A joint Bayesian estimation procedure for the estimation of parameters in the three-parameter logistic model is developed in this paper. Procedures for specifying prior beliefs for the parameters are given. It is shown through simulation studies that the Bayesian procedure (i) ensures that the estimates stay in the parameter space, and (ii) produces better estimates than the joint maximum likelihood procedure as judged by such criteria as mean squared differences between estimates and true values.
Key wordsBayes estimation three-parameter logistic model item response theory
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Hambleton, R. K., & Rovinelli, R. (1973). A FORTRAN IV program for generating examinees response data from logistic test models.Behavioral Science, 18, 74.Google Scholar
- Hambleton, R. K., Swaminathan, H., Cook, L. L., Eignor, D. R., & Gifford, J. A. (1978). Developments in latent train theory: Models, technical issues, and applications.Review of Educational Research, 48, 467–510.Google Scholar
- Lindley, D. V., & Smith, A. F. (1972). Bayesian estimates for the linear model.Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 34, (Series B), 1–41.Google Scholar
- Lord, F. M. (1980). Applications of item response theory to practical testing problems. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlebaum.Google Scholar
- Novick, M. R., & Jackson, P. H. (1974).Statistical methods for educational and psychological research. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
- Swaminathan, H., & Gifford, J. A. (1982). Bayesian estimation in the Rasch model.Journal of Educational Statistics, 7, 175–192.Google Scholar
- Urry, V. W. (1976). Ancilliary estimators for the item parameters of mental tests. In W. A. Gorham (Chair),Computerized testing: Steps toward the inevitable conquest (PS-76-1). Washington, DC: US Civil Service Commission, Personnel Research and Development Center.Google Scholar
- Wood, R. L., Wingersky, M. S., & Lord, F. M. (1978).LOGIST: A computer program for estimating ability and item characteristic curve parameters (Research Memorandum 76-6, rev. ed.). Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.Google Scholar