Advertisement

An analysis of conference interactions onTeleNex—A computer network for ESL teachers

  • Amy TsuiEmail author
  • Wing Wah Ki
Research

Abstract

“TeleNex” is a computer network set up to enhance the professional development of inservice English teachers in Hong Kong by allowing them to access and share curriculum materials and to communicate with teacher educators at The University of Hong Kong and fellow teachers in other schools. This paper reports a study on the characteristics of the interactions in the public conferences on “TeleNex” during its first 16 months of full operation and the possible factors contributing to these characteristics. In order to analyze the various aspects of conference interactions, including teacher participation, initiation and response, response patterns and message types, a framework of message analysis was developed, drawing on concepts in conversational and discourse analysis. To investigate the possible contributing factors, a questionnaire was designed and administered to all users at the end of the 16-month period. The interaction analysis results and the questionnaire results confirmed the findings in previous studies carried out by the authors that social and psychological factors were very important in shaping the network interactions.

Keywords

Professional Development Teacher Educator Educational Technology Response Pattern Network Interaction 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Austin, J.L. (1961).How to do things with words. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Black, S., Levin, J., Mehan, H., & Quinn, C. (1983). Real and non-real time interaction: Unravelling multiple threads of discourse.Discourse Processes, 6(1), 59–75.Google Scholar
  3. Blalock, H. (1979).Social Statistics. Singapore: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  4. Bull, G., Harris, J., Lloyd, J., & Short, J. (1989) The electronic academical village.Journal of Teacher Education, 40(4), 27–31.Google Scholar
  5. Coulthard, M., & Montgomery, M. (1981). Developing a description of spoken discourse. In Coulthard, M., & Montgomery, M. (Eds.),Studies in discourse Analysis. (pp. 1–50). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  6. Feenberg, A., & Bellman, B. (1990). Social factor research in computer-mediated communications. In L. Harasim, (Ed.),On-line education (pp. 67–98). New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
  7. Goffman, E. (1971).Relations in public. London: Allan Lane.Google Scholar
  8. Henri, F. (1992). Computer conferencing and content analysis. In A. Kaye. (Ed.),Collaborative learning through computer conferencing (pp. 117–136). Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
  9. Kamper, R. J. (1991, November). Computer-mediated communication: Conquest of time and space or just another technological seduction?Educational Technology, 31(11), 20–25.Google Scholar
  10. Levin, J., Kim, H., & Riel, M. (1990). Analyzing instructional interactions on electronic message networks. In L. Harasim (Ed.),On-line education: Perspectives on a new environment (pp. 185–213). New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
  11. Levin, S. (1995). Teachers using technology: Barriers and breakthroughs.International Journal of Educational Telecommunications, 1(1), 53–70.Google Scholar
  12. Quinn, C., Mehan, H., Levin, J., & Black, S. (1983). Real education in non-real time: The use of electronic message systems for instruction.Instructional Science, 11(4), 313–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Rice, R.E. (1987). Computer-mediated communication and organizational innovation.Journal of Communication, 37(4), 65–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Riel, M. (1989). Four models of educational telecommunications: Connections to the future.Education and Computing, 5, 261–274.Google Scholar
  15. Riel, M., & Levin, J. (1990) Building electronic communities: Success and failure in computer networking.Instructional Science, 19(2), 145–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Sacks, H., Schegloff, E., & Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking in conversation.Language, 50(4), 596–735.Google Scholar
  17. Searle, J.R. (1969).Speech Acts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Simon, C. (1992). Telematic support for in-service teacher training. In A. Kaye (Ed.),Collaborative learning through computer conferencing (pp. 29–38). Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
  19. Sinclair, J., & M. Coulthard (1975).Towards an analysis of spoken discourse. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Sunal, D. W., & Sunal, C. S. (1992). The impact of network communication technology on science teacher education.Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 11(2), 143–153.Google Scholar
  21. Tsui, A.B.M. (1993). The interpretation of multi-act moves in spoken discourse. In M. Baker, G. Francis, & T. Elena (Eds.),Text and Technology (pp. 75–94). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
  22. Tsui, A.B.M. (1995). Social factors in the implementation of a computer network for English language teachers.Journal of Information Technology for Teacher Education, 4(2), 149–164.Google Scholar
  23. Tsui, A.B.M. (1996). The participant structures ofTeleNex—A computer network for teacher development.International Journal of Educational Telecommunications 2(2/3), 171–197.Google Scholar
  24. Tsui, A.B.M., Coniam, D., Sengupta, S., & Wu, K.Y. (1994). Computer-mediated communications and teacher education: The case ofTeleNex. InProceedings of International Language in Education Conference '94 (pp.352–369). Hong Kong: Hong Kong Government Printers.Google Scholar
  25. Tsui, A.B.M., & Ki, W.W. (1994). Whence and whitherTeleNex: A computer network for English language teachers in Hong Kong.Curriculum Forum, 4(1), 1–12.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Association for Educational Communications and Technology 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Curriculum StudiesUniversity of Hong KongHong Kong

Personalised recommendations