Atlantic Economic Journal

, Volume 32, Issue 3, pp 175–190 | Cite as

Divorce and female labor force participation: Evidence from times-series data and cointegration

  • Dale Bremmer
  • Randy Kesselring

Abstract

The divorce rate in the United States has increased over the last 40 years. This increase was accompanied both by growing female labor force participation and rising female income. These changes were accompanied by a significant reduction in the birth rate for married women. This article uses time-series data and cointegration techniques to determine the direction of causality between these variables. Analysis of the impulse functions show that the divorce rate will increase if either female labor force participation or income increases. Positive innovations to the divorce rate increase the labor force participation rate of married women. Rising levels of income lead to greater female participation in the labor market.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Becker, G. S.; Landes, E. M.; Michael, R. T. “An Economic Analysis of Marital Instability,”Journal of Political Economy, 85, 6, December 1977, pp. 1141–87.Google Scholar
  2. Breusch, T. S. “Testing for Autocorrelation in Dynamic Linear Models,”Australian Economic Papers, 17, 31, December 1978, pp. 334–55.Google Scholar
  3. Bremmer, D.; Kesselring, R. “The Relationship Between Female Labor Force Participation and Divorce: A Test Using Aggregate Data,” Unpublished Mimeo, 1999.Google Scholar
  4. D'amico, R. “Status Maintenance or Status Competition? Wife's Relative Wages as a Determinant of Labor Supply and Martial Instability,”Social Forces, 61, 4, June 1983, pp. 1186–1205.Google Scholar
  5. Dickey, D. A.; Fuller, W. A. “Distribution of the Estimators for Autoregressive Time-Series With a Unit Root,”Journal of the American Statistical Association, 74, 366, June 1979, pp. 427–31.Google Scholar
  6. Godfrey, L. G. “Testing against General Autoregressive and Moving Average Error Models When the Regressors Include Lagged Dependent Variables,”Econometrica, 1978, 46, 6, November 1978, pp. 1293–1302.Google Scholar
  7. Greene, W. H.; Quester, A. Q. “Divorce Risk and Wives' Labor Supply Behavior,”Social Science Quarterly, 63, 1, March 1982, pp. 16–27.Google Scholar
  8. Greenstein, T. N. “Marital Disruption and the Employment of Married Women,”Journal of Marriage and the Family, 52, 3, August 1990, pp. 657–77.Google Scholar
  9. Hannan, M. T.; Tuma, N. B.; Groeneveld, L. P. “Income and Independence Effects on Marital Dissolution: Results From the Seattle and Denver Income-Maintenance Experiements,”American Journal of Sociology, 84, 3, November 1978, 611–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hoffman, S.; Duncan, G. “The Effect of Incomes, Wages, and AFDC Benefits on Martial Disruption,”The Journal of Human Resources, 30, 1, Winter 1995, pp. 19–41.Google Scholar
  11. Johansen, S.; Juselius, K. “Maximum Likelihood Estimation and Inferences on Cointegration-With Applications to the Demand for Money,”Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 52, 2, May 1990, pp. 169–210.Google Scholar
  12. Johansen, S. “Estimation and Hypothesis Testing of Cointegrated Vectors in Gaussian Vector Autoregressive Models,”Econometrica, 59, 6, November 1991, pp. 1551–80.Google Scholar
  13. Johnson, W. R.; Skinner, J. “Labor Supply and Martial Separation,”American Economic Review, 76, 1, June 1986, pp. 455–69.Google Scholar
  14. Lombardo, K. V. “Women's Rising Market Opportunities and Increased Labor Force Participation,”Economic Inquiry, 37, 2, April 1999, pp. 195–212.Google Scholar
  15. Mincer, J. “Intercountry Comparisons of Labor Force Trends and Related Developments: An Overview,”Journal of Labor Economics, 3, 1, pt. 2, January 1985, pp. S1–S32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Nelson, C. R.; Plosser, C. I. “Trends and Random Walks in Macroeconomic Time Series: Some Evidence and Implications,”Journal of Monetary Economics, 10, 2, September 1982, pp. 139–62.Google Scholar
  17. Phillips, P.C.B.; Perron, P. “Testing for a Unit Root in Time-Series Regression,”Biometrika, 75, 2, June 1988, pp. 334–46.Google Scholar
  18. Shapiro, D.; Shaw, L. “Growth in Supply Force Attachment of Married Women: Accounting for Changes in the 1970s,”Southern Economic Journal, 6, 3, September 1985, pp. 307–29.Google Scholar
  19. South, S. “Economic Conditions and the Divorce Rate: A Time-Series Analysis of Postwar United States,”Journal of Marriage and the Family, 47, 1, February 1985, pp. 31–41.Google Scholar
  20. South, S.; Spitze, G. “Determinants of Divorce over the Martial Life Course,”American Sociological Review, 51, 4, August 1986, pp. 583–90.Google Scholar
  21. Spitze, G.; South, S. “Women's Employment, Time Expenditure, and Divorce,”Journal of Family Issues, 6, 3, September 1985, pp. 307–29.Google Scholar
  22. Stock, J. H.; Watson, M. W. “Vector Autoregressions,”Journal of Economic Perspectives, 15, 4, Fall 2001, pp. 101–15.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© International Atlantic Economic Society 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dale Bremmer
    • 1
  • Randy Kesselring
    • 2
  1. 1.Rose-Hulman Institute of TechnologyU.S.A.
  2. 2.Arkansas State UniversityU.S.A.

Personalised recommendations