Advertisement

Atlantic Economic Journal

, Volume 11, Issue 2, pp 44–51 | Cite as

Church attendance, age, and belief in the afterlife: Some additional evidence

  • Holley Ulbrich
  • Myles Wallace
Articles

Summary and Conclusions

This mixed bag of empirical evidence does not resolve the theological and econmic questions raised in conjunction with the “afterlife capital” model of church attendance, including not only afterlife but a mixture of current benefits as well, is present in all of the evidence cited. What evidence we have to offer suggests a decline in the afterlife motivation between 1973 and 1980 and a strengthening of other current consumption motives, but the afterlife motive is clearly still present in varying degrees of strength in some religious groups. What our findings do strongly suggest is that self-reported religious intensity, which undoubtedly contains elements of current consumption benefits, is a more important determinant of church attendance than belief in an afterlife.

Keywords

Empirical Evidence Important Determinant International Economic Public Finance Religious Group 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Jon P. Alston and William AlexMcIntosh, “An Assessment of the Determinants of Religious Participations,”The Sociological Quarterly, 10, Winter 1979, pp. 49–62.Google Scholar
  2. Corry Azzi and Ronald Ehrenburg, “Household Allocation of Time and Church Attendance,”Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 83, No. 1, February 1975, pp. 27–56.Google Scholar
  3. Gary Becker, “A Theory of the Allocation of Time,”The Economic Journal, No. 299, Vol. LXXV, September 1965, pp. 493–517.Google Scholar
  4. Ronald Ehrenburg, “Household Allocation of Time and Religiosity: Replication and Extension,”Journal of Political Economy, 1977, Vol. 85, No. 2, pp. 415–23.Google Scholar
  5. Laurence P. Feldman and Jacob Hornik, “The Use of Time: An Integrated Conceptual Model,”Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 7, March 1981, pp. 407–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Stan Gaede, “Religious Participation, Socioeconomic Status, and Belief-Orthodoxy,”Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 1977, 16(3), pp. 245–53.Google Scholar
  7. Reuben Gronau, “Leisure, Home Production, and Work: The Theory of Allocation of Time Revisited,”Journal of Political Economy, 1977, Vol. 85, No. 6, pp. 1099–123.Google Scholar
  8. Dean R. Hoge and Jackson W. Carroll, “Determinants, of Commitment and Participation in Suburban Protestant Churches,”Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 1978, 17(2), pp. 107–27.Google Scholar
  9. Stephen H. Long and Russell F. Settle, “Household Allocation of Time and Church Attendance: Some Additional Evidence,”Journal of Political Economy, 1977, Vol. 85, No. 2, pp. 409–13.Google Scholar
  10. John A. Menefee, “The Demand for Consumption Time: A Longitudianl Perspective,”Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 8, March 1983, pp. 391–97.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Atlantic Economic Society 1983

Authors and Affiliations

  • Holley Ulbrich
    • 1
  • Myles Wallace
    • 1
  1. 1.Clemson UniversityUSA

Personalised recommendations