Advertisement

Psychometrika

, Volume 50, Issue 2, pp 181–202 | Cite as

A dynamic factor model for the analysis of multivariate time series

  • Peter C. M. Molenaar
Article

Abstract

As a method to ascertain the structure of intra-individual variation,P-technique has met difficulties in the handling of a lagged covariance structure. A new statistical technique, coined dynamic factor analysis, is proposed, which accounts for the entire lagged covariance function of an arbitrary second order stationary time series. Moreover, dynamic factor analysis is shown to be applicable to a relatively short stretch of observations and therefore is considered worthwhile for psychological research. At several places the argumentation is clarified through the use of examples.

Keywords

Time Series Covariance Public Policy Statistical Technique Statistical Theory 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Anderson, T. W. (1963). The use of factor analysis in the statistical analysis of multiple time series.Psychometrika, 28, 1–25.Google Scholar
  2. Bentler, P. M., & Bonett, D. G. (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures.Psychological Bulletin, 88, 588–606.Google Scholar
  3. Box, G. E. P., & Jenkins, G. M. (1970).Time series analysis: Forecasting and control. San Francisco: Holden-Day.Google Scholar
  4. Box, G. E. P., & Tiao, G. C. (1977). A canonical analysis of multiple time series.Biometrika, 64, 355–365.Google Scholar
  5. Brillinger, D. R. (1975).Time series: Data analysis and theory. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
  6. Cattell, R. B. (1952)Factor analysis. New York: Harper.Google Scholar
  7. Cattell, R. B. (1957).Personality and motivation: Structure and measurement. Yonkers-on-Hudson: World Book.Google Scholar
  8. Cattell, R. B. (1963). The structuring of change byP-technique and incrementalR-technique. In C. W. Harris (Ed.),Problems in measuring change. Madison: The University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
  9. Duffy, E. (1962).Activation and behavior. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  10. Eiting, M. H., & Mellenbergh, G. J. (1980). Testing covariance matrix hypotheses: An example from the measurement of musical abilities.Multivariate Behavioral Research, 15, 203–223.Google Scholar
  11. Grossberg, S. (1982).Studies of mind and brain: Neural principles of learning, perception, development, cognition, and motor control. Dordrecht: Reidel.Google Scholar
  12. Hannan, E. J. (1970).Multiple time series. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  13. Haykin, S. (Ed.). (1979).Nonlinear methods of spectral analysis. New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
  14. Holtzman, W. H. (1962). Methodological issues inP-technique.Psychological Bulletin, 59, 243–256.Google Scholar
  15. Holtzman, W. H. (1963). Statistical methods for the study of change in the single case. In C. W. Harris (Ed.),Problems in measuring change. Madison: The University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
  16. Hutt, S. J., Lenard, H. G., & Prechtl, H. F. R. (1969). Psychophysiological studies in newborn infants. In L. P. Lipsitt & H. W. Reese (Eds.),Advances in child development and behavior. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  17. Jazwinsky, A. H. (1970).Stochastic processes and filtering theory. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  18. Jenkins, G. M., & Watts, D. G. (1968).Spectrum analysis and its applications. San Francisco: Holden-Day.Google Scholar
  19. Jöreskog, K. G. (1976).Structural equation models in the social sciences: Specification, estimation, and testing (Research Rep. 76-9). Uppsala: University of Uppsala.Google Scholar
  20. Jöreskog, K. G. (1978). Structural analysis of covariance and correlation matrices.Psychometrika, 43, 443–477.Google Scholar
  21. Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (1978).LISREL IV: Analysis of linear structural relationships by the method of maximum likelihood. Chicago: International Educational Services.Google Scholar
  22. Kashyap, R. L., & Rao, R. A. (1976).Dynamic stochastic models from empirical data. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  23. Molenaar, P. C. M. (1981).Dynamical factor models. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, State University of Utrecht, Utrecht.Google Scholar
  24. Molenaar, P. C. M. (1982a, September).A dynamic factor model for short sample paths of a time series. Paper presented at the meeting of the European Mathematical Psychology, Bielefeld, West-Germany.Google Scholar
  25. Molenaar, P. C. M. (1982b).On the validity of basic ERP waveforms obtained by principal component analysis and by confirmatory component analysis. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
  26. Molenaar, P. C. M. (1984, August).Dynamic factor analysis of a multivariate non-stationary time series. Paper presented at the meeting of the European Mathematical Psychology, Zeist, Holland.Google Scholar
  27. Porges, S. W., Bohrer, R. E., Keren, G., Cheung, M. N., Franks, G. J., & Drasgow, F. (1981). The influence of methylphenidate on spontaneous autonomic activity and behavior in children diagnosed as hyperactive.Psychophysiology, 18, 42–48.Google Scholar
  28. Priestley, M. B., Subba Rao, T., & Tong, H. (1973). Identification of the structure of multivariable stochastic systems. In P. R. Krishnaiah (Ed.),Multivariate analysis III. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  29. Stone, R. (1947). On the interdependence of blocks of transactions.Journal of the Royal Statistical Society B, 9, 1–32.Google Scholar
  30. Subba Rao, T. (1975). An innovation approach to the reduction of the dimensions in a multivariate stochastic system.International Journal of Control, 21, 673–680.Google Scholar
  31. Subba Rao, T., & Tong, H. (1974). Identification of the covariance structure of state space models.Bulletin of the Institute of Mathematics and its Applications, 10, 201–203.Google Scholar
  32. Tukey, J. W. (1978, May). Can we predict where “time series” should go next? In D. R. Brillinger & G. C. Tiao (Eds.),Directions in time series. Proceedings of the IMS special topics meeting on time series analysis, Iowa State University, Ames.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Psychometric Society 1985

Authors and Affiliations

  • Peter C. M. Molenaar
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of AmsterdamAmsterdamThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations