Advertisement

Atlantic Economic Journal

, Volume 9, Issue 3, pp 20–33 | Cite as

The supply of labor time for mature females

  • Eric J. Solberg
Articles

Conclusions

Overall, the evidence indicates that women view their leisure time as a normal good. The responsiveness in supply to changes in asset income is small.

For females with spouse present, their time is a gross complement with respect to their spouse's time if the spouse's labor supply curve has negative slope. Simultaneously, the spouses' times appear to be net substitutes.

There is evidence in both survey years of a backward bending labor supply curve for females. While most females remain on that part of their supply curve which has positive slope, females, particularly those with no spouse present, seem to be moving toward the backward bending segment of that curve over time. It seems that both females with and without spouse present will be behaving more like their male counterparts over time.

Keywords

International Economic Labor Supply Public Finance Leisure Time Negative Slope 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Orley Ashenfelter and James Heckman, “The Estimation of Income and Substitution Effects in a Model of Family Labor Supply,”Econometrica, 42(1), January 1974, pp. 73–85.Google Scholar
  2. Farrel Black, “The Allocation of Time to Market and Non-Market Work Within a Family Unit,” Technical Report No. 114, Stanford, California: Institute for Mathematical Studies in the Social Sciences, Stanford University, November 1973.Google Scholar
  3. M. J. Boskin, “The Economics of Labor Supply,” inIncome Maintenance and Labor Supply, Cain and Watts, eds., Chicago: Rand McNally, 1973.Google Scholar
  4. G. Box and D. Cox, “An Analysis of Transformations,”Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 26, 1964, pp. 211–43.Google Scholar
  5. B. Chiswick, “An Interregional Analysis of Schooling and the Skewness of Income,” inEducation, Income, and Human Capital, W. L. Hansen, ed. New York: National Bureau of Economic Research, 1970.Google Scholar
  6. Dennis N. DeTray and David H. Greenburg, “On Estimating Sex Differences in Earnings,”Southern Economic Journal, 44(2), October 1977, pp. 348–53.Google Scholar
  7. David Gayer, “The Effects of Wages, Unearned Income and Taxes on the Supply of Labor,”International Economic Review, 18(1), February 1977, pp. 101–16.Google Scholar
  8. James Heckman, “Shadow Prices, Market Wages, and Labor Supply,”Econometrica, 42(4), July 1975, pp. 679–94.Google Scholar
  9. William R. Johnson, “Racial Wage Discrimination and Industrial Structure,”Bell Journal of Economics, 9(1), Spring 1978, pp. 70–81.Google Scholar
  10. M. C. Keeley, P. K. Robins, R. G. Speigelman, and R. W. West, “The Estimation of Labor Supply Models Using Experimental Data,”The American Economic Review, 68(5), December 1978, pp. 873–87.Google Scholar
  11. M. Kosters, “Income and Substitution Effects in a Family Labor Supply Model,” Santa Monica, California: The Rand Corporation, P-3339, December 1966.Google Scholar
  12. Mark Killingsworth, “Must a Negative Income Tax Reduce Labor Supply? A Study of the Family's Allocation of Time,”Journal of Human Resources, 11(3), 1976, pp. 354–65.Google Scholar
  13. Thomas J. Kniesner, “An Indirect Test of Complementarity in a Family Labor Supply Model,”Econometrica, 44(4), July 1976, pp. 651–69.Google Scholar
  14. J. Mincer, “Schooling, Experience, and Earnings,” mimeograph, National Bureau of Economic Research, New York, 1972.Google Scholar
  15. J. Tobin, “Estimation of Relationships for Limited Dependent Variables,”Econometrica, 26(1), January 1958, pp. 24–36.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Atlantic Economic Society 1981

Authors and Affiliations

  • Eric J. Solberg
    • 1
  1. 1.California State UniversityFullerton

Personalised recommendations