Skip to main content
Log in

Bias and runs in dice throwing and recording: A few million throws

  • Published:
Psychometrika Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

An experimenter threw individually 219 different dice of four different brands and recorded even and odd outcomes for one block of 20,000 trials for each die—4,380,000 throws in all. The resulting data on runs offer a basis for comparing the observed properties of such a physical randomizing process with theory and with simulations based on pseudo-random numbers and RAND Corporation random numbers. Although generally the results are close to those forecast by theory, some notable exceptions raise questions about the surprise value that should be associated with occurrences two standard deviations from the mean. These data suggest that the usual significance level may well actually be running from 7 to 15 percent instead of the theoretical 5 percent.

The data base is the largest of its kind. A set generated by one brand of dice contains 2,000,000 bits and is the first handmade empirical data of such size to fail to show a significant departure from ideal theory in either location or scale.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson, T. W.An introduction to multivariate statistical analysis. New York: Wiley, 1958.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartlett, M. S. Tests of significance in factor analysis.British Journal of Psychology, Stat. Sec., 1950, 3, 77–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feller, W.An introduction to probability theory and its applications, Vol. I, Third edition. New York: Wiley, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fry, T. C.Probability and its engineering uses, Second edition. Princeton, New Jersey: Van Nostrand, 1965. pp. 312–316.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerrich, J. E.An experimental introduction to the theory of probability. Copenhagen: Belgisk Import Co., 1946.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kullback, S.Information theory and statistics. New York: Wiley, 1959. p. 302.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mood, A. M. The distribution theory of runs.Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 1940,11, 367–392.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mosteller, F., Youtz, C. & Zahn, D. The distribution of sums of rounded percentages.Demography, 1967,4, 850–858.

    Google Scholar 

  • Owen, D. B.Handbook of statistical tables. Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley, 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  • The RAND Corporation.A million random digits with 100,000 normal deviates. Glencoe, Illinois: Free Press, 1955.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Additional information

The analysis was facilitated by a National Science Foundation grant GS-341 and and its continuation GS-2044X. It forms part of a larger study of data analysis.

Mr. Longcor is from Waukegan, Illinois; the other authors are from Harvard University. Dr. Iversen has moved to the University of Michigan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Iversen, G.R., Longcor, W.H., Mosteller, F. et al. Bias and runs in dice throwing and recording: A few million throws. Psychometrika 36, 1–19 (1971). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02291418

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02291418

Keywords

Navigation