Advertisement

Psychometrika

, Volume 26, Issue 4, pp 347–372 | Cite as

The nature of the data, or how to choose a correlation coefficient

  • John B. Carroll
Article

Keywords

Public Policy Statistical Theory 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    Binder, A. Consideration of the place of assumptions in correlational analysis.Amer. Psychologist, 1959,14, 504–510.Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    Carroll, J. B. A factor analysis of verbal abilities.Psychometrika, 1941,6, 279–307.Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    Carroll, J. B. The effect of difficulty and chance success on correlations between items or between tests.Psychometrika, 1945,10, 1–19.Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    Cattell, R. B.Factor analysis. New York: Harper, 1952.Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    Cureton, E. E. Note on φ/φmax.Psychometrika, 1959,24, 89–91.Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    DeSoto, C. B. and Kuethe, J. L. On the relation between two variables.Educ. psychol. Measmt, 1960,20, 743–749.Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    Dingman, H. F. The relation between coefficients of correlation and difficulty factors.Brit. J. statist. Psychol., 1958,11, 13–17.Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    Dunlap, J. W. Psychometrics—a special case of the Brahman theory.Psychometrika, 1961,26, 65–71.Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    Ferguson, G. A. The factorial interpretation of test difficulty.Psychometrika, 1941,6, 323–329.Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    Furfey, P. H. Comment on “The needless assumption of normality in Pearson'sr.”Amer. Psychologist, 1958,13, 545–546.Google Scholar
  11. [11]
    Gage, N. L. and Damrin, D. E. Reliability, homogeneity, and number of choices.J. educ. Psychol., 1950,41, 385–404.Google Scholar
  12. [12]
    Gourlay, N. Difficulty factors arising from the use of tetrachoric correlations in factor analysis.Brit. J. statist. Psychol., 1951,4, 65–73.Google Scholar
  13. [13]
    Guilford, J. P. The difficulty of a test and its factor composition.Psychometrika, 1941,6, 67–77.Google Scholar
  14. [14]
    Guttman, L. Metricizing rank-ordered or unordered data for a linear factor analysis.Sankhyā, 1959,21, 257–268.Google Scholar
  15. [15]
    Heath, H. A. An empirical study of correlation involving a half-normal distribution.Psychol. Rep., 1961,9, 85–86.Google Scholar
  16. [16]
    John, E. and Burt, C. A reply to Mr. Gourlay's criticisms.Brit. J. statist. Psychol., 1951,4, 73–76.Google Scholar
  17. [17]
    Kruskal, W. H. Ordinal measures of association.J. Amer. statist. Ass., 1958,53, 814–861.Google Scholar
  18. [18]
    LaForge, R. Comment on “The needless assumption of normality in Pearson'sr.”Amer. Psychologist, 1958,13, 546.Google Scholar
  19. [19]
    Loevinger, J. A systematic approach to the construction and evaluation of tests of ability.Psychol. Monogr., 1947,61(4), 1–49.Google Scholar
  20. [20]
    Luce, R. D. On the possible psychophysical laws.Psychol. Rev., 1959,66, 81–95.Google Scholar
  21. [21]
    Milholland, J. E. Comment on “The needless assumption of normality in Pearson'sr.”Amer. Psychologist, 1958,13, 544–545.Google Scholar
  22. [22]
    Nefzger, M. D. and Drasgow, J. The needless assumption of normality in Pearson'sr.Amer. Psychologist, 1957,12, 623–625.Google Scholar
  23. [23]
    Norris, R. C. and Hjelm, H. F. Non-normality and product-moment correlation.J. exp. Educ., 1961,29, 261–270.Google Scholar
  24. [24]
    Schuell, H. and Jenkins, J. J. The nature of language deficit in aphasia.Psychol. Rev., 1959,66, 45–67.Google Scholar
  25. [25]
    Senders, V. L.Measurement and statistics. New York: Oxford, 1958.Google Scholar
  26. [26]
    Siegel, S.Nonparametric statistics for the behavioral sciences. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1956.Google Scholar
  27. [27]
    Stevens, S. S. Mathematics, measurement, and psychophysics. In S. S. Stevens (Ed.),Handbook of experimental psychology. New York: Wiley, 1951. Pp. 1–49.Google Scholar
  28. [28]
    Thomson, G. H.The factorial analysis of human ability. (5th ed.) Boston: Houghton-Mifflin, 1951.Google Scholar
  29. [29]
    Thurstone, L. L. Primary mental abilities.Psychometric Monogr. No.1. Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press, 1938.Google Scholar
  30. [30]
    Thurstone, L. L.Multiple-factor analysis. Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press, 1947.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Psychometric Society 1961

Authors and Affiliations

  • John B. Carroll
    • 1
  1. 1.Harvard UniversityUSA

Personalised recommendations