, Volume 66, Issue 4, pp 507–514 | Cite as

A scaled difference chi-square test statistic for moment structure analysis

  • Albert SatorraEmail author
  • Peter M. Bentler


A family of scaling corrections aimed to improve the chi-square approximation of goodness-of-fit test statistics in small samples, large models, and nonnormal data was proposed in Satorra and Bentler (1994). For structural equations models, Satorra-Bentler's (SB) scaling corrections are available in standard computer software. Often, however, the interest is not on the overall fit of a model, but on a test of the restrictions that a null model sayM0 implies on a less restricted oneM1. IfT0 andT1 denote the goodness-of-fit test statistics associated toM0 andM1, respectively, then typically the differenceT d =T0T1 is used as a chi-square test statistic with degrees of freedom equal to the difference on the number of independent parameters estimated under the modelsM0 andM1. As in the case of the goodness-of-fit test, it is of interest to scale the statisticT d in order to improve its chi-square approximation in realistic, that is, nonasymptotic and nonormal, applications. In a recent paper, Satorra (2000) shows that the difference between two SB scaled test statistics for overall model fit does not yield the correct SB scaled difference test statistic. Satorra developed an expression that permits scaling the difference test statistic, but his formula has some practical limitations, since it requires heavy computations that are not available in standard computer software. The purpose of the present paper is to provide an easy way to compute the scaled difference chi-square statistic from the scaled goodness-of-fit test statistics of modelsM0 andM1. A Monte Carlo study is provided to illustrate the performance of the competing statistics.

Key words

moment-structures goodness-of-fit test chi-square difference test statistic chi-square distribution nonnormality 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Bentler, P.M. (1995).EQS structural equations program manual. Encino, CA: Multivariate Software.Google Scholar
  2. Bentler, P.M., & Dudgeon, P. (1996). Covariance structure analysis: Statistical practice, theory, and directions.Annual Review of Psychology, 47, 541–570.Google Scholar
  3. Bentler, P.M., & Yuan, K.-H. (1999). Structural equation modeling with small samples: Test statistics.Multivariate Behavioral Research, 34, 183–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bollen, K.A. (1989).Structural equations with latent variables. New York, NY: Wiley.Google Scholar
  5. Browne, M.W. (1984). Asymptotically distribution-free methods for the analysis of covariance structures.British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 37, 62–83.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Byrne, B.M., & Campbell, T.L. (1999). Cross-cultural comparisons and the presumption of equivalent measurement and theoretical structure: A look beneath the surface.Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 30, 557–576.Google Scholar
  7. Chou, C.-P., Bentler, P.M., & Satorra, A. (1991). Scaled test statistics and robust standard errors for nonnormal data in covariance structure analysis: A Monte Carlo study.British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 44, 347–357.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Curran, P.J., West, S.G., & Finch, J.F. (1996). The robustness of test statistics to nonnormality and specification error in confirmatory factor analysis.Psychological Methods, 1, 16–29.Google Scholar
  9. Fuller, W.A. (1987).Measurement error models. New York, NY: Wiley.Google Scholar
  10. Hu, L., Bentler, P.M., & Kano, Y. (1992). Can test statistics in covariance structure analysis be trusted?Psychological Bulletin, 112, 351–362.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Jöreskog, K., & Sörbom, D. (1994).LISREL 8 user's reference guide. Mooresville, IN: Scientific Software.Google Scholar
  12. Kano, Y. (1992). Robust statistics for test-of-independence and related structural models.Statistics and Probability Letters, 15, 21–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Magnus, J., & Neudecker, H. (1999).Matrix differential calculus with applications in statistics and econometrics. (rev. ed.) New York, NY: Wiley.Google Scholar
  14. Muthén, B. (1993). Goodness of fit test with categorical and other nonnormal variables. In K.A. Bollen & J.S. Long (Eds.),Testing structural equation models (pp. 205–234). Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  15. Rao, C.R., (1973).Linear statistical inference and its applications (2nd. ed.). New York, NY: Wiley.Google Scholar
  16. Satorra, A. (1989). Alternative test criteria in covariance structure analysis: A unified approach.Psychometrika, 54, 131–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Satorra, A. (1992). Asymptotic robust inferences in the analysis of mean and covariance structures.Sociological Methodology, 22, 249–278.Google Scholar
  18. Satorra, A. (2000). Scaled and adjusted restricted tests in multisample analysis of moment structures. In D.D.H. Heijmans, D.S.G. Pollock, & A. Satorra (Eds.),Innovations in multivariate statistical analysis: A Festschrift for Heinz Neudecker (pp. 233–247). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  19. Satorra, A., & Bentler, P.M. (1986). Some robustness properties of goodness of fit statistics in covariance structure analysis.1986 ASA Proceedings of the Business and Economic Statistics Section (549–554). Alexandria, VA: American Statistical Association.Google Scholar
  20. Satorra, A., & Bentler, P.M. (1988a). Scaling corrections for chi-square statistics in covariance structure analysis.ASA 1988 Proceedings of the Business and Economic Statistics Section (308–313). Alexandria, VA: American Statistical Association.Google Scholar
  21. Satorra, A., & Bentler, P.M. (1988b).Scaling corrections for statistics in covariance structure analysis (UCLA Statistics Series #2). Los Angeles, CA: University of California.Google Scholar
  22. Satorra, A., & Bentler, P.M. (1994). Corrections to test statistics and standard errors in covariance structure analysis. In A. von Eye & C.C. Clogg (Eds.),Latent variables analysis: Applications for developmental research (pp. 399–419). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  23. Yuan, K.-H., & Bentler, P.M. (1997). Mean and covariance structure analysis: Theoretical and practical improvements.Journal of The American Statistical Association, 92, 767–774.Google Scholar
  24. Yuan, K.-H., & Bentler, P.M. (1998). Normal theory based test statistics in structural equation modelling.British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 51, 289–309.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Psychometric Society 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Universitat Pompeu FabraBarcelonaSpain
  2. 2.University of CaliforniaLos Angeles

Personalised recommendations