Skip to main content
Log in

Bayesian estimation in the two-parameter logistic model

  • Published:
Psychometrika Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A Bayesian procedure is developed for the estimation of parameters in the two-parameter logistic item response model. Joint modal estimates of the parameters are obtained and procedures for the specification of prior information are described. Through simulation studies it is shown that Bayesian estimates of the parameters are superior to maximum likelihood estimates in the sense that they are (a) more meaningful since they do not drift out of range, and (b) more accurate in that they result in smaller mean squared differences between estimates and true values.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andersen, E. B. (1972). The numerical solution of a set of conditional estimation equations.The Journal of the Royal Statistical Society (Series B),34, 42–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birnbaum, A. (1969). Statistical theory for logistic mental test models with a prior distribution of ability.Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 6, 258–276.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bock, R. D., & Aitkin, M. (1981). Marginal maximum likelihood estimation of item parameters: An application of the EM algorithm.Psychometrika, 46, 443–460.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bock, R. D., & Lieberman, M. (1970). Fitting a response model forn dichotomously scored items.Psychometrika, 35, 179–197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haberman, S. (1975). Maximum likelihood estimates in exponential response models.The Annals of Statistics, 5, 815–841.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hambleton, R. K., & Rovinelli, R. (1973). A FORTRAN IV program for generating examinees response data from logistic test models.Behavioral Science, 18, 74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, N. L., & Welch, B. L. (1939). On the calculation of the cumulants of the x distribution.Biometrika, 31, 216–218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kendall, M. G., & Stuart, A. (1973).The advanced theory of statistics: Vol. I. New York: Hafner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiefer, J., & Wolfowitz, J. (1956). Consistency of the maximum likelihood estimates in the presence of infinitely many incidental parameters.Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 27, 887–890.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindley, D. V. (1971). The estimation of many parameters. In V. P. Godambe & D. A. Sprott (Eds.),Foundations of Statistical Inference. Toronto: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston, pp. 435–455.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindley, D. V., & Smith, A. F. (1972). Bayesian estimates for the linear model.Journal of the Royal Statistical Society (Series B),34, 1–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lord, F. M. (1968). An analysis of the Verbal Scholastic Aptitude Test using Birnbaum's three-parameter logistic model.Educational and Psychological Measurement, 28, 989–1020.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lord, F. M. (1980).Applications of item response theory to practical testing problems. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lord, F. M. & Novick, M. R. (1968).Statistical theories of mental test scores. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loyd, B. H., & Hoover, H. D. (1980). Vertical equating using the Rasch model.Journal of Educational Measurement, 17, 179–193.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neyman, J., & Scott, E. L. (1948). Consistent estimates based on partially consistent observations.Econometrica, 16, 1–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Novick, M. R., & Jackson, P. (1974).Statistical methods for educational and psychological research. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Novick, M. R., Lewis, C., & Jackson, P. H. (1973). The estimation of proportions inm groups.Psychometrika, 38, 19–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Owen, R. (1975). A Bayesian sequential procedure for quantal response in the context of adaptive mental testing.Journal of the American Statistical Association, 70, 351–356.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slinde, J. A. & Linn, R. L. (1979). A note on vertical equating via the Rasch model for groups of quite different ability and tests of quite different difficulty.Journal of Educational Measurement, 16, 159–165.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swaminathan, H., & Gifford, J. A. (1982). Bayesian estimation in the Rasch model.Journal of Educational Statistics, 7, 175–191.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swaminathan, H., & Gifford, J. A. (1983). Estimation of parameters in the three-parameter latent trait model. In D. J. Weiss (Ed.),New horizons in testing. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, R. L., Wingersky, M. S., & Lord, F. M. (1976). A computer program for estimating examinee ability and item characteristic curve parameters (Research Memorandum 76-6). Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service. (Revised 1978)

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, B. D. (1977). Solving measurement problems with the Rasch model.Journal of Educational Measurement, 14, 97–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zellner, A. (1971).An introduction to Bayesian inference in econometrics, New York: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

The research reported here was performed pursuant to Grant No. N0014-79-C-0039 with the Office of Naval Research.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Swaminathan, H., Gifford, J.A. Bayesian estimation in the two-parameter logistic model. Psychometrika 50, 349–364 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02294110

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02294110

Key words

Navigation