Advertisement

Knowledge constructing through hypermedia authoring

  • Molly Nicaise
  • Michael Crane
Research

Abstract

According to prominent learning theorists, learning is much more than gathering information in a well-designed, teacher-centered environment; learning is promoted when students pursue individual interests, when they build on prior knowledge, and when they engage in hands-on and authentic activity. Although a great deal of literature exists describing ideals such as these, research examining the implementation of these ideals in classrooms is scarce, and using technology for more than information giving is even scarcer. The purpose of this study was to examine a graduate course at a large, Midwestern university to discern how educational theory translates into classroom practice. In the course, students learned about educational theory by designing and creating a hypermedia chapter for a World Wide Web-based book. Qualitative data were collected across a 16-week semester and revealed both student and teacher perspectives regarding the course, including the strengths and limitations of a student-as-multimedia-author approach. The findings indicated that most all students were highly satisfied with the course, that some transferred learning, and that students developed skills and knowledge with instructional design, educational theory, and technology.

Keywords

Prior Knowledge Qualitative Data World Wide Educational Technology Learning Theorist 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Anglin, G. (Ed.) (1991).Instructional technology: Past, present, and future. Denver, CO: Libraries Unlimited.Google Scholar
  2. Becker, H.J. (1991). When powerful tools meet conventional beliefs and institutional constraints.Computing Techer, 6–9.Google Scholar
  3. Bednar, A.K., Cunningham, D., Duffy, T.M., & Perry, J.D. (1992). Theory into practice: How do we Link? In T.M. Duffy, & D.H. Jonassen (Eds.),Constructivism and the technology of instruction (pp. 17–34). Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  4. Chi, M.T., Feltovich, P.J., & Glaser, R. (1981). Categorization and representation of physics problems by experts and novices.Cognitive Science, 5, 121–152.Google Scholar
  5. Chou, L. & Moretti, F., (1992). Teaching history in the context of hypermedia design (Tech. Report). New York: The New Laboratory for Teaching and Learning.Google Scholar
  6. Cooper, P., & McIntyre, D. (1996). The importance of power-sharing in classroom learning. In M. Hughes (Ed.),Teaching and learning in changing times (pp. 88–107). Cambridge, MA: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar
  7. Cronin, J.F. (1993). Four misconceptions about authentic learning.Educational Leadership, 50(7), 78–80.Google Scholar
  8. Duffy, T.M., & Jonassen, D.H. (Eds.) (1992).Constructivism and the technology of instruction. Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  9. Fitzgerald, G. E., Hardin, L., & Hollingsead, C. (1997). Engaging preservice teachers in hypermedia authoring: Process and outcomes.Journal of Educational Computing Research, 16, 191–207.Google Scholar
  10. Fosnot, C.T. (1989).Inquiring teachers, inquiring learners: A constructivist approach for teaching. New York, N.Y.: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  11. Fraser, R. (1988). Theme group 2: Computers and the teaching of mathematics. In A. Hirst, & K. Hirst (Eds.),Proceedings of the Sixth International Congress on Mathematical Education, (pp. 215–216). Budapest: Malev.Google Scholar
  12. Gagné, R.M. (1985).The conditions of learning (4th ed.). New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
  13. Gardner, H. (1991).The unschooled mind: How children think and how schools should teach. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  14. Glasgow, N.A. (1997).New curriculum for new times: A guide to student-centered problem-based learning. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.Google Scholar
  15. Harel, I. (1990). Children as software designers: A constructionist approach for learning mathematics.The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 9(1), 3–93.Google Scholar
  16. Harel, I. & Papert, S. (1991).Constructionism. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  17. Hopkins, D. (1985).A teacher's guide to classroom research. Philadelphia, PA: Open University.Google Scholar
  18. Hsu, J.J., Chapelle, C.A., & Thompson, A.D. (1993). Exploratory learning environments: What are they and do students explore?Journal of Educational Computing Research, 9(1), 1–15.Google Scholar
  19. Jonassen, D. (1991). Evaluating constructivistic learning.Educational Technology, 31(9), 28–32.Google Scholar
  20. Kaput, J. (1992). Technology and mathematics education. In D. Grouws (Ed.),Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 515–556). New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  21. Kozma, R., Belzer, S., & Jaffe, J.M. (1993, April). BioMap: An interactive hypermedia environment to promote conceptual understanding in biology. Paper presented at American Educational Research Association, Atlanta, GA.Google Scholar
  22. Lajoie, S.P., & Derry, S.J. (1993).Computers as cognitive tools. Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  23. Lehrer, R. (1993) Authors of knowledge: Patterns of hypermedia design. In S.P. Lajoie & S.J. Derry (Eds.),Computers as cognitive tools, pp. 197–227. Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  24. Liu, M. & Rutledge, K. (1996). A study of high school students as multimedia designers. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New York.Google Scholar
  25. Merriam, S.B. (1988).Case study research in education: A qualitative approach. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  26. Miles, M.B., & Huberman, A.M. (1984). Drawing valid meaning from qualitative data: Toward a shared craft.Educational Researcher, 13(5), 20–30.Google Scholar
  27. Newmann, F. (1996).Authentic achievement: Restructuring schools for intellectual quality. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  28. Nicaise, M. (1996). Evaluating student learning with mock debates.Contemporary Education, 68(2), 131–136.Google Scholar
  29. Nicaise, M., & Barnes, D. (1996). The union of technology, constructivism, & teacher education.Journal of Teacher Education, 47(3), 203–210.Google Scholar
  30. Noblit, G.W., & Hare, R.D. (1988).Meta-ethnography: Synthesizing qualitative studies. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  31. Papert, S. (1980).Mindstorms. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  32. Perkins, D. (1986).Knowledge as design. Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  33. Perkins, D. (1992). What constructivism demands of the learner.Educational Technology, 31(9), 19–21.Google Scholar
  34. Piaget, J. (1970). Piaget's theory. In P.H. Mussen (Ed.),Carmichael's manual of child psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 703–732). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  35. Rossman, G.B. (1993).Building explanations across case studies: A framework for synthesis. Boulder, CO: Curriculum Reform Project, University of Colorado-Boulder. (ERIC document reproduction service No. ED373115).Google Scholar
  36. Schank, R. C., & Cleary, C. (1994).Engines for Education. Evanston, IL: The Institute for the Learning Sciences.Google Scholar
  37. Schmidt, H.G. (1993). Foundation of problem-based learning: Some explanatory notes.Medical Education, 27(5), 422–432.Google Scholar
  38. Slavin, R. (1994).Educational Psychology (4th edition). Needham Heights, MA: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
  39. Spoehr, K.T. (1993). Profiles of hypermedia authors: How students learn by doing. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Atlanta, GA.Google Scholar
  40. Wood, D., Bruner, J., & Ross, S. (1976). The role of tutoring in problem solving.British Journal of Psychology, 66, 181–191.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Association for Educational Communications and Technology 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • Molly Nicaise
    • 1
  • Michael Crane
    • 2
  1. 1.Multimedia Arts & Technologies DepartmentSanta Barbara City CollegeUSA
  2. 2.Fulton Middle School in Fulton

Personalised recommendations