Trade-related intellectual property rights and product versus process innovations
- 79 Downloads
Abstract
The incentives of southern governments to protect process and product patents are examined in a game with endogenous research and development and licensing. Patent protection results in the licensing of cost-reducing process innovations to southern firms. By increasing competition, licensing provides an incentive for southern governments to protect process patents. However, optimal patent policy may involve restrictions in the form of licensing contracts. In the case of product innovations, licensing does not occur regardless of whether or not patents are protected. Thus, patent protection serves to reinforce monopoly power without increasing technology diffusion. Southern governments thus have a lower incentive to protect product patents.
Keywords
Intellectual Property Public Finance Process Innovation Product Innovation Lower IncentivePreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- Bagchi, Amiya Kumar; Bannerjee, Parthasarthy; Bhattacharya, Uttam Kumar. "Indian Patents Act and its Relation to Technological Development in India: A Preliminary Investigation,"Economic and Political Weekly, February 18, 1984, pp. 287–304.Google Scholar
- Butler, Alison. "The Trade Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights: What is at Stake?,"Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Review, 72, 6, November/December 1990, pp. 34–46.Google Scholar
- Chin, Judith, C.; Grossman, Gene, M. "Intellectual Property Rights and North-South Trade," in Ronald W. Jones,; Anne O. Krueger, eds.,The Political Economy of International Trade: Essays in Honor of Robert E. Baldwin, Oxford, MA: Blackwell, 1990, pp. 90–107.Google Scholar
- Deardorff, Alan V. "Welfare Effects of Global Patent Protection,"Economica, 59, 233, February 1992, pp. 35–51.Google Scholar
- Diwan, Ishac; Rodrik, Dani. "Patents, Appropriate Technology, and North-South Trade,"Journal of International Economics, 30, 1–2, February 1991, pp. 27–47.Google Scholar
- Gallini, Nancy; Wright, Brian. "Technology Transfer under Asymmetric Information,"Rand Journal of Economics, 21, 1, Spring 1990, pp. 147–60.Google Scholar
- Katz, Michael L; Shapiro, Carl. "On the Licensing of Innovations,"Rand Journal of Economics, 16, 4, Winter 1985, pp. 504–20.Google Scholar
- Rapp, Richard T; Rozek, Richard P.Benefits and Costs of Intellectual Property Protection in Developing Countries, National Economic Research Associates, Working Paper 3, June 1990.Google Scholar
- Rockett, Katherine. "The Quality of Licensed Technology,"International Journal of Industrial Organization, 8, 4, December 1990, pp. 559–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Taylor, Scott M. "TRIPs, Trade, and Technology Transfer,"Canadian Journal of Economics, 26, 3, August 1993, pp. 625–37.Google Scholar
- Vishwasrao, Sharmila. "Intellectual Property Rights and the Mode of Technology Transfer,"Journal of Development Economics, 44, 2, August 1994, 381–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar