, Volume 41, Issue 3, pp 321–327 | Cite as

Determining the number of components from the matrix of partial correlations

  • Wayne F. Velicer


A common problem for both principal component analysis and image component analysis is determining how many components to retain. A number of solutions have been proposed, none of which is totally satisfactory. An alternative solution which employs a matrix of partial correlations is considered. No components are extracted after the average squared partial correlation reaches a minimum. This approach gives an exact stopping point, has a direct operational interpretation, and can be applied to any type of component analysis. The method is most appropriate when component analysis is employed as an alternative to, or a first-stage solution for, factor analysis.

Key words

common variance factor analysis image component analysis 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Reference note

  1. Howe, W. G.Some contributions to factor analysis (Report No. ONRL-1919). Oak Ridge, Tenn.: Oak Ridge National Laboratory, 1955.Google Scholar


  1. Bartlett, M. S. Tests of significance in factor analysis.The British Journal of Psychology, 1950,3 (Part II), 77–85.Google Scholar
  2. Bartlett, M. S. A further note on tests of significance in factor analysis.The British Journal of Psychology, 1951,4 (Part I), 1–2.Google Scholar
  3. Bechtoldt, H. P. An empirical study of the factor analysis stability hypothesis.Psychometrika, 1961,26, 405–432.Google Scholar
  4. Cattell, R. B. The scree test for the number of factors.Multivariate Behavioral Research, 1966,1, 245–276.Google Scholar
  5. Emmett, W. C. Factor analysis by Lawley's method of maximum likelihood.British Journal of Psychology, Statistical Section, 1949, 2, 90–97.Google Scholar
  6. Gorsuch, R. L. Using Bartlett's significance test to determine the number of factors to extract.Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1973,33, 361–364.Google Scholar
  7. Harman, H. H.Modern factor analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1960.Google Scholar
  8. Harman, H. H., & Jones, W. H. Factor analysis by minimizing residuals (minres).Psychometrika, 1966,31, 351–368.Google Scholar
  9. Horst, P.Factor analysis of data matrices. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, 1965.Google Scholar
  10. Jöreskog, K. G. Some contributions to maximum likelihood factor analysis.Psychometrika, 1967,32, 443–482.Google Scholar
  11. Kaiser, H. F. The application of electronic computers to factor analysis.Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1960,20, 141–151.Google Scholar
  12. Lord, F. M. A study of speed factors in tests and academic grades.Psychometrika, 1956,21, 31–50.Google Scholar
  13. Maxwell, E. A. Recent trends in factor analysis.Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A, 1961,124, 49–59.Google Scholar
  14. Schönemann, P. H., & Wang, M. Some new results on factor indeterminacy.Psychometrika, 1972,37, 61–91.Google Scholar
  15. Thurstone, L. L. The dimensions of temperament.Psychometrika, 1951,16, 11–20.Google Scholar
  16. Van de Geer, J. P.Introduction to multivariate analysis for the social sciences. San Francisco: Freeman, 1971.Google Scholar
  17. Velicer, W. F. An empirical comparison of the stability of factor analysis, principal component analysis, and image analysis.Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1974,34, 563–572.Google Scholar
  18. Velicer, W. F. The relation between factor score estimates, image scores, and principal component scores.Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1976,36, 149–159.Google Scholar
  19. Velicer, W. F. An empirical comparison of the similarity of principal component, image, and factor patterns.Multivariate Behavioral Research, in press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Psychometric Society 1976

Authors and Affiliations

  • Wayne F. Velicer
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of Rhode IslandKingston, R. I.

Personalised recommendations