Advertisement

Atlantic Economic Journal

, Volume 27, Issue 2, pp 179–192 | Cite as

Structural characteristics of firms and industries and black and white wage inequality in the U.S. economy: 1988

  • Aparna Mitra
Articles

Abstract

The effects of firm and job characteristics on the wages of blacks and whites are analyzed using data from the 1988 National Longitudinal Survey of Youth [Bureau of Labor Statistics, 1997]. This study focuses on 2,370 full-time private sector employees. The results show that, first, blacks are disproportionately employed in large establishments despite their lower cognitive achievements. Second, blacks do not enjoy significant wage premiums associated with supervisory positions. Third, although the wage gap between blacks and whites is reduced considerably, controlling for education and cognitive skills, the gap increases significantly when structural attributes are included in the wage regressions despite the large wage premiums associated with employment in large establishments.

Keywords

Private Sector International Economic Public Finance Cognitive Skill Longitudinal Survey 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Baron, James N.; Bielby, William T. “Bringing the Firm Back In: Stratification, Segmentation and the Organization of Work,”American Sociological Review, 45, October 1980, pp. 737–65.Google Scholar
  2. Brown, C.; Hamilton, J.; Medoff, J.Employers Large and Small, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1990.Google Scholar
  3. Bureau of Labor Statistics.National Labor Survey Handbook, Columbus, OH: Ohio State University, 1997.Google Scholar
  4. Dickens, William T.; Katz, Lawrence. “Interindustry Wage Differences and Industry Characteristics,” in Kevin Lang; Jonathan S. Leonard, eds.,Unemployment and the Structure of Labor Markets, New York, NY: Basil Blackwell, 1987, pp. 48–89.Google Scholar
  5. Evans, David; Leighton, Linda S. “Why Do Smaller Firms Pay Less?,”Journal of Human Resources, 24, 2, October 1988, pp. 299–318.Google Scholar
  6. Freeman, Richard B.; Medoff James L.What Do Unions Do?, New York, NY: Basic Books, 1984.Google Scholar
  7. Granovetter, Mark. “Small is Bountiful: Labor Markets and Establishment Size,”American Sociological Review, 49, 1984, pp. 323–34.Google Scholar
  8. Hodson, Randy. “Companies, Industries and the Measurement of Economic Segmentation,”American Sociological Review, 49, 1984, pp. 335–48.Google Scholar
  9. Foulkes, Fred K.Personnel Policies in Large Nonunion Companies, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1980.Google Scholar
  10. Kluegel, James R. “The Causes and Costs of Racial Exclusion from Job Authority,”American Sociological Review, 43, June 1978, pp. 285–301.Google Scholar
  11. Krueger, Alan B.; Summers, Lawrence H. “Efficiency Wages and the Inter-Industry Wage Structure,”Econometrica, 56, 1988, pp. 259–93.Google Scholar
  12. Kwoka, John E. “Monopoly, Plant, and Union Effects on Worker Wages,”Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 36, 1983, pp. 251–7.Google Scholar
  13. Lester, Richard. “Pay Differentials by Size of Establishment,”Industrial Relations, 7, 1967, pp. 57–67.Google Scholar
  14. Long, J. E.; Link, A. N. “The Impact of Market Structure on Wages, Fringe Benefits and Turnover,”Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 36, 1983, pp. 239–50.Google Scholar
  15. Marshall, Ray. “The Economics of Racial Discrimination: A Survey,”Journal of Economic Literature, 12, 1974, pp. 849–971.Google Scholar
  16. Masters, Stanley. “An Interindustry Analysis of Wages and Plant Size,”Review of Economics and Statistics, 51, August 1969, pp. 34–45.Google Scholar
  17. Mellow, Wesley. “Employer Size and Wages,”Review of Economics and Statistics, 64, 3, 1982, pp. 495–501.Google Scholar
  18. Neal, Derek; Johnson, William. “The Role of Premarket Factors in Black-White Wage Differences,”Journal of Political Economy, 104, 5, 1996, pp. 869–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Oi, Walter. “Heterogeneous Firms and the Organization of Production,”Economic Inquiry, 21, 1983, pp. 147–71.Google Scholar
  20. O'Neill, June. “The Role of Human Capital in Earnings Differences Between Black and White Men,”Journal of Economic Perspectives, 4, 1990, pp. 25–45.Google Scholar
  21. Smith, James P.; Welch, Finis. “Black Economic Progress After Myrdal,”Journal of Economic Literature, 27, June 1989, pp. 519–64.Google Scholar
  22. Stolzenberg, Ross M. “Bringing the Boss Back in: Employer Size, Employee Schooling and Socioeconomic Achievement,”American Sociological Review, 43, December 1978, pp. 813–28.Google Scholar
  23. Villemez, Wayne J.; Bridges, William P. “When Bigger is Better: Differences in the Individual Level Effect of Firm and Establishment Size,”American Sociological Review, 53, April 1988, pp. 237–55.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© International Atlantic Economic Society 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • Aparna Mitra
    • 1
  1. 1.University of Texas at ArlingtonU.S.A.

Personalised recommendations