Annals of Surgical Oncology

, Volume 2, Issue 3, pp 221–227 | Cite as

Radical and local excisional methods of sphincter-sparing surgery after high-dose radiation for cancer of the distal 3 cm of the rectum

  • J. P. Bannon
  • Gerald J. Marks
  • Mohammed Mohiuddin
  • Jan Rakinic
  • Jian Nong-Zhou
  • Deborah Nagle
Original Articles


Background: Despite conventional attitudes that interdict sphincter-preservation surgery (SPS) for cancers arising in the terminal 3 cm of rectum, we have selectively employed high-dose preoperative external radiation (HDPER) and either radical or local excisional SPS techniques for rectal cancer arising between the 0.5 and 3 cm levels above the anorectal ring. We have reported a preliminary experience with HDPER and full-thickness local excision (FTLE) and three different methods of radical SPS. We now describe our experience with a single method of radical excision, transanal abdominal transanal proctosigmoidectomy with coloanal anastomosis (TATA) and FTLE in conjunction with HDPER for cancers of the distal 3 cm of rectum based on specific guidelines.

Methods: Since 1984, 109 patients with cancers at or below the 3 cm level have been treated with HDPER in doses of 4,500–7,000 cGy and a sphincter-preserving radical or local excision method in a prospective rectal cancer management program. Sixty-five patients (group A) underwent transanal abdominal transanal radical proctosigmoidectomy with coloanal anastomosis (TATA) and 44 patients (group B) underwent FTLE.

Results: There was one death (1%). Mean follow-up was 40 months. Local recurrence rates for groups A and B were 9 and 14%, respectively. Kaplan-Meier 5-year actuarial survival was 85 and 90% for groups A and B, respectively, and 87% collectively.

Conclusion: Experience with 109 patients with cancers of the distal 3 cm of rectum indicates that SPS can be accomplished by either radical or local excisional methods with acceptable local control and survival if HDPER and strict selection guidelines are employed.


Rectal Cancer Local Excision Local Recurrence Rate Coloanal Anastomosis Radical Excision 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Marks GJ, Mohiuddin M. The reality of radical sphincter preservation surgery for cancers of the distal 3 cm of rectum following high dose radiation.Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1993;27:779–83.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Marks G, Mohiuddin M, Masoni L, Montori A. High dose preoperative radiation therapy as the key to extending sphincter-preservation surgery for cancer of the distal rectum.Surgical Oncology Clinics of North America 1992;1:71–86.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Marks GJ, Mohiuddin M, Masoni L, Pecchioli L. High dose preoperative radiation and full thickness local excision.Dis Col Rectum 1990;33:735–9.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Mohiuddin M, Ahmad N, Marks G. A selective approach to adjunctive therapy for cancer of the rectum.Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1993;27:765–72.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Murdoch MG, Kramer S. Cobalt 60 therapy in the management of perineal recurrence from carcinoma of the rectum and colon.Am J Roentgenol 1964;9:149–54.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Marks G, Mohiuddin M, Borenstein B. Preoperative radiation therapy and sphincter preservation by the combined abdominotranssacral technique for selected rectal cancers.Dis Colon Rectum 1985;28:565–71.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Rothenberger D. Wong D. Abdominoperineal resection for adenocarcinoma of the low rectum.World J Surg 1992;16:478–85.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Philipshen SJ, Heilweil M, Quan SHQ, Sternberg SS, Enker WE. Pattern of pelvic recurrence following definitive resections of rectal cancer.Cancer 1984;53:1354–62.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Athlin L, Bengtsson N, Stenling R. Local recurrence and survival after radical resection of rectal carcinoma.Carcinoma Acta Chir Scand 1988;154:225–9.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Friedmann P, Garb J, Park W, Stark A, DeConti R, Chabot R, Pace O. Survival following moderate-dose preoperative radiation therapy for carcinoma of the rectum.Cancer 1985;55:967–73.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Menhenhall WM, Million R, Bland K, Pfaff W, Copeland E. Preoperative radiation therapy for clinically resectable adenocarcinoma of the rectum.Ann Surg 1985;202:215–21.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Krook JE, Moertel CG, Gunderson LL, et al. Effective surgical adjuvant therapy for high risk rectal carcinoma.N Engl J Med 1991;324:709–15.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Killingback M. Local excision of carcinoma of the rectum: indications.World J Surg 1992;16:437–46.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Biggers O, Beart R, Ilstrup MS. Local excision of rectal cancer.Dis Colon Rectum 1986;29:374–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Salvati EP, Rubin RJ, Eisenstat TE, Siemons G, Mangione JS. Electrocoagulation of selected carcinoma of the rectum.Surgery 1988;166:393–6.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Brodsky J, Richard G, Cohen A, Minsky B. Variables correlated with the risk of lymph node metastasis in early rectal cancer.Cancer 1992;69:322–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Society of Surgical Oncology, Inc 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. P. Bannon
    • 1
  • Gerald J. Marks
    • 1
  • Mohammed Mohiuddin
    • 2
  • Jan Rakinic
    • 1
  • Jian Nong-Zhou
    • 3
  • Deborah Nagle
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Surgery, Division of Colorectal Surgery, The Comprehensive Rectal Cancer CenterThomas Jefferson University HospitalPhiladelphia
  2. 2.Department of Radiation MedicineUniversity of KentuckyLexington
  3. 3.Department of General SurgeryJiangsu Institute of Cancer ResearchNanjingP.R. China

Personalised recommendations