Psychometrika

, Volume 54, Issue 3, pp 371–384

Model modification

  • Dag Sörbom
Article

Abstract

An analysis of empirical data often leads to a rejection of a hypothesized model, even if the researcher has spent considerable efforts in including all available information in the formulation of the model. Thus, the researcher must reformulate the model in some way, but in most instances there is, at least theoretically, an overwhelming number of possible actions that could be taken. In this paper a “modification index” will be discussed which should serve as a guide in the search for a “better” model. In statistical terms, the index measures how much we will be able to reduce the discrepancy between model and data, as defined by a general fit function, when one parameter is added or freed or when one equality constraint is relaxed. The modification index discussed in this paper is an improvement of the one incorporated in the LISREL V computer program in that it takes into account changes in all the parameters of the model when one particular parameter is freed.

Key words

model modification maximum likelihood estimation factor analysis structural equation models step-wise regression 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aitchison, J., & Silvey, D. C. (1958). Maximum likelihood estimation of parameters subject to restraints,Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 29, 813–828.Google Scholar
  2. BMDP (1977).Biomedical computer programs. Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  3. Bollen, K. A. (1980). Issues in the comparative measurement of political democracy.American Sociological Review, 45, 370–390.Google Scholar
  4. Costner, H. L., & Schoenberg, R. (1972). Diagnosing indicator ills in multiple indicator models. In A. S. Goldberger & O. D. Duncan (Eds.), Structural education models in the social sciences (pp. 167–199). New York: Seminar Press.Google Scholar
  5. Dijkstra, T. K. (1981).Latent variables in linear stochastic models. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Groningen.Google Scholar
  6. Herting, J. R., & Costner, H. L. (1985). Respecification in multiple indicator models. In H. M. Blalock, Jr. (Ed.),Causal models in the social sciences (2nd ed., pp. 321–393). Hawthorne, NY: Aldine.Google Scholar
  7. Holzinger, K., & Swineford, F. (1939). A study in factor analysis: The stability of a bifactor solution.Supplementary Education Monography No.48. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  8. Jöreskog, K. G. (1969). A general approach to confirmatory maximum likelihood factor analysis.Psychometrika, 34, 183–202.Google Scholar
  9. Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (1981).LISREL V Analysis of linear structural relationships by maximum likelihood and least squares methods. Chicago: International Educational Services.Google Scholar
  10. Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (1984).LISREL VI Analysis of linear structural relationships by the method of maximum likelihood. Mooresville, IN: Scientific Software.Google Scholar
  11. Keeves, J. P. (1972).Educational environment and student achievement (Stockholm Studies in Educational Psychology No. 20). Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell.Google Scholar
  12. Lohnes, P. R. (1979). Factorial modeling in support of causal inference.American Educational Research Journal, 16, 323–340.Google Scholar
  13. MacCallum, R. (1986). Specification searches in covariance structure modeling.Psychological Bulletin, 100, 107–120.Google Scholar
  14. Rao, C. R. (1948). Large sample tests of statistical hypotheses concerning several parameters with application to problems of estimation.Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, 44, 50–57.Google Scholar
  15. Saris, W. E., de Pijper, W. M., & Zegwaart, P. (1979). Detection of specification errors in linear structural equation models.Sociological Methodology 1979.Google Scholar
  16. Sörbom, D. (1975). Detection of correlated errors in longitudinal data.British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 28, 138–151.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Psychometric Society 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dag Sörbom
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of StatisticsUniversity of UppsalaUppsalaSweden

Personalised recommendations