Psychometrika

, Volume 58, Issue 1, pp 37–52 | Cite as

The asymptotic posterior normality of the latent trait in an IRT model

  • Hua-Hua Chang
  • William Stout
Article

Abstract

It has long been part of the item response theory (IRT) folklore that under the usual empirical Bayes unidimensional IRT modeling approach, the posterior distribution of examinee ability given test response is approximately normal for a long test. Under very general and nonrestrictive nonparametric assumptions, we make this claim rigorous for a broad class of latent models.

Key words

item response theory empirical Bayes posterior distribution ability estimation confidence interval manifest probably Dutch Identity 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bock, R. D., & Mislevy, R. J. (1982). Adaptive EAP estimation of ability in a microcomputer environment.Applied Psychological Measurement, 6, 431–444.Google Scholar
  2. Chang, H. (1992).Some theoretical and applied results concerning item response theory model estimation. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Department of Statistics.Google Scholar
  3. Chang, H., & Stout, W. F. (1991).The asymptotic posterior normality of the latent trait in an IRT model (ONR Research Report 91-4). Urbana-Champaign: University of Illinois, Department of Statistics.Google Scholar
  4. Clarke, B. S., & Junker, B. W. (1991).Inference from the product of marginals of a dependent likelihood (Technical Report No. 508). Pittsburgh, PA: Carnegie Mellon University, Department of Statistics.Google Scholar
  5. Drasgow, F. (1987). A study of measurement bias of two standard psychological tests.Journal of Applied Psychology, 72, 19–30.Google Scholar
  6. Holland, P. W. (1990a). The Dutch identity: A new tool for the study of item response theory models.Psychometrika, 55, 5–18.Google Scholar
  7. Holland, P. W. (1990b). On the sampling theory foundations of item response theory models.Psychometrika, 55, 577–601.Google Scholar
  8. Lehmann, E. L. (1983).Theory of point estimation. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
  9. Lindley, D. V. (1965).Introduction to probability and statistics. Part 2: Inference. London: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Lord, F. M. (1980).Applications of item response theory to practical testing problems. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  11. Stout, W. F. (1974).Almost sure convergence. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  12. Stout, W. F. (1990). A new item response theory modeling approach with applications to unidimensionality assessment and ability estimation.Psychometrika, 55, 293–325.Google Scholar
  13. Wald, A. (1949). Note on the consistency of the maximum likelihood estimate.Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 20, 595–601.Google Scholar
  14. Walker, A. M. (1969). On the asymptotic behaviour of posterior distributions.Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 31, 80–88.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Psychometric Society 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hua-Hua Chang
    • 1
  • William Stout
    • 2
  1. 1.Educational Testing ServicePrinceton
  2. 2.Department of StatisticsUniversity of IllinoisChampaign

Personalised recommendations