Advertisement

Pharmaceutisch weekblad

, Volume 1, Issue 1, pp 201–206 | Cite as

Biopharmaceutics of rectal administration of drugs in man

3. Absorption rate and bioavailability of paracetamol from rectal aqueous suspensions
  • F. Moolenaar
  • L. Olthof
  • T. Huizinga
Original Articles

Abstract

In this report it will be shown that rectally administered paracetamol may be regarded as an alternative to oral administration.

Plasma paracetamol and paracetamol-glucuronide concentrations were measured in 6 volunteers after single oral (1000 mg) and rectal (500 mg and 1000 mg) doses of the drug, suspended in aqueous vehicles.

Compared with oral administration rectal absorption can be equally rapid depending on the volume of administered suspension. This effect is due to differences in absorption surface involved in the human rectum. Relative bioavailability has been found in the same range for the oral and rectal route of administration. The results indicate that rectally administered paracetamol does not reach the general circulation without liver passage.

It is concluded that hepatic first pass metabolism is strongly dependent upon the rate of uptake of paracetamol from the rectum.

Keywords

Paracetamol Relative Bioavailability Rectal Administration Pass Metabolism Sennoside 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Boer, A. G. De, J. M. Gubbens-Slibbe, G. H. P. De Koning andD. D. Breimer (1977)Abstracts FIP Congress, The Hague.Google Scholar
  2. Feldman, S. (1975) Bioavailability of Acetaminophen suppositories,Am. J. Hosp. Pharm. 32, 1173–1175.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Gibaldi, M., andD. Perrier (1974) in:Drug metabolism Reviews, Vol. 3. Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York.Google Scholar
  4. Ginneken, C. A. M. Van (1976)Pharmacokinetics of antipyretic and antiinflammatory analgesics. Thesis, Nijmegen.Google Scholar
  5. Heading, R. C., J. Nimmo, L. F. Prescott andP. Tothill (1973) The dependence of paracetamol absorption on gastric emptying,Brit. J. Pharmacol. 47, 415–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Jonkman, J. H. G. (1977)Thiazinamium methylsulphate, bioanalysis and pharmacokinetics. Thesis, Groningen.Google Scholar
  7. Keinänen, S., M. Hietula, S. Similä andK. Kouvalainen (1977) Comparison of rectal and oral paracetamol,Europ. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 12, 77–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Moës, A., andF. Jaminet (1976) Influence of ageing of suppositories on rectal absorption of paracetamol,Pharm. Acta Helv. 51, 119–126.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Prescott, L. F. (1971) Gas-liquid Chromatographic estimation of paracetamol,J. Pharm. Pharmacol. 23, 807–808.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Rawlings, M. D., D. B. Henderson andA. R. Hijab (1977) Pharmacokinetics of paracetamol (acetaminophen) after intravenous and oral administration,Europ. J. Clin. Pharmacol 11, 283–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Bohn, Scheltema & Holkema 1979

Authors and Affiliations

  • F. Moolenaar
    • 1
  • L. Olthof
    • 1
  • T. Huizinga
    • 1
  1. 1.Laboratorium voor Farmacotherapie en ReceptuurGroningenThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations