Atlantic Economic Journal

, Volume 16, Issue 2, pp 12–21 | Cite as

Micro-foundations, Ad Hocery, and Keynesian theory

  • Kurt W. Rothschild


International Economic Public Finance Keynesian Theory 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. G. G. Cain, “The Challenge of Segmented Labor Market Theories to Orthodox Theory: A Survey,”Journal of Economic Literature, 14, 1976, pp. 1215–57.Google Scholar
  2. V. Chick,Macroeconomics after Keynes. A Reconsideration of the General Theory, Oxford, 1983.Google Scholar
  3. R. Clower, “Reflections on the Keynesian Perplex,” Zeitschrift für Nationalökonomie, 35, 1975, pp. 1–24.Google Scholar
  4. J. Elster,Sour Grapes. Studies in the Subversion of Rationality, Cambridge, 1985.Google Scholar
  5. P. Feyerabend,Against Method. Outline of an Anarchistic Theory of Knowledge, London, 1975.Google Scholar
  6. F. H. Hahn, “Keynesian Economics and General Equilibrium Theory: Reflections on Some Current Debates,” inThe Microeconomic Foundations of Macroeconomics, Harcourt, ed., 1977, pp. 25–40.Google Scholar
  7. G. C. Harcourt, ed.,The Microeconomic Foundations of Macroeconomics, London, 1977.Google Scholar
  8. J. M. Keynes,The General Theory of Employment, Interest, and Money, London, 1936.Google Scholar
  9. J. Kornai,Antiequilibrium. On Economic Systems Theory and the Tasks of Research, Amsterdam, 1971.Google Scholar
  10. J. Kregel, “Economic Methodology in the Face of Uncertainty: The Modelling Methods of Keynes and the Post-Keynesians,”Economic Journal, 86, 1976, pp. 209–25.Google Scholar
  11. T. Lawson and H. Pesaran, eds.,Keynes' Economics: Methodological Issues, London, 1985.Google Scholar
  12. D. N. McCloskey,The Rhetoric of Economics, Brighton, 1985.Google Scholar
  13. S. Moss,Markets and Macroeconomics. Macroeconomic Implications of Rational Individual Behaviour, Oxford, 1984.Google Scholar
  14. W. Salant, “Keynes and the Modern World: A Review Article,”Journal of Economic Literature, 23, 1985, pp. 1176–85.Google Scholar
  15. G. Schanz, “Ökonomische Theorie als sozialwissenschaftliches Paradigma?,”Soziale Welt, Heft 3, 1979, pp. 257–74.Google Scholar
  16. G. L. S. Shackle,Keynesian Kaleidics, Edinburgh, 1974.Google Scholar
  17. M. Shubik, “The General Equilibrium Model is Incomplete and Not Adequate for the Reconciliation of Micro- and Macroeconomic Theory,”Kyklos, 28, 1975, pp. 545–73.Google Scholar
  18. E. Streissler, “What Kind of Microeconomic Foundations of Macroeconomics are Necessary?,” inThe Microeconomic Foundations of Macroeconomics, Harcourt, ed., 1977, pp. 96–128.Google Scholar
  19. D. Worswick and J. Trevithick, eds.,Keynes and the Modern World: Proceedings of the Keynes Centenary Conference, King's College, Cambridge, 1983.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Atlantic Economic Society 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kurt W. Rothschild
    • 1
  1. 1.ViennaAustria

Personalised recommendations