Atlantic Economic Journal

, Volume 27, Issue 1, pp 59–73 | Cite as

An analysis of PAC contributions and legislator quality

  • Robert E. Florence


This paper empirically examines the influence of three legislator attributes on political action committee campaign contributions. In particular, the study investigates the roles that committee assignment, committee leadership, and majority party membership play on campaign contributions from political action committee representing firms from the four well-defined industries of aerospace, airline, automobile, and oil. The empirical results indicate that committee leadership is a key variable that drives contributions. However, membership on a seemingly relevant committee does not appear to carry as much weight. Furthermore, majority party membership appears to have a significant influence over the level of contributions. These patterns appear to be consistent over the eight election cycles studied.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Bennett, Randall; Loucks, Christine. "Savings and Loan and Finance Industry PAC Contributions to Incumbent Members of the House Banking Committee,"Public Choice, 79, 1994, pp. 83–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Chappell, Henry W. "Campaign Contributions and Congressional Voting: A Simultaneous PROBIT-TOBIT Model,"Review of Economics and Statistics, 64, 1982, pp. 77–83.Google Scholar
  3. __. "Campaign Contributions and Voting on the Cargo Preference Bill,"Public Choice, 36, 1981, pp. 301–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Denzau, Arthur; Munger, Michael. "Legislators and Interest Groups: How Unorganized Interests Get Represented,"American Political Science Review, 1986, pp. 89–106.Google Scholar
  5. Endersby, James; Munger, Michael. "The Impact of Legislator Attributes on Union PAC Campaign Contributions,"Journal of Labor Research, XIII, 1992, pp. 79–97.Google Scholar
  6. Evans, Diana. "Oil PACs and Aggressive Contribution Strategies,"Journal of Politics, 50, 1988, pp. 1047–56.Google Scholar
  7. Federal Election Commission.Campaign Expenditures in the United States: 1979–1994, Washington, DC: Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research (ICPSR), various years.Google Scholar
  8. Godwin, R. Kenneth. "Investments in Rent-Seeking,"Public Choice, 64, 1990, pp. 291–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gopoian, J. David. "What Makes PACs Tick? An Analysis of the Allocation Patterns of Economics Interest Groups,"American Journal of Political Science, 28, 1984, pp. 259–81.Google Scholar
  10. Grenzke, Janet. "PACs and the Congressional Supermarket: The Currency Is Complex,"American Journal of Political Science, 33, 1989a, pp. 1–24.Google Scholar
  11. __. "Candidate Attributes and PAC Contributions,"Western Political Quarterly, 42, 1989b, pp. 245–64.Google Scholar
  12. Grier, Kevin; Munger, Michael. "Committee Assignments, Constituent Preferences, and Campaign Contributions,"Economic Inquiry, 29, 1991, pp. 24–43.Google Scholar
  13. __. "The Impact of Legislator Attributes on Interest Group Campaign Contributions,"Economic Inquiry, 29, 1986, pp. 24–43.Google Scholar
  14. Grier, Kevin; Munger, Michael; Torrent, Gary. "Allocation Patterns of PAC Monies: The U.S. Senate,"Public Choice, 67, 1990, pp. 111–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hall, R. L.; Wayman, F. W. "Buying Time: Moneyed Interests and the Mobilization of Bias in Congressional Committees,"American Political Science Review, 84, 1990, pp. 797–820.Google Scholar
  16. Keim, Gerald; Zardkoohi, Asghar. "Looking for Leverage in PAC Markets: Corporate and Labor Contributions Considered,"Public Choice, 58, 1988, pp. 21–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Langbein, Laura I. "PACs, Lobbies and Political Conflict: The Case of Gun Control,"Public Choice, 77, 1993, pp. 551–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Loucks, Christine. "Finance Industry PAC Contributions to U.S. Senators, 1983–88,"Public Choice, 89, 1996, pp. 219–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Mitchell, William; Munger, Michael. "Economic Models of Interest Groups: An Introductory Survey,"American Journal of Political Science, 35, 1991, pp. 512–46.Google Scholar
  20. Munger, Michael. "A Simple Test of the Thesis that Committee Jurisdictions Shape Corporate PAC Contributions,"Public Choice, 62, 1989, pp. 181–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Poole, Keith; Romer, Thomas. "Patterns of Political Action Committee Contributions to the 1980 Campaigns for the United States House of Representatives,"Public Choice, 47, 1985, pp. 63–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Regens, J. L.; Elliott, E.; Gaddie, R. K. "Regulatory Costs, Committee Jurisdictions, and Corporate PAC Contributions,"Social Science Quarterly, 72, 1991, pp. 751–60.Google Scholar
  23. Romer, Thomas; Snyder, James. "An Empirical Investigation of the Dynamics of PAC Contributions,"American Journal of Political Science, 38, 1994, pp. 745–69.Google Scholar
  24. Snyder, J. M. "Campaign Contributions as Investments: The U.S. House of Representatives,"Journal of Political Economy, 98, 1990, pp. 1195–228.Google Scholar
  25. Stratman, T. "What Do Campaign Contributions Buy: Deciphering Causal Effects of Money and Votes,"Southern Economic Journal, 57, 1991, pp. 606–20.Google Scholar
  26. Tobin, James. "Estimation of Relationships for Limited Dependent Variables,"Econometrica, 1958, pp. 24–36.Google Scholar
  27. U.S. Congress (Joint Committee on Printing).Congressional Directory, Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, various years.Google Scholar
  28. Wayman, Frank. "Arms Control and Strategic Arms Voting in the U.S. Senate: Patterns of Change,"Journal of Conflict Resolution, 29, 1985, pp. 225–51.Google Scholar
  29. Welch, William. "Campaign Contributions and Legislative Voting: Milk Money and Dairy Price Supports,"Western Political Quarterly, 35, 1982, pp. 478–95.Google Scholar
  30. Wright, John. "PACs, Contributions, and Roll Calls: An Organizational Perspective,"American Political Science Review, 79, 1985, pp. 400–14.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© International Atlantic Economic Society 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robert E. Florence
    • 1
  1. 1.University of Notre DameUSA

Personalised recommendations