# Positive loadings and factor correlations from positive covariance matrices

Note And Comments

- 129 Downloads
- 3 Citations

## Abstract

In many instances it is reasonable to assume that the population covariance matrix has positive elements. This assumption implies for the single factor analysis model that the loadings and regression weights for best linear factor prediction are positive. For the multiple factor analysis model where each variable loads on a single factor and a hierarchical factor model, it implies that the loadings and the factor correlations are positive. For the latter model it also implies that the regression weights for first- and second-order factor prediction are positive.

## Key words

Classical test theory congeneric tests structural equation models hierarchical factor analysis regression weights best linear factor prediction## Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

## References

- Bekker, P.A. & Ten Berge, J.M.F. (1997). Generic global identification in factor analysis.
*Linear Algebra And Its Applications, 264*, 255–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Bock, R.D. & Liebermann, M. (1970). Fitting a response model for
*n*dichotomously scored items.*Psychometrika, 35*, 179–197.Google Scholar - Bollen, K.A. (1989).
*Structural equations with latent variables*. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar - Browne, M.W. (1984). Asymptotically distribution-free methods for the analysis of covariance structures.
*British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 37*, 62–83.PubMedGoogle Scholar - Carroll, J.B. (1993).
*Human cognitive abilities: A survey of factor analytic studies*. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar - Fisher, F.M. (1966).
*The identification problem in econometrics*. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar - Gustafsson, J.E. (1988). Hierarchical models of individual differences in cognitive abilities. In R.J. Sternberg (Ed.),
*Advances in the psychology of human intelligence*. Vol. 4 (pp. 35–71). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.Google Scholar - Henderson, H.V. & Searle, S.R. (1981). On deriving the inverse of a sum of matrices.
*SIAM Review, 23*, 53–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Jöreskog, K.G. (1971a). Statistical analysis of sets of congeneric tests.
*Psychometrika, 36*, 109–133.Google Scholar - Jöreskog, K.G. (1971b). Simultaneous factor analysis in several populations.
*Psychometrika, 36*, 409–426.Google Scholar - Kano, Y. (1986). A condition for the regression predictor to be consistent in a single common factor model.
*British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 39*, 221–227.Google Scholar - Lawley, D.N. & Maxwell, A.E. (1971).
*Factor analysis as a statistical method*(2nd ed.). London: Butterworth.Google Scholar - Lord, M. & Novick, M.R. (1968).
*Statistical theories of mental test scores*. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar - Luenberger, D.G. (1969).
*Optimization by vector space methods*. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar - Magnus, J.R. & Neudecker, H. (1988).
*Matrix differential calculus with applications in statistics and economics*. Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar - Rao, C.R. & Rao, M.B. (1998).
*Matrix algebra and its applications to statistics and econometrics*. Singapore: World Scientific.Google Scholar - Schmid, J. & Leiman, J.M. (1957). The developments of hierarchical factor solutions.
*Psychometrika, 22*, 53–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Schneeweiss, H. & Mathes, H. (1995). Factor analysis and principal components.
*Journal of Multivariate Analysis, 55*, 105–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Serfling, R.J. (1980).
*Approximation theorems of mathematical statistics*. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar - Shapiro, A. (1983). Asymptotic distribution theory in the analysis of covariance structures (A unified approach).
*South African Statistical Journal, 17*, 33–81.Google Scholar - Shapiro, A. (1985). Identifiability of factor analysis: Some results and open problems.
*Linear Algebra And Its Applications, 70*, 1–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Shapiro, A. (1988). Towards a unified theory of inequality constrained testing in multivariate analysis.
*International Statistical Review, 56*, 49–62.Google Scholar - Shapiro, A. (1989). Erratum.
*Linear Algebra And Its Applications, 125*, 149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Spearman, C. (1927).
*The abilities of man*. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar - Spearman, C. (1933). The uniqueness and exactness of g.
*British Journal Psychology, 24*, 106–108.Google Scholar - Takane, Y. & De Leeuw, J. (1987). On the relationship between item response theory and factor analysis of discretized variables.
*Psychometrika, 52*, 393–408.Google Scholar - Thurstone, L.L. (1947).
*Multiple-factor analysis: A development and expansion of the vectors of mind*. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar - Yung Y.F., Thissen, D., & Cleoid, L.D. (1999). On the relationship between the higher-order factor model and the hierarchical factor model.
*Psychometrika, 64*, 113–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

## Copyright information

© The Psychometric Society 2004