, Volume 37, Issue 4, pp 357–375 | Cite as

Beyond structure: In search of functional models of psychological process

  • Samuel Messick


Public Policy Statistical Theory Psychological Process Functional Model 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Abelson, R. P. Computer simulation of “hot” cognition. In S. S. Tomkin & S. Messick (Eds.),Computer simulation of personality. New York: Wiley, 1963.Google Scholar
  2. Abelson, R. P. Simulation of social behavior. In G. Lindzey & E. Aronson (Eds.),The handbook of social psychology, (2nd ed.). Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley, 1968, 274–356.Google Scholar
  3. Allison, R. B. Learning parameters and human abilities. ONR Technical Report. Princeton, N. J.: Educational Testing Service, 1960.Google Scholar
  4. Anastasi, A. On the formation of psychological traits.American Psychologist, 1970,10, 899–910.Google Scholar
  5. Bandura, A. & Walters, R. H.Social learning and personality development. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1963.Google Scholar
  6. Bunderson, C. V. Transfer of mental abilities at different stages of practice in the solution of concept problems. Research Bulletin 67-20. Princeton, N. J.: Educational Testing Service, 1967.Google Scholar
  7. Campbell, D. T. Recommendations for APA test standards regarding construct, trait, or discriminant validity.American Psychologist, 1960,8, 546–553.Google Scholar
  8. Carroll, J. B. Stalking the wayward factors.Contemporary Psychology, 1972,17, 321–324.Google Scholar
  9. Cattell, R. B. The measurement of adult intelligence.Psychological Bulletin, 1943,40, 153–193.Google Scholar
  10. Cattell, R. B. Theory of fluid and crystallized intelligence: A critical experiment.Journal of Educational Psychology, 1963,54, 1–22.Google Scholar
  11. Cattell, R. B.Abilities: Their structure, growth, and action. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Co., 1971.Google Scholar
  12. Cole, M. & Bruner, J. S. Cultural differences and inferences about psychological processes.American Psychologist, 1971,26, 867–876.Google Scholar
  13. Cole, M., Gay, J., Glick, J., & Sharp, D. W.The cultural context of learning and thinking. New York: Basic Books, 1971.Google Scholar
  14. Cronbach, L. J. The two disciplines of scientific psychology.American Psychologist, 1957,11, 671–684.Google Scholar
  15. Damarin, F. L., Jr., & Cattell, R. B. Personality factors in early childhood and their relation to intelligence.Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 1968,32, 6 (Serial No. 122).Google Scholar
  16. Dewey, J.How we think. Boston: Heath, 1910.Google Scholar
  17. Duncanson, J. P. Intelligence and the ability to learn. Research Bulletin 64-29. Princeton, N. J.: Educational Testing Service, 1964.Google Scholar
  18. Dunham, J. L., & Bunderson, C. V. Effect of decision-rule instruction upon the relationship of cognitive abilities to performance in multiple-category concept problems.Journal of Educational Psychology, 1969,60, 121–125.Google Scholar
  19. Dunham, J. L., Guilford, J. P., & Hoepfner, R. Multivariate approaches to discovering the intellectual components of concept learning.Psychological Review, 1968,75, 206–221.Google Scholar
  20. Dyk, R. B., & Witkin, H. A. Family experiences related to the development of differentiation in children.Child Development, 1965,36, 21–55.Google Scholar
  21. Emmerich, W. Personality development and concepts of structure.Child Development, 1968,39, 671–690.Google Scholar
  22. Ferguson, G. A. On learning and human ability.Canadian Journal of Psychology, 1954,8, 95–111.Google Scholar
  23. Ferguson, G. A. On transfer and the abilities of man.Canadian Journal of Psychology, 1956,10, 121–131.Google Scholar
  24. Flavell, J. H.The development psychology of Jean Piaget. Princeton, N. J.: Van Nostrand, 1963.Google Scholar
  25. Fleishman, E. A. A comparative study of aptitude patterns in unskilled psychomotor performances.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1957,4, 263–272.Google Scholar
  26. Fleishman, E. A. Abilities at different stages of practice in rotary pursuit performance.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1960,60, 162–171.Google Scholar
  27. Fleishman, E. A. The description and prediction of perceptual-motor skill learning. In R. Glaser (Ed.),Training research and education. New York: Wiley, 1965, 137–176.Google Scholar
  28. Fleishman, E. A. Individual differences and motor learning. In R. M. Gagné (Ed.),Learning and individual differences. Columbus, Ohio: Merrill, 1967a.Google Scholar
  29. Fleishman, E. A. Development of a behavior taxonomy for describing human tasks: A correlational-experimental approach.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1967b,51, 1–10.Google Scholar
  30. Fleishman, E. A., & Hempel, W. E., Jr. Changes in factor structure of a complex psychomotor task as a function of practice.Psychometrika, 1954,19, 239–252.Google Scholar
  31. Fleishman, E. A., & Hempel, W. E., Jr. The relation between abilities and improvement with practice in a visual discrimination reaction task.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1955,49, 301–310.Google Scholar
  32. Fleishman, E. A., & Rich, S. Role of kinesthetic and spatial-visual abilities in perceptualmotor learning.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1963,66, 6–11.Google Scholar
  33. Frederiksen, C. H. Abilities, transfer, and information retrieval in verbal learning.Multivariate Behavioral Research Monograph 69–2, 1969.Google Scholar
  34. French, J. W. The relationship of problem-solving styles to the factor composition of tests.Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1965,25, 9–28.Google Scholar
  35. Gagné, R. M. Contributions of learning to human development.Psychological Review, 1968,3, 177–191.Google Scholar
  36. Games, P. A. A factorial analysis of verbal learning tasks.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1962,63, 1–11.Google Scholar
  37. Guilford, J. P.The nature of human intelligence. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1967.Google Scholar
  38. Harlow, H. F. The formation of learning sets.Psychological Review, 1949,56, 51–65.Google Scholar
  39. Hebb, D. O.The organization of behavior. New York: Wiley, 1949.Google Scholar
  40. Horn, J. L., & Cattell, R. B. Refinement and test of the theory of fluid and crystallized intelligence.Journal of Educational Psychology, 1966,57, 253–270.Google Scholar
  41. Hunt, E. Computer simulation: Artificial intelligence studies and their relevance to psychology.Annual Review of Psychology, 1968,19, 135–168.Google Scholar
  42. Hunt, J. McV.Intelligence and experience. New York: Ronald, 1961.Google Scholar
  43. Irvine, S. H. Factor analysis of African abilities and attainments: Constructs across cultures.Psychological Bulletin, 1969,71, 20–32.Google Scholar
  44. Jackson, P. W., & Messick, S. The person, the product, and the response: Conceptual problems in the assessment of creativity.Journal of Personality, 1965,33, 309–329.Google Scholar
  45. Kagan, J., & Kogan, N. Individual variation in cognitive processess. In P. H. Mussen (Ed.),Carmichael's manual of child psychology. New York: Wiley, 1970, 1273–1365.Google Scholar
  46. Kohfeld, D. L. The prediction of perceptual-motor learning from independent verbal and motor measures.Psychonomic Science. 1966,4, 413–414.Google Scholar
  47. Lashley, K. S. The problem of serial order in behavior. In L. A. Jeffress (Ed.),Cerebral mechanisms in behavior. New York: Wiley, 1951.Google Scholar
  48. Lesser, G. S., Fifer, G., & Clark, D. H. Mental abilities of children from different socialclass and cultural groups.Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 1965,30, 4 (Serial No. 102).Google Scholar
  49. MacArthur, R. Some differential abilities of Northern Canadian native youth.International Journal of Psychology, 1968,3, 43–51.Google Scholar
  50. Maccoby, E. E. Sex differences in intellectual functioning. In E. E. Maccoby (Ed.),The development of sex differences. Stanford, Cal.: Stanford University Press, 1966, 25–55.Google Scholar
  51. Manley, M. B. A factor analytic study of three types of concept attainment tasks. Research Bulletin 65-31. Princeton, N. J.: Educational Testing Service, 1965.Google Scholar
  52. McGeoch, J. A.The psychology of human learning. New York: Longmans, Green, 1942.Google Scholar
  53. Messick, S. Personality structure.Annual Review of Psychology, 1961,12, 93–128.Google Scholar
  54. Messick, S. The criterion problem in the evaluation of instruction: Assessing possible, not just intended outcomes. In M. C. Wittrock & D. E. Wiley (Eds.),The evaluation of instruction: Issues and problems. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston, 1970.Google Scholar
  55. Messick, S. Multivariate models of cognition and personality: The need for both process and structure in psychological theory and measurement. In J. Royce (Ed.),Contributions of multivariate analysis to theoretical psychology. New York: Academic Press, 1972.Google Scholar
  56. Messick, S., & Barrows, T. S. Strategies for research and evaluation in early childhood education. In I. Gordon (Ed.),Early childhood education, National Society for the Study of Education Yearbook, 1972, 261–290.Google Scholar
  57. Mowrer, O. H.Learning theory and personality dynamics. New York: Ronald, 1950.Google Scholar
  58. Mowrer, O. H.Learning theory and behavior. New York: Wiley, 1960.Google Scholar
  59. Neimark, E. D. Model for a thinking machine: An information-processing framework for the study of cognitive development.Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 1970,16, 345–368.Google Scholar
  60. Royce, J. Factors as theoretical constructs.American Psychologist, 1963,8, 522–528.Google Scholar
  61. Simon, H. A., & Newell A. Information processing in computer and man.American Scientist, 1964,52, 281–300.Google Scholar
  62. Solley, C. M., & Murphy, G.Development of the perceptual world. New York: Basic Books, 1960.Google Scholar
  63. Stake, R. E. Learning parameters, aptitudes, and achievements.Psychometric Monograph No. 9, 1961.Google Scholar
  64. Stodolsky, S. S., & Lesser, G. S. Learning patterns in the disadvantaged.Harvard Educational Review, 1967,37, 546–593.Google Scholar
  65. Thurstone, L. L. The stimulus-response fallacy in psychology.Psychological Review, 1923,30, 354–369.Google Scholar
  66. Tomkins, S. The ideology of research strategies. In S. Messick & J. Ross. (Eds.),Measurement in personality and cognition. New York: Wiley, 1962.Google Scholar
  67. Tomkins, S. S., & Messick, S. (Eds.).Computer simulation of personality. New York: Wiley, 1963.Google Scholar
  68. Tryon, R. C. A theory of psychological components—an alternative to “mathematical factors.”Psychological Review, 1935,42, 425–454.Google Scholar
  69. Vernon, P. E.Intelligence and cultural environment. London: Methuen, 1969.Google Scholar
  70. Wallas, G.The art of thought. New York: Harcourt, Brace, 1926.Google Scholar
  71. Wesman, A. G. Aptitude, intelligence, and achievement.Psicologia Educational, 1964,1, 42–48.Google Scholar
  72. Wesman, A. G. Intelligent testing.American Psychologist, 1968,23, 267–274.Google Scholar
  73. Whiteman, M. Intelligence and learning.Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 1964,10, 297–309.Google Scholar
  74. Witkin, H. A., Dyk, R. B., Faterson, H. F., Goodenough, D. R., & Karp, S. A.Psychological differentiation. New York: Wiley, 1962.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Psychometric Society 1972

Authors and Affiliations

  • Samuel Messick
    • 1
  1. 1.Educational Testing ServiceUSA

Personalised recommendations