Journal of Contemporary Psychotherapy

, Volume 26, Issue 3, pp 287–294

The omnipotent clinician: A potential source of iatrogenesis

  • Robert S. Pepper
Article

Abstract

Clinicians who do not acknowledge their delusions of omnipotence can do harm to their patients when these feelings are acted out in the treatment. In breaking the frame of the therapy these clinicians inadvertently create the potential for iatrogenic treatment reactions. When practitioners knowingly practiced outside the boundaries of the established wisdom and theoretical knowledge of the profession, an ethical problem arises. Under such conditions, it can be said that the practitioner consciously jeopardize his patients emotional, and at time, physical well-being. Justifying their behavior, some therapists ironically assert that they are morally superior to others who adhere to the rules of treatment. As Langs note, when boundaries are blurred therapists often unconsciously dumps their pathology into the patient who must then struggle to contain the toxic feelings of both parties. Resolution to this type of countertransference may come through greater awareness of the therapeutic community at large as to the dangers of acting out feelings of omnipotence in the treatment.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. American Psychological Association (1992).The Ethical Code for Psychologists. Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  2. Freud, S. (1910).The future prospects of psycho-analytic therapy. Standard edition.Google Scholar
  3. Langs, R. (1982).The psychotherapeutic conspiracy. New York: Jason Aronson.Google Scholar
  4. Langs, R. (1989).Rating your own therapist. New York: Jason Aronson.Google Scholar
  5. Pepper, R. (1990). When Transference Isn't Transference: Iatrogenesis of Multiple Role Relations.Journal of Contemporary Psychotherapy.20, 141–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Pepper, R. (1991). The Senior Therapist's Grandiosity: Clinical and Ethical Consequences of Merging Multiple RolesJournal of Contemporary Psychotherapy, 21, 63–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Roazen, P. (1974).Freud and his followers. New York: Meridian. Temerlin, M. & Temerlin, J. (1982). Psychotherapy Cults: An iatrogenic perversion.Psychotherapy, 40, 131–140.Google Scholar
  8. Weinberg, G. (1990).The taboo scarf, New York: St. Martin Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Human Sciences Press, Inc. 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robert S. Pepper
    • 1
  1. 1.Forest Hills

Personalised recommendations