Media will never influence learning

  • Richard E. Clark

Abstract

The purpose of this discussion is to explain and sharpen different points of view about the impact of media and attributes of media on learning, motivation and efficiency gains from instruction. This paper is an attempt to summarize my arguments about the research and theory in this area and to respond to Robert Kozma's criticism of my earlier discussion of these issues. I will first briefly summarize my arguments about media effects; next I will attempt to characterize the many reactions to the controversial claim that media do not influence learning or motivation. Finally, I will respond to the specific criticisms advanced by Robert Kozma this issue.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Clark, R. E. (1983). Reconsidering research on learning from media.Review of Educational Research, 53(4), 445–459.Google Scholar
  2. Clark, R. E. (1985a). Confounding in educational computing research.Journal of Educational Computing Research.1(2), 445–460.Google Scholar
  3. Clark, R. E. (1985b). The importance of treatment explication in computer-based instruction research.Journal of Educational Computing Research, 1(3), 389–394.Google Scholar
  4. Clark, R. E. (1985c). Evidence for confounding in computer-based instruction studies: Analyzing the meta analyses.Educational Communication and Technology Journal, 33(4).Google Scholar
  5. Clark, R. E. (1986). Absolutes and angst in educational technology research: A reply to Don Cunningham.Educational Communication and Technology Journal, 34(1), 8–10.Google Scholar
  6. Clark, R. E. (1987). Which technology for what purpose. Paper presented at an invited symposium for the annual meeting of the Association for Educational Communication and Technology, Atlanta, GA.Google Scholar
  7. Clark, R. E. & Salomon, G. (1986). Media in teaching. In M. Wittrock (Ed.),Handbook of Research on Teaching, Third Edition, New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  8. Clark, R. E. and Sugrue, B. M. (1988). Research on instructional media, 1978–1988. In D. Ely (Ed.),Educational Media Yearbook 1987–88. Littletown, CO: Libraries Unlimited.Google Scholar
  9. Cunningham, D. J. (1986). Good guys and bad guys.Educational Communication and Technology Journal, 34(1), 3–7.Google Scholar
  10. Gick, M. & Holyoak, K, (1987). Cognitive Basis of Knowledge Transfer, In S.M. Cormier and S. D. Hagman (Eds.),Transfer of Learning. NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  11. Kozma, R. B. (1991). Learning with media.Review of Educational Research, 61(2), 179–212.Google Scholar
  12. Kozma, R. B. (1993). Will media influence learning? Reframing the debate. Paper presented at the International Meeting of the EARLI, Aix en Provence, September 1993.Google Scholar
  13. Kozma, R. B. (1994). Will media influence learning? Reframing the debate.Educational Technology Research & Development, 42(2), 7–19.Google Scholar
  14. Kulik, J. A. (1985). The importance of outcome studies: A reply to Clark.Educational Communications and Technology Journal, 34(1), 381–386.Google Scholar
  15. Levie, W.H. & Dickie, K.E. (1973). The analysis and application of media. In Travers, R.M.W. (Ed.),Second Handbook of Research on Teaching, Chicago: Rand McNally.Google Scholar
  16. Lumsdaine, A. A. (1963). Instruments and Media of Instruction. In N. Gage (Ed.),Handbook of Research on Teaching, Chicago: Rand McNally.Google Scholar
  17. Mielke, K. W. (1968). Questioning the questions of ETV research.Educational Broadcasting Review, 2, 6–15.Google Scholar
  18. Petkovich, M. D. & Tennyson, R. (1984). Clark's “Learning from media”: A critique.Educational Communications and Technology Journal, 32(4), 233–241.Google Scholar
  19. Salomon, G (1979),Interaction of media, cognition and learning. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.Google Scholar
  20. Salomon, G. (1984). Television is easy and print is “tough”: The differential investment of mental effort in learning as a function of perceptions and attributions.Journal of Educational Psychology, 76(4), 647–658.Google Scholar
  21. Salomon, G., Perkins, D. N., and Globerson, T. (1991). Partners in cognition: Extending human intelligence with intelligent technologies.Educational Researcher, 20(2), 2–9.Google Scholar
  22. Schramm, W. (1977).Big media, little media. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  23. Winn, W. (1990). Media and instructional methods. In R. Ganisan, and D. Shue (Eds.),Education at a Distance. Malabu, FL: Krieger.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Association for Educational Communications and Technology 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • Richard E. Clark
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Division of Educational Psychology and Technology and Director of Professional StudiesUSA
  2. 2.the School of Education at the University of Southern California at Los AngelesUSA

Personalised recommendations