Advertisement

Annals of Surgical Oncology

, Volume 3, Issue 5, pp 446–452 | Cite as

Local recurrence in malignant melanoma: Long-term results of the multiinstitutional randomized surgical trial

  • Constantine P. Karakousis
  • Charles M. Balch
  • Marshall M. Urist
  • Merrick M. Ross
  • Thomas J. Smith
  • Alfred A. Bartolucci
Original Articles

Abstract

Background: In the past, radical margins of excision were prescribed for cutaneous melanoma based on preconceived notions rather than on hard clinical evidence.

Methods: In a prospective study of 742 patients with intermediate-thickness melanoma (1–4 mm), 470 patients with trunk or proximal extremity lesions were randomized into a 2-or 4-cm margin. Patients with distal extremity or head and neck lesions (n=272) received uniformly a 2-cm margin.

Results: The overall rate of local recurrence was 3.8%. This rate in the randomized portion (n=470) was 2.1% for the 2-cm margin and 2.6% for the 4-cm margin (p=0.72). A progressive increase in local recurrence rates was observed with thickness: 2.3% for lesions 1.0–2.0 mm, 4.2% for those 2.01–3.0 mm, and 11.7% for those 3.01–4.0 mm thick (p=0.001). Local recurrence occurred in 1.5% of those without ulceration and in 10.6% of those with ulceration of the primary lesion (p=0.001). The local recurrence rate was not significantly affected by the margin of resection even among the thicker or ulcerated lesions. It also was not affected significantly by the method of closure of the primary site or management of the regional nodes, or the age or gender of the patients.

Conclusions: A 2-cm margin is as effective as a 4-cm margin in local control and survival of intermediate-thickness melanomas. The local recurrence rate is significantly affected by the thickness of the primary lesion and the presence or not of ulceration.

Key Words

Melanoma Local recurrence Resection margins 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Balch CM, Urist MM, Karakousis CP, et al. Efficacy of 2-cm surgical margins for intermediate-thickness melanomas (1 to 4 mm). Results of a multi-institutional randomized surgical trial.Ann Surg 1993;218:262–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kaplan EL, Meier P. Nonparametric estimation from incomplete observations.J Am Stat Assoc 1958;53:457–86.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cox DR. Regression models and life tables.J R Stat Soc B 1971;34:187–220.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Boring CC, Squires TS, Tong T. Cancer statistics 1992.CA 1992;421:19–38.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Balch CM, Karakousis CP, Mettlin C, et al. Management of cutaneous melanoma in the United States.Surg Gynecol Obstet 1984;158:311–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Breslow A, Macht SK. Optimal size of resection margin for thin cutaneous melanoma.Surg Gynecol Obstet 1977;145:691–2.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Veronesi U, Cascinelli N, Adamus J, et al. Thin stage primary cutaneous malignant melanoma: comparison of excision with margins of 1 to 3 cm.N Engl J Med 1988;318:1159–62.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Veronesi U, Cascinelli N. Narrow excision (1-cm margin): a safe procedure for thin cutaneous melanoma.Arch Surg 1991;126:438–41.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Loree TR, Spiro RH. Cutaneous melanoma of the head and neck.Am J Surg 1989;158:388–91.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Urist MM, Balch CM. Head and neck melanoma. In: Balch CM, Houghton AN, Milton GW, Sober AJ, Soong S-J, eds.Cutaneous melanoma. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: JB Lippincott, 1992:295–301.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ames FC, Balch CM, Reintgen D. Local recurrence and their management. In: Balch CM, Houghton AN, Milton GW, Sober AJ, Soong S-J, eds.Cutaneous melanoma. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: JB Lippincott, 1992:287–94.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Society of Surgical Oncology, Inc. 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • Constantine P. Karakousis
    • 1
  • Charles M. Balch
    • 2
  • Marshall M. Urist
    • 3
  • Merrick M. Ross
    • 2
  • Thomas J. Smith
    • 5
  • Alfred A. Bartolucci
    • 4
  1. 1.From the Department of SurgeryState University of New York and Millard Fillmore HospitalBuffalo
  2. 2.Division of Surgery and Anesthesiology, Department of Surgical OncologyThe University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer CenterHouston
  3. 3.Department of SurgeryUniversity of AlabamaBirmingham
  4. 4.Department of BiostatisticsUniversity of AlabamaBirmingham
  5. 5.Department of SurgeryMorristown Memorial HospitalMorristownUSA

Personalised recommendations