User-centered design and usability testing of a web site: An illustrative case study

  • Michael D. Corry
  • Theodore W. Frick
  • Lisa Hansen
Development

Abstract

Administrators at a large midwestern university recognized that their World Wide Web site was rapidly becoming an important factor in recruiting new students. They also expected this Web site to serve many different types of information needs for existing students, faculty, staff, and alumni. an interdisciplinary team of faculty, graduate students, and staff was formed to evaluate the existing Web site. A group from this team first conducted a needs analysis to determine the kinds of information the target population was seeking. This analysis led to the creation of a new information structure for the Web site. Usability tests of the both the new and old designs were conducted on paper. Users were able to find answers to frequently asked questions much more rapidly and successfully with the new information structure. This structure was further refined through additional usability tests conducted on the Web itself. This descriptive case study illustrates the value of user-centered design and usability testing of World Wide Web sites.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Booth, P.A. (1989). Usability in human-computer interaction. InAn introduction to human-computer interaction, (p. 103–136). East Sussex, UK: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Ltd.Google Scholar
  2. Dick, W. & Carey, L. (1990).The systematic design of instruction. (3rd ed.) New York, NY: Harper-Collins.Google Scholar
  3. Dumas, J.S. & Redish, J.C. (1993).A practical guide to usability testing. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corporation.Google Scholar
  4. Eason, K. (1988).Information technology and organisational change. London: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
  5. Frick, T.W., Corry, M.D., Hansen, L. & Maynes, B. (1995).Design-research for the Indiana University Bloomington world wide web: The “limestone pages.” URL Address: http://education.indiana.edu/ist/faculty/iuwebrep.html.Google Scholar
  6. Gould, J.D. (1988). How to design usable systems (excerpt). In R. Baecker & W. Buxton (Eds.),Readings in human-computer interaction: A multidisciplinary approach, (pp. 93–115). New York, NY: Morgan-Kaufman.Google Scholar
  7. Gould, J.D. & Lewis, C. (1985). Designing for usability: Key principles and what designers think. In R. Baecker, J. Grudin, W. Buxton, & S. Greenberg (Eds.),Readings in human-computer interaction, toward the year 2000, (pp. 528–547). New York, NY: Morgan-Kaufman.Google Scholar
  8. Hix, D. & Hartson, H.R. (1994).Developing user interfaces: Ensuring usability through product and process. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.Google Scholar
  9. Nielsen, J. (1994).Usability engineering. Boston, MA: AP Professional.Google Scholar
  10. Norman, D.A. (1988).Design of everyday things. New York, NY: Currency Doubleday.Google Scholar
  11. Preece, J., Rogers, Y., Sharp, H., Benyon, D., Holland, S., & Carey, T. (1994).Human-computer interaction. Wokingham, England: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  12. Rubin, J. (1994).Handbook of usability testing: How to plan, design, and conduct effective tests. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.Google Scholar
  13. Shackel, B. (1991). Usability—context, framework, definition, design and evaluation. In B. Shackel & S. Richardson (Eds.),Human factors for informatics usability, (pp. 21–37). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Sugar, W.A. & Boling, E. (1995). User-centered innovation: A model for early usability testing.Proceedings of the 1995 Annual National Convention of the Association for Educational Communications and Technology (AECT), Anaheim, CA.Google Scholar
  15. Worthen, B.R. & Sanders, J.R. (1987).Educational evaluation: Alternative approaches and practical guidelines. New York, NY: Longman.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Association for Educational Communications and Technology 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michael D. Corry
    • 1
  • Theodore W. Frick
    • 2
  • Lisa Hansen
    • 2
  1. 1.the Educational Technology Leadership programGeorge Washington UniversityUSA
  2. 2.the Instructional Systems Technology departmentIndiana University BloomingtonUSA

Personalised recommendations