Skip to main content
Log in

Factor indeterminacy in the 1930's and the 1970's some interesting parallels

  • Published:
Psychometrika Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The issue of factor indeterminacy, and its meaning and significance for factor analysis, has been the subject of considerable debate in recent years. Interestingly, the identical issue was discussed widely in the literature of the late 1920's and early 1930's, but this early discussion was somehow lost or forgotten during the development and popularization of multiple factor analysis. There are strong parallels between the arguments in the early literature, and those which have appeared in recent papers. Here I review the history of this early literature, briefly survey the more recent work, and discuss these parallels where they are especially illuminating.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Camp, B. H. The converse of Spearman's two-factor theorem.Biometrika, 1932,24, 418–427.

    Google Scholar 

  • Camp, B. H. Spearman's general factor again.Biometrika, 1934,26, 260–261.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dodd, S. C. The theory of factors, I.Psychological Review, 1928a,35, 211–234.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dodd, S. C. The theory of factors, II.Psychological Review, 1928b,35, 261–279.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garnett, J. C. General ability, cleverness, and purpose.British Journal of Psychology, 1919,9, 345–366.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garnett, J. C. The single general factor in dissimilar mental measurements.British Journal of Psychology, 1920,10, 242–258.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gorsuch, R. L.Factor analysis. Philadelphia: Saunders, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, B. F. On the factor score controversy.Psychometrika, 1976,41, 263–266.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guttman, L. The determinacy of factor score matrices with implications for five other basic problems of common factor theory.British Journal of Statistical Psychology, 1955,8, 65–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guttman, L. “Best possible” systematic estimates of communalities.Psychometrika, 1956,21, 273–285.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harman, H. H.Modern factor analysis (2nd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, C. W. On factors and factor scores.Psychometrika, 1967,32, 363–379.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart, B., & Spearman, C. General ability, its existence and nature.British Journal of Psychology, 1912,5, 51–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heermann, E. F. The geometry of factorial indeterminancy.Psychometrika, 1964,29, 371–381.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heermann, E. F. The algebra of factorial indeterminancy.Psychometrika, 1966,31, 539–543.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heywood, H. B. On finite sequences of real numbers.Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, 1931,134, 486–501.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holzinger, K. J., & Harman, H. H.Factor analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1941.

    Google Scholar 

  • Irwin, J. O. On the uniqueness of the factorg for general intelligence.British Journal of Psychology, 1932,22, 359–363.

    Google Scholar 

  • Irwin, J. O. On the indeterminacy in the estimate ofg.British Journal of Psychology, 1935,25, 393–394.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kestelman, H. The fundamental equation of factor analysis.British Journal of Psychology, Statistical Section, 1952,5, 1–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ledermann, W. The orthogonal transformation of a factorial matrix into itself.Psychometrika, 1938,3, 181–187.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDonald, R. P. The measurement of factor indeterminacy.Psychometrika, 1974,39, 203–221.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDonald, R. P., & Burr, E. J. A comparison of four methods of constructing factor scores.Psychometrika, 1967,32, 381–401.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, E. P. On the relationship between ratio of number of variables to number of factors and factorial indeterminacy.Psychometrika, 1973,38, 375–378.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulaik, S. A.The foundations of factor analysis. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulaik, S. A. Comments on ‘the measurement of factorial indeterminacy.’Psychometrika, 1976,41, 249–262.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulaik, S. A., & McDonald, R. P. The effect of additional variables on factor indeterminancy in models with a single common factor.Psychometrika, 1978,43, 177–192.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piaggio, H. T. H. The general factor in Spearman's theory of intelligence.Nature, 1931,127, 56–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piaggio, H. T. H. Three sets of conditions necessary for the existence of ag that is real and unique except in sign.British Journal of Psychology, 1933,24, 88–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piaggio, H. T. H. Approximate general and specific factors without indeterminate parts.British Journal of Psychology, 1935,25, 485–489.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piaggio, H. T. H., & Dallas, A. E. M. N. An analysis of recent tests of the two-factor theory.British Journal of Psychology, 1934,25, 217–220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schönemann, P. H. The minimum average correlation between equivalent sets of uncorrelated factors.Psychometrika, 1971,36, 21–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schönemann, P. H., & Wang, M. M. Some new results on factor indeterminacy.Psychometrika, 1972,37, 61–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schönemann, P. H., & Steiger, J. H. Regression component analysis.British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 1976,29, 175–189.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schönemann, P. H., & Steiger, J. H. On the validity of indeterminate factor scores.Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 1978,12, 287–290.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spearman, C. General intelligence, objectively determined and measured.American Journal of Psychology, 1904,15, 201–293.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spearman, C. Correlation between arrays in a table of correlations.Proceedings of the Royal Society, Series A, 1922,101, 94–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spearman, C.The abilities of man. New York: MacMillan, 1927.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spearman, C. The uniqueness of ‘g’.Journal of Educational Psychology, 1933,24, 106–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spearman, C. The factor theory and its troubles. IV. Uniqueness ofg.Journal of Educational Psychology, 1934,25, 142–153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steiger, J. H., The relationship between external variables and indeterminate factors.Psychometrika, 1979,44, 93–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomson, G. H. A hierarchy without a general factor.British Journal of Psychology, 1916,8, 271–281.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomson, G. H. The hierarchy of abilities.British Journal of Psychology, 1919,9, 337–344.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomson, G. H. The meaning of ‘i’ in the measurement of ‘g’ (general intelligence).Journal of Educational Psychology, 1935,26, 241–262.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thurstone, L. L.The vectors of mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1935.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thurstone, L. L.Multiple factor analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1947.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, J. S. A definition for the common factor model and the elimination of problems of factor score indeterminancy.Psychometrika, 1978,43, 293–306.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, E. B. Review of ‘The abilities of man, their nature and measurement’ by C. Spearman.Science, 1928a,67, 244–248.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, E. B. On hierarchical correlation systems.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 1928b,14, 283–291.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, E. B. Review of ‘Crossroads in the mind of man: A study of differentiable mental abilities’ by T. L. Kelley.Journal of General Psychology, 1929a,2, 153–169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, E. B. Comments on Professor Spearman's note.Journal of Educational Psychology, 1929b,20, 217–223.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolfle, D. Factor analysis to 1940.Psychometric Monographs, No. 3, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1940.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Support by the NRC (Grant No. A4640) and the University of British Columbia (UBC Humanities and Social Sciences Grant 26-9508) is gratefully acknowledged.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Steiger, J.H. Factor indeterminacy in the 1930's and the 1970's some interesting parallels. Psychometrika 44, 157–167 (1979). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02293967

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02293967

Key words

Navigation