Advertisement

Humor me: A call for research

  • James L. Teslow
Research

Abstract

A review of the literature indicates that the introduction of humor as an instructional strategy in computer-based instruction (CBI) has not been studied as much as the effects of humor use in the classroom and other media. In this article humor theories are summarized, examples of humor research are provided, and perspectives on the relationships between humor, affect, motivation, information processing, and learner characteristics are discussed. Also, general guidelines for incorporating humor in CBI are suggested, and a research agenda is proposed that would support more definitive prescriptions for humor applications that reflect the affordances of modern instructional technology.

Keywords

Information Processing Educational Technology Research Agenda Instructional Strategy General Guideline 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Allen, G.W., & Clark, H.H. (1962).Literary criticism: Pope to Croce. Detroit: Wayne State University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Ames, C. (1992). Classrooms: Goals, structures, and student motivation.Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 261–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Anderson, J.R. (1985).Cognitive psychology and its implications. New York: W.H. Freeman & Co.Google Scholar
  4. Anderson, P.M. (1989). American humor, handicapism, and censorship.Journal of Reading, Writing, and Learning Disabilities International, 4(2), 79–87.Google Scholar
  5. Arnone, M.P., Grabowski, B.L., & Rynd, C.P. (1994). Curiosity as a personality variable influencing learning in a learner control lesson.Educational Technology Research and Development, 42(1), 5–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bandura, L.W. (1986).Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  7. Bereiter, C. (1991, April). Implications of connectionism for thinking about rules.Educational Researcher, 10–16.Google Scholar
  8. Berlyne, D.E. (1960).Conflict, arousal, and curiosity. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  9. Breivik, P.S., & Senn, J.A. (1993).Information literacy: Educating children for the 21st century. Bergenfield, NJ: Scholastic, Inc.Google Scholar
  10. Brierley, V. (1980). Itineraire [Itinerary].Francais dans le monde, 151, 42–44.Google Scholar
  11. Brockner, J. (1979). Self esteem, self-concept, and task performance: Replications, extensions, and possible explanations.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 447–461.Google Scholar
  12. Brody, P.J. (1982). Affecting instructional textbooks through pictures. In D.H. Jonassen (Ed.),The technology of text: Principles for structuring, designing, and displaying text (Vol. I, pp. 301–316). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.Google Scholar
  13. Brodzinsky, D.M., & Rubien, J. (1976). Humor production as a function of sex of subject, creativity, and cartoon content.Journal of consulting and Clinical Psychology, 44(4), 597–600.Google Scholar
  14. Brophy, J. (1987, October). Synthesis of research on strategies for motivating students to learn.Educational Researcher, 40–48.Google Scholar
  15. Brown, A., & Itzig, J. (1976).The introduction of humor and anxiety in academic test situations. Southern Methodist University. ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 152 783Google Scholar
  16. Brown, I. (1994). Perception of humor in cartoon riddles by adults with intellectual disabilities.Perceptual and Motor Skills, 78(3), 817.Google Scholar
  17. Brown, J.S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989, Jan–Feb). Situated cognition and the culture of learning.Educational Leadership, 32–42.Google Scholar
  18. Bryant, J., Brown, D., Silverberg, A.J., & Elliott, S.M. (1981). Effects of humorous illustrations in college textbooks.Human Communication Research, 8(1), 43–57.Google Scholar
  19. Bryant, J., Gula, J., & Zillmann, D. (1980). Humor in communication textbooks.Communication Education, 29, 110–118.Google Scholar
  20. Bryant, J., & Zillmann, D. (1988). Using humor to promote learning in the classroom.Journal of Children in Contemporary Society, 20 (1–2), 49–78.Google Scholar
  21. Callaway, R. (1990).Satire and humor in education: Selected readings. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.Google Scholar
  22. Cantor, J., & Venus, P. (1980). The effect of humor on recall of radio advertisement.Journal of Broad-casting, 24, 13–22.Google Scholar
  23. Carlson, P.A. (1990, April). Square books and round books: Cognitive implications of hypertext.Academic Computing. 16–31.Google Scholar
  24. Cazden, C.B. (1986). Classroom discourse. In M.C. Wittrock (Ed.),Handbook of research on teaching (pp. 432–463). New York: MacMillan.Google Scholar
  25. Chapman, A.J., & Crompton, P. (1978). Humorous presentations of material and presentation of humorous material: A review of humour and memory literature and two experimental studies. In M.M. Gruneberg, P.E. Morris, & R.N. Sykes (Eds.),Practical aspects of memory (pp. 84–92). London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  26. Chapman, A.J., & Foot, H.C. (1976). Introduction. In A.J. Chapman & H.C. Foot (Eds.),Humour and laughter: Theory, research and applications (pp. 1–7). London: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
  27. Civikly, J.M. (1986, June). Humor and the enjoyment of college teaching.New directions for teaching and learning No. 26 (Communicating in college classrooms), 61–70.Google Scholar
  28. Clabby, J.F., Jr. (1979). Humor as a preferred activity of the creative and humor as a facilitator of learning.Psychology: A Quarterly Journal of Human Behavior, 16(1), 5–12.Google Scholar
  29. Clark, R.E. (1994a). Media will never influence learning.Educational Technology Research and Development, 42(2), 21–29.Google Scholar
  30. Clark, R.E. (1994b). Media and method.Educational Technology Research and Development, 42(3), 7–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Clark, R.E., & Sugrue, B.M. (1991). Research on instructional media: 1978–1988. In G.J. Anglin (Ed.),Instructional technology: Past, present, and future (pp. 327–343). Englewood, CO: Libraries Unlimited.Google Scholar
  32. Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt. (1990, August–September). Anchored instruction and its relationship to situated cognition.Educational Researcher, 2–10.Google Scholar
  33. Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt. (1992). Technology and the design of generative learning environments. In T.M. Duffy & D.H. Jonassen (Eds.),Constructivism and the technology of instruction: A conversation (pp. 77–89). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  34. Cohen, P. (1995). Developing information literacy.Education Update, 37(2), 1–8.Google Scholar
  35. Coleman, J. (1992). All seriousness aside: The laughing-learning connection.International Journal of Instructional Media, 19(3), 269–276.Google Scholar
  36. Cornett, C.E. (1986). Learning through laughter: Humor in the classroom.Fastback 241. Bloomington, IN: Phi Delta Kappa.Google Scholar
  37. Cousins, N. (1979).Anatomy of an illness as perceived by the patient. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  38. Dansereau, D.F., Collins, K.W., McDonald, B.A., Holley, C.D., Garland, J.C., Diekhoff, G.M., & Evans, S.H. (1979). Development and evaluation of an effective learning strategy program.Journal of Educational Psychology, 83, 61–68.Google Scholar
  39. Dardick, G. (1990). Learning to laugh on the job.Principal, 69(5), 32–34.Google Scholar
  40. Day, H.I. (1982, May). Curisoity and the interested explorer.NSPI Journal, 19–21.Google Scholar
  41. Deci, E.L., & Ryan, R.M. (1985).Intrinsic motivation and self determination in human behavior. New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
  42. DeSousa, M.A., & Medhurst, M.J. (1982). The editorial cartoon as visual rhetoric: Rethinking Boss Tweed.Journal of Visual/Verbal Languaging, 2(2), 43–52.Google Scholar
  43. Dick, W. (1992). Constructivism and instructional design. In T.M. Duffy & J.H. Jonassen (Eds.),Constructivism and the technology of instruction: A conversation (pp. 91–98). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  44. Eastman, M. (1936).Enjoyment of laughter. New York: Crowell.Google Scholar
  45. Erickson, S.C. (1987, Spring). Giving a “good” lecture.Update on Teaching, 5(2).Google Scholar
  46. Ferguson, W., Bareiss, R., Birnbaum, L., & Osgood, R. (April, 1992) Asks systems: An approach to the realization of story-based teachers. Technical Report, The Institute for the Learning Sciences, Northwestern University: Evanston, Il.Google Scholar
  47. Fiderio, S. (1986, May). Humor, interactivity enhance CBT training.Computerworld, 60–61.Google Scholar
  48. Freud, S. (1960).Jokes and their relation to the unconscious. New York: Norton. (Original work published 1905.)Google Scholar
  49. Gagné, R.M. (1985).The conditions of learning (4th ed.) New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.Google Scholar
  50. Gagné, R.M., & Briggs, L.J. (1979).Principles of instructional design. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
  51. Gagné, R.M., & Driscoll, M.P. (1988).Essentials of learning for instruction. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  52. Goldstein, J.H., & McGhee, P.E. (1972). Foreword. In J.H. Goldstein & P.E. McGhee (Eds.),The psychology of humor (pp. xiii-xvii). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  53. Goor, M. (1989). Humor in the classroom: Options for enhancing learning. ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 332 090Google Scholar
  54. Gorham, J., & Christophel, D.M. (1990). The relationship of teachers' use of humor in the classroom to immediacy and student learning.Communication Education, 39(1), 46–62.Google Scholar
  55. Grace, A. (1991).Comedians. Charlottesville, VA: Thomasson-Grant.Google Scholar
  56. Gruner, C.R. (1967). Effects of humor on speaker ethos and audience information gain.Journal of Communication, 17, 228–233.Google Scholar
  57. Gruner, C.R. (1976). Wit and humor in mass communication. In A.J. Chapman & H.C. Foot (Eds.),Humour and laughter: Theory, research and applications (pp. 287–312). London: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
  58. Gruner, C.R. (1978).Understanding laughter: The workings of wit & humor. Chicago: Nelson-Hall.Google Scholar
  59. Guegan-Fisher, C. (1975).Culture through humor in the classroom. ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 138 071Google Scholar
  60. Hannafin, M.J., & Hooper, S.R. (1993). Learning principles. In M. Fleming & W. Levie (Eds.),Instructional message design: Principles from the behavioral and cognitive sciences (pp. 191–231). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.Google Scholar
  61. Hauck, W.E., & Thomas, J.W. (1972). The relationship of humor to intelligence, creativity, and intentional and incidental learning.Journal of Experimental Education, 40(4), 52–55.Google Scholar
  62. Hebb, D.O. (1972).A textbook of psychology (3rd ed.). Philadelphia: Saunders.Google Scholar
  63. Heitzmann, W.R. (1979). The political cartoon as a teaching device.Teaching Political Science, 6(2), 166–184.Google Scholar
  64. Hicken, S., Sullivan, H., & Klein, J. (1992). Learner control modes and incentive variations in computer-delivered instruction.Educational Technology Research and Development, 40(4), 15–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Hill, D.J. (1988).Humor in the classroom: A handbook for teachers (and other entertainers). Springfield, IL: Charles Thomas Publisher.Google Scholar
  66. Horn, G. (1972, December). Laughter … A saving grace.Today's Education, 37–38.Google Scholar
  67. Howe, F.C. (1993). Developmental trends.Child Study Journal, 23(4), 327–346.Google Scholar
  68. Igbalajobi, M. (1986). The effects of ridicule on the academic performance of secondary school students.Negro Educational Review, 37(1), 39–45.Google Scholar
  69. Jensen, E. (1988).Superteaching: Master strategies for building student success. Del Mar, CA: Turning Point.Google Scholar
  70. Jih, H.J., & Reeves, T.C. (1992). Mental models: A research focus for interactive learning systems.Educational Technology Research and Development, 40(3), 39–53.Google Scholar
  71. Jonassen, D.H. (1982). Advance organizers in text. In D.H. Jonassen (Ed.),The technology of text: Principles for structuring, designing, and displaying text (Vol I, pp. 253–275). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.Google Scholar
  72. Jonassen, D.H. (1988). Integrating learning strategies into a course to facilitate deeper processing. In D.H. Jonassen (Ed.),Instructional designs for microcomputer courseware (pp. 151–181). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  73. Jonassen, D.H., Grabinger, R.S., & Harris, N.D.C. (1991). Analyzing and selecting instructional strategies and tactics.Performance Improvement Quarterly, 4(2), 77–97.Google Scholar
  74. Kaplan, R.K., & Pascoe, G.C. (1977). Humorous lectures and humorous examples: Some effects upon comprehension and retention.Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 61–65.Google Scholar
  75. Keller, J.M. (1979). Motivation and instructional design.Journal of Instructional Development, 2, 26–34.Google Scholar
  76. Keller, J.M. (1983). Motivational design of instruction. In C.M. Reigeluth (Ed.),Instructional-design theories and models: An overview of their current status (pp. 383–434). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  77. Kennedy, A.J. (1972).An experimental study of the effects of humorous message content upon ethos and persuasiveness. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
  78. Koestler, A. (1964).The act of creation. London: Macmillan & Company.Google Scholar
  79. Kozma, R.B. (1991). Learning with media.Review of Educational Research, 61(2), 179–212.Google Scholar
  80. Kozma, R.B. (1992, April).Visualization, sonification, and virtual reality: Mapping external representations onto external meaning. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco.Google Scholar
  81. Kozma, R.B. (1994a). Will media influence learning? Reframing the debate.Educational Technology Research & Development, 42(2), 7–19.Google Scholar
  82. Kozma, R.B. (1994b). A reply: Media and method.Educational Technology Research & Development, 42(3), 11–13.Google Scholar
  83. LaFave, L., Haddad, J., & Maesen, W.A. (1976). Superiority, enhanced self-esteem, and perceived incongruity humour theory. In A.J. Chapman & H.C. Foot (Eds.),Humour and laughter: Theory, research and applications (pp. 63–91). London: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
  84. Larson, G. (1982). Humorous teaching makes serious learning.Teaching English in the Two-Year College, 8(3), 197–199.Google Scholar
  85. Laurel, B. (Ed.). (1990).The art of human-computer interface design. Reading MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  86. Laurel, B. (1991).Computers as theater. Reading MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  87. Lebow, D. (1993). Constructivist values for instructional systems design: Five principles toward a new mindset.Educational Technology Research & Development, 41(3), 4–16.Google Scholar
  88. Lepper, M.R., & Greene, D. (1978). Over justification research and beyond: Toward a means-ends analysis of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation. In M.R. Lepper & D. Greene (Eds.),The hidden costs of reward: New perspectives on the psychology of human motivation (pp. 109–148). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  89. Lodish, R. (1993). A world of difference.Principal, 73(1), 41–42.Google Scholar
  90. MacHovec, F.J. (1988).Humor: Theory, history, applications. Springfield, IL.: Charles C. Thomas Publisher.Google Scholar
  91. Markiewicz, D. (1974). The effects of humor on persuasion.Sociometry, 37, 407–422.Google Scholar
  92. Martin, B.L., & Briggs, L.J. (1986).The affective and cognitive domains: Integration for instruction and research. Englewood, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.Google Scholar
  93. Mayer, R.E. (1980). Elaboration techniques that increase the meaningfulness of technical text: An experimental test of the learning strategy hypothesis.Journal of Educational Psychology, 72, 770–784.Google Scholar
  94. McGhee, P.E. (1974). Development of children's ability to create the joking relationship.Child Development, 45(2), 552–556.Google Scholar
  95. McGhee, P.E. (1980). Toward the integration of entertainment and educational functions of television. In P.H. Tannenbaum (Ed.),The entertainment functions of television (pp. 183–208). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  96. McGhee, P.E. (1983). Humor development: Toward a life span approach. In P.E. McGhee & J.H. Goldstein (Eds.),Handbook of humor research (Vol. I, pp. 109–134). New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
  97. McGhee, P.E., & Goldstein, J.H. (1983). Preface. In P.E. McGhee & J.H. Goldstein (Eds.),Handbook of humor research (Vol. II, p. vi). New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
  98. McKeachie, W.J. (1990). Research on college teaching.Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 189–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Mechanic, D. (1962).Students under stress: A study of the social psychology of adaptation. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  100. Merrill, M.D. (1980). Learner control in computer-based learning.Computers & Education, 4, 77–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Minsky, M. (1984). Jokes and the logic of the cognitive unconscious. In L. Vaina & J. Hintikka (Eds.),Cognitive constraints on communication (pp. 175–200). Dordrecht, Holland: D. Reidel Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  102. Monson, D. (1968). Children's test responses to seven humorous stories.Elementary School Journal, 58, 334–339.Google Scholar
  103. Monson, J.A. (1994, September/October). Getting serious about humor.Gifted Child Today, 14–40.Google Scholar
  104. Morreall, J. (1983).Taking laughter seriously. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  105. Morrison, G.R., Ross, S.M., Gopalakrishnan, M., & Casey, J. (1995). The effects of feedback and incentives on achievement in computer-based instruction.Contemporary Educational Psychology, 20, 32–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. Morrison, G.R., Ross, S.M., & Johnsey, A. (1994, February).The use of generative learning strategies in computer-based instruction. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the Association for Educational Communications and Technology, Nashville, TN.Google Scholar
  107. Muir, F. (1990).The oxford book of humorous prose. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  108. Nerhardt, G. (1976). Incongruity and funniness: Towards a new descriptive model. In A.J. Chapman & H.C. Foot (Eds.),Humour and laughter: Theory, research and applications (pp. 55–62). London: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
  109. Neuliep, J.W. (1991). An examination of the content of high school teachers' humor in the classroom and the development of an inductively derived taxonomy of classroom humor.Communication Education, 40(4), 343–355.Google Scholar
  110. Padus, E. (1992).The complete guide to your emotions and your health. Emmaus, PA: Rodale Press.Google Scholar
  111. Parsons, J.B. (1977). Competency-based teacher education module (No. 2499) on classroom humor.Contemporary Education, 48(2), 110–111.Google Scholar
  112. Paulos, J.A. (1980).Mathematics and humor. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  113. Paulos, J.A. (1985).I think, therefore I laugh: An alternative approach to philosophy. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  114. Pintrich, P.R., & Garcia, T. (1994). Self-regulated learning in college students: Knowledge, strategies, and motivation. In P.R. Pintrich, D.R. Brown, & C.E. Weinstein (Eds.),Student motivation, cognition, and learning (pp. 113–133). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  115. Powell, J.P., & Anderson, L.W. (1985). Humour and teaching in higher education.Studies in Higher Education, 10(1), 79–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  116. Rareshide, S.W. (1993).Implications for teachers' use of humor in the classroom. ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 359 165Google Scholar
  117. Reigeluth, C.M. (Ed.). (1987).Instructional theories in action: Lessons illustrating selected theories and models. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  118. Reigeluth, C.M. (1989). Educational technology at the crossroads: New mindsets and new directions.Educational Technology Research & Development, 37(1), 1042–1629.Google Scholar
  119. Robinson, V.M. (1983). Humor and health. In P.E. McGhee & J.H. Goldstein (Eds.),Handbook of humor research (Vol. II, pp. 109–128). New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
  120. Roman, D. (1985). Laughter leavens learning.Computer Decisions, 70, 72.Google Scholar
  121. Rothbart, M.K. (1976). Incongruity, problem-solving and laughter. In A.J. Chapman & H.C. Foot (Eds.),Humour and laughter: Theory, research and applications (pp. 37–54). London: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
  122. Salomon, G. (1974). What is learned and how it is taught.: The interaction between media, message, task, and learner. In D.R. Olsen (Ed.),Media and symbols: The forms of expression, communication, and education. NSSE Yearbook (383–406). Chicago: National Society for the Study of Education.Google Scholar
  123. Schank, R.C. (1990).Tell me a story. New York: Charles Schribner's Sons.Google Scholar
  124. Schank, R.C., & Jona, M.Y. (1991). Empowering the student: New perspectives on the design of teaching systems.Journal of the Learning Sciences, 1(1), 7–35.Google Scholar
  125. Sewell, E.H., Jr. (1979, March).Effect of cartoon illustrations on the comprehension and evaluation of information presented in the print and audio mode. Paper presented at the annual convention of the Association of Educational Communications and Technology, New Orleans, LA.Google Scholar
  126. Sewell, E.H., Jr. (1980). Cartoon embellishments in information presentations.Educational Communications and Technology: A Journal of Theory, Research, and Development, 28(1), 39–46.Google Scholar
  127. Short, E.J., Basili, L.A., & Schatschneider, C.H. (1993). Analysis of humor skills among elementary school students: Comparisons of children with and without intellectual handicaps.American Journal on Mental Retardation, 98(1), 63–73.Google Scholar
  128. Shultz, T.R. (1974). Order of cognitive processing in humour appreciation.Canadian Journal of Psychology, 28, 409–420.Google Scholar
  129. Shultz, T.R. (1976). A cognitive-developmental analysis of humour. In A.J. Chapman & H.C. Foot (Eds.),Humour and laughter: Theory, research and applications (pp. 11–36). London: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
  130. Shultz, T., & Scott, M. (1974). The creation of verbal humor.Canadian Journal of Psychology, 28, 421–425.Google Scholar
  131. Singer, J.L., & Singer, D.G. (1979). Come back, Mr. Rogers, come back.Psychology Today, 56, 59–60.Google Scholar
  132. Snetsinger, W.R., & Grabowski, B.L. (1993, October).The use of humorous visuals to enhance computer-based instruction. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the International Visual Literacy Association, Rochester, NY.Google Scholar
  133. Snetsinger, W.R., & Grabowski, B.L. (1994, February).The use of humor in a CBI science lesson to enhance retention. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the Association for Educational Communications and Technology, Nashville, TN.Google Scholar
  134. Soukhanov, A.H. (Ed.). (1992).The American heritage dictionary of the English language, (3rd ed.). Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
  135. Stein, B.S., & Bransford, J.D. (1979). Constraints on effective elaboration: Effects of precision and subject generation.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 18, 769–777.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  136. Stopsky, F. (1992).Humor in the classroom: A new approach to critical thinking. Lowell, MA: Discovery Enterprises.Google Scholar
  137. Sullivan, H.J., Shultz, R.E., & Baker, R.L. (1971). Effects of systematic variations in reinforcement contingencies on learner performance.American Educational Research Journal, 8(1), 135–142.Google Scholar
  138. Suls, J.M. (1972). A two-stage model for the appreciation of jokes and cartoons: An information-processing analysis. In J.H. Goldstein & P.E. McGhee (Eds.),The psychology of humor: Theoretical perspectives and empirical issues (pp. 81–100). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  139. Suls, J.M. (1983). Cognitive processes in humor appreciation. In P.E. McGhee & J.H. Goldstein (Eds.),Handbook of humor research (Vol. I, (pp. 38–57). New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
  140. Surlin, S.H. (1978).Humor in television entertainment programming: Implications for social relations and social learning. ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 162 374Google Scholar
  141. Taylor, P.M. (1964). The effectiveness of humor in informative speeches.Central States Speech Journal, 5, 295–296.Google Scholar
  142. Tennyson, R.D., & Buttrey, T. (1980). Advisement and management strategies as design variables in computer-assisted instruction.Educational Communications and Technology Journal, 28, 169–176.Google Scholar
  143. Tessmer, M. (1993).Planning and conducting formative evaluations. London: Kogan Page.Google Scholar
  144. Thompson, A.D., Simonson, M.R., & Hargrave, C.P. (1993).Educational technology: A review of the research (Rev. ed.). Washington, DC: Association for Educational Communications and Technology.Google Scholar
  145. Torrance, E.P. (1974).The Torrance test of creative thinking. Lexington, MA: Ginn.Google Scholar
  146. Turkel, S. (1984).Second self. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
  147. Vance, C.M. (1987). A comparative study on the use of humor in the design of instruction.Instructional Science, 16, 79–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  148. Wakshlag, J.J., Day, K.D., & Zillmann, D. (1981). Selective exposure to educational television programs as a function of differently paced humorous inserts.Journal of Educational Psychology, 73, 27–32.Google Scholar
  149. Warnock, P. (1989). Humor as a didactic tool in adult education.Lifelong Learning: An Omnibus of Practice and Research, 12(8), 22–24.Google Scholar
  150. Weaver, J., Zillmann, D., & Bryant, J. (1988). Effects of humorous distortions on children's learning from television: Further evidence.Communication Education, 37, 181–187.Google Scholar
  151. Weinberg, M.D. (1973).The interactional effect of humor and anxiety on academic performance. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Yeshiva University, New York.Google Scholar
  152. Weiner, B. (1980).Human motivation. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.Google Scholar
  153. Wetzel, C.D., Radtke, P.H., & Stern, H.W. (1994).Instructional effectiveness of video media. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  154. Wittrock, M.C. (1989). Generative processes of comprehension.Educational Psychologist, 24, 345–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  155. Yerkes, R.M., & Dodson, J.D. (1908). The relation of strength of stimulus to rapidity of habit-formation.Journal of Comparative Neurological Psychology, 18, 459–482.Google Scholar
  156. Youngman, R.C. (1966).An experimental investigation of the effect of germane humor versus nongermane humor in an informative communication. Unpublished master's thesis, Ohio University, Athens.Google Scholar
  157. Zillmann, D. (1977). Humour and communication: Introduction. In A.J. Chapman & H.C. Foot (Eds.),It's a funny thing, humour (pp. 291–302). Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
  158. Zillmann, D. (1983). Disparagement humor. In P.E. McGhee & J.H. Goldstein (Eds.),Handbook of humor research (Vol. I, pp. 85–108). New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
  159. Zillmann, D., & Bryant, J. (1983). Uses and effects of humor in educational ventures. In P.E. McGhee & J.H. Goldstein (Eds.),Handbook of humor research (Vol. II, (pp. 173–193). New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
  160. Zillmann, D., & Bryant, J. (1988). Guidelines for the effective use of humor in children's educational television programs.Journal of Children in Contemporary Society, 20, 201–221.Google Scholar
  161. Zillmann, D., Masland, J., Weaver, J., Lacey, L., Jacobs, N., Dow, J., Klein, C., & Baker, S. (1984). Effects of humorous distortions on children's learning from educational television.Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 802–812.Google Scholar
  162. Zillmann, D., Williams, B.R., Bryant, J., Boynton, K.R., & Wolf, M.A. (1980). Acquisition of information from educational television programs as a function of differently paced humor inserts.Journal of Educational Psychology, 72, 170–180.Google Scholar
  163. Ziv, A. (1976). Facilitating effects of humor on creativity.Journal of Educational Psychology, 68, 318–322.Google Scholar
  164. Ziv, A. (1981).The psychology of humor. Tel Aviv: Yahdav.Google Scholar
  165. Ziv, A. (1983). The influence of humorous atmosphere on divergent thinking.Contemporary Educational Psychology, 8(1), 68–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  166. Ziv, A. (1984).Personality and sense-of-humor. New York: Springer Publishing.Google Scholar
  167. Ziv, A. (1988a). Teaching and learning with humor: Experiment and replication.Journal of Experimental Education, 57(1), 5–15.Google Scholar
  168. Ziv, A. (1988b).National styles of humor. New York: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© the Association for Educational Communications and Technology 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • James L. Teslow
    • 1
  1. 1.the University of Colorado at DenverUSA

Personalised recommendations