, Volume 34, Issue 4, pp 407–420 | Cite as

Retrospective anticipation

  • Harry H. Harman


Public Policy Statistical Theory Retrospective Anticipation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Atkinson, R. C. A Markov model for discrimination learning.Prychometrika, 1958,23, 309–322.Google Scholar
  2. Bock, R. D. Remarks on the test of significance for the method of paired comparisons.Psychometrika, 1958,23, 323–334.Google Scholar
  3. Coombs, C. H. & Kao, R. C. On a connection between factor analysis and multidimensional unfolding.Psychometrika, 1960,25, 219–231.Google Scholar
  4. Cox, Gertrude M. The multiple factor theory in terms of common elements.Psychometrika, 1939,4, 59–68.Google Scholar
  5. Dunlap, J. W. Psychometrics—a special case of the Brahman theory.Psychometrika, 1961,26, 65–71.Google Scholar
  6. Dwyer, P. S. The evaluation of multiple and partial correlation coefficients from the factorial matrix.Psychometrika, 1940,5, 211–32.Google Scholar
  7. Estes, W. K. Theory of learning with constant, variable, or contingent probabilities of reinforcement.Psychometrika, 1957,22, 113–132.Google Scholar
  8. Green, B. F. Jr. Computer models of cognitive processes.Psychometrika, 1961,26, 85–91.Google Scholar
  9. Gulliksen, H. & Tukey, J. W. Reliability for the law of comparative judgment.Psychometrika, 1958,23, 95–110.Google Scholar
  10. Hanania, M. I. A generalization of the Bush-Mosteller model with some significance tests.Psychometrika, 1959,24, 53–68.Google Scholar
  11. Harary, F. A graph theoretic approach to similarity relations.Psychometrika, 1964,29, 143–151.Google Scholar
  12. Kaiser, Henry F. The varimax criterion for analytical rotation in factor analysis.Psychometrika, 1958,33, 187–200.Google Scholar
  13. Kraemer, Helena Chmura. Estimation in the 3-state Markov learning model.Psychometrika, 1964,29, 131–141.Google Scholar
  14. Lehman, H. C. The psychologist's most creative years.American Psychologist, 1966,21, 363–369.Google Scholar
  15. Lord, F. M. An approach to mental test theory.Psychometrika, 1959,24, 283–302.Google Scholar
  16. Luce, R. D., Macy, J. Jr. & Tagiuri, R. A statistical model for relational analysis.Psychometrika, 1955,20, 319–327.Google Scholar
  17. Lyons, J. Chronological age, professional age, and eminence in psychology.American Psychologist, 1968,23, 371–374.Google Scholar
  18. McDonald, Roderick P. A unified treatment of the weighting problem.Psychometrika, 1968,33, 351–381.Google Scholar
  19. Meredith, William. A method for studying differences between groups.Psychometrika, 1965,30, 15–29.Google Scholar
  20. Rao, C. Rodhakrishna. Estimation and tests of significance in factor analysis.Psychometrika, 1955,30, 93–111.Google Scholar
  21. Siegel, S. Theoretical models of choice and strategy behavior: Stable state behavior in the two-choice uncertain outcome situation.Psychometrika, 1959,24, 303–316.Google Scholar
  22. Simon, H. A. A comparison of game theory and learning theory.Psychometrika, 1956,21, 267–272.Google Scholar
  23. Thurstone, L. L. Psychology as a quantitative rational science.Science, 1937,85, 227–232.Google Scholar
  24. Thurstone, L. L. A method of factoring without communalities. 1954Invitational Conference on Testing Problems. Princeton, N. J.: Educ. Test. Serv., 1955, 59–62, 64–66.Google Scholar
  25. Tucker, L. R. An inter-battery method of factor analysis.Psychometrika, 1958,33, 111–136.Google Scholar
  26. Wispe, L. G. & Ritter, J. H. Where America's recognized psychologists received their Doctorates.American Psychologist, 1964,19, 634–644.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Psychometric Society 1969

Authors and Affiliations

  • Harry H. Harman
    • 1
  1. 1.Educational Testing ServiceUSA

Personalised recommendations