, Volume 24, Issue 2, pp 95–112 | Cite as

On methods in the analysis of profile data

  • Samuel W. Greenhouse
  • Seymour Geisser


This paper is concerned with methods for analyzing quantitative, non-categorical profile data, e.g., a battery of tests given to individuals in one or more groups. It is assumed that the variables have a multinormal distribution with an arbitrary variance-covariance matrix. Approximate procedures based on classical analysis of variance are presented, including an adjustment to the degrees of freedom resulting in conservativeF tests. These can be applied to the case where the variance-covariance matrices differ from group to group. In addition, exact generalized multivariate analysis methods are discussed. Examples are given illustrating both techniques.


Multivariate Analysis Public Policy Statistical Theory Classical Analysis Profile Data 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. [1]
    Anderson, T. W.Introduction to multivariate statistical analysis. New York: Wiley, 1958.Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    Block, J., Levine, L., and McNemar, Q. Testing for the existence of psychometric patterns.J. abnorm. soc. Psychol., 1951,46, 356–359.Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    Box, G. E. P. A general distribution theory for a class of likelihood criteria.Biometrika, 1949,36, 317–346.Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    Box, G. E. P. Problems in the analysis of growth and wear curves.Biometrics, 1950,6, 362–389.Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    Box, G. E. P. Some theorems on quadratic forms applied in the study of analysis of variance problems: I. Effect of inequality of variance in the one-way classification.Ann. math. Statist., 1954,25, 290–302.Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    Box, G. E. P. Some theorems on quadratic forms applied in the study of analysis of variance problems: II. Effects of inequality of variance and of correlation between errors in the two-way classification.Ann. math. Statist., 1954,25, 484–498.Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    Eisenhart, C. The assumptions underlying the analysis of variance.Biometrics, 1947,3, 1–21.Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    Geisser, S. and Greenhouse, S. W. An extension of Box's results on the use of theF distribution in multivariate analysis.Ann. math. Statist., 1958,29, 885–891.Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    Heck, D. L. Some uses of the distribution of the largest root in multivariate analysis. Inst. Statist. Univ. North Carolina, Mimeo. Ser. No. 194, 1958.Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    Hotelling, H. A generalizedT test and measure of multivariate dispersion.Proceedings of the second Berkeley symposium on mathematical statistics and probability. Berkeley: Univ. Calif. Press, 1951, 23–42.Google Scholar
  11. [11]
    Kullback, S. An application of information theory to multivariate analysis, II.Ann. math. Statist., 1956,27, 122–146.Google Scholar
  12. [12]
    Rao, C. R.Advanced statistical methods in biometric research. New York: Wiley, 1952.Google Scholar
  13. [13]
    Roy, S. N. On a heuristic method of test construction and its use in multivariate analysis.Ann. math. Statist., 1953,24, 220–238.Google Scholar
  14. [14]
    Scheffé, H. A “mixed model” for the analysis of variance.Ann. math. Statist., 1956,27, 23–36.Google Scholar
  15. [15]
    Welch, B. L. Note on Mrs. Aspin's Tables and on certain approximations to the tabled functions.Biometrika, 1949,36, 293–296.Google Scholar
  16. [16]
    Wilk, M. B. and Kempthorne, O. Fixed, mixed, and random models.J. Amer. statist. Ass., 1955,50, 1144–1167.Google Scholar
  17. [17]
    Wilks, S. S. Certain generalizations in the analysis of variance.Biometrika, 1932,24, 471–494.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Psychometric Society 1959

Authors and Affiliations

  • Samuel W. Greenhouse
    • 1
  • Seymour Geisser
    • 1
  1. 1.National Institute of Mental HealthUSA

Personalised recommendations