromatog.366, 51 (1986).Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    D. Barceló, M. T. Galcerán, L. Eek, Chromatographia12, 72 (1979).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    D. Barceló, M. T. Calcerán, L. Eek, Chromatographia14, 1 (1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    D. Barceló, M. T. Galcerán, L. Eek, Chromatographia21, 8 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    D. Barceló, M. T. Galcerán, L. Eek, Chromatographia21, 16 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    D. Barceló, M. T. Galcerán, L. Eek, in “Chromatography, th State of the Art”,H. Kalasz andL. S. Ettre (eds) Pub. H. Hung. Acad. Sci. (1984).Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    D. Barceló, L. Eek, in Analytical Techniques in environment chemistry, ed.J. Albaigés, Pergamon Press, Oxford (1980) p. 335Google Scholar
  11. [11]
    R. Tijsen, H. A. H. Billiet, P. J. Shoenmakers, J. Chromato122, 185 (1976).Google Scholar
  12. [12]
    C. M. Hansen, Ind. Eng. Chem. Prod. Res. Develop.8, (1976).Google Scholar
  13. [13]
    A. F. Barton, Chem. Rev.75, 731 (1975).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. [14]
    W. Burns, S. J. Hawkes, J. Chromatog. Sci.15, 185 (1977).Google Scholar
  15. [15]
    B. L. Karger, L. R. Snyder, C. Eon, J. Chromatog.125, 7 (1976).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. [16]
    B. L. Karger, L. R. Snyder, C. Eon, Anal. Chem.50, 212 (1978).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. [17]
    S. Coppi, A. Betti, J. Chromatog.300, 55 (1985).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Friedr. Vieweg & Sohn Verlagsgesellschaft mbH 1987

Authors and Affiliations

  • D. Barceló
    • 1
  • M. T. Galcerán
    • 1
  • L. Eek
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Analytical ChemistryUniversity of BarcelonaBarcelonaSpain
  2. 2.Derivados Forestales S. A.BarcelonaSpain

Personalised recommendations