Psychometrika

, Volume 26, Issue 1, pp 9–25 | Cite as

Linear and multidimensional scaling

  • Harold Gulliksen
Article

Keywords

Public Policy Statistical Theory Multidimensional Scaling 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    Attneave, F. Dimensions of similarity.Amer. J. Psychol., 1950,63, 516–556.Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    Boring, E. G.A history of experimental psychology. New York: Century, 1929.Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    Bradley, R. A. and Terry, M. E. Rank analysis of incomplete block designs and the method of paired comparisons.Biometrika, 1952,39, 324–345.Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    Cliff, N. Adverbs as multipliers.Psychol. Rev., 1959,66, 27–44.Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    Coombs, C. H.A theory of psychological scaling. Engineering Res. Inst. Bull. No. 34. Ann Arbor: Univ. Michigan Press, 1952.Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    Coombs, C. H. On the use of inconsistency of preferences in psychological measurement.J. exp. Psychol., 1958,55, 1–7.Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    Coombs, C. H. An application of a non-metric model for multidimensional analysis of similarities.Psychol. Rep., 1958,4, 511–516.Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    Coombs, C. H. and Kao, R. C.Non-metric factor analysis. Engineering Res. Inst. Bull. No. 38. Ann Arbor: Univ. Michigan Press, 1955.Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    Coombs, C. H. and Pruitt, D. C. A study of decision making under risk.J. exp. Psychol., in press.Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    Davis, J. M. The transitivity of preferences.Behav. Sci., 1958,3, 26–33.Google Scholar
  11. [11]
    Dember, W. N.Psychology of perception. New York: Holt, 1960.Google Scholar
  12. [12]
    Fechner, G. T.Elemente der psychophysik. Leipzig: Breitkopf und Härtel, 1860.Google Scholar
  13. [13]
    Fechner, G. T.Vorschule der aesthetik. Leipzig: Breitkopf und Härtel, 1876.Google Scholar
  14. [14]
    Fullerton, G. S. and Cattell, J. McK.On the perception of small differences. Univ. Pennsylvania Philosophical Ser. Publ. No. 2. Philadelphia: Univ. Penn. Press, 1892.Google Scholar
  15. [15]
    Guilford, J. P.Psychometric methods. (2nd ed.) New York: McGraw-Hill, 1954.Google Scholar
  16. [16]
    Gulliksen, H. A least squares solution for successive intervals assuming unequal standard deviations.Psychometrika, 1954,19, 117–139.Google Scholar
  17. [17]
    Gulliksen, H. Measurement of subjective values.Psychometrika, 1956,21, 229–244.Google Scholar
  18. [18]
    Gulliksen, H. A least squares solution for paired comparisons with incomplete data.Psychometrika, 1956,21, 125–134.Google Scholar
  19. [19]
    Gulliksen, H. Mathematical solutions for psychological problems.Amer. Scientist, 1959,47, 178–201.Google Scholar
  20. [20]
    Gulliksen, H. Intercultural attitude comparisons. Princeton: Educ. Testing Serv. Res. Memo. 60-8, 1960.Google Scholar
  21. [21]
    Gulliksen, H. and Messick, S. (Eds.)Psychological scaling: theory and applications. New York: Wiley, 1960.Google Scholar
  22. [22]
    Gulliksen, H. and Tukey, J. Reliability for the law of comparative judgment.Psychometrika, 1958,23, 95–110.Google Scholar
  23. [23]
    Helm, C. E. A multidimensional ratio scaling analysis of perceived color relation. Princeton Univ., Psychol. Dept., 1959. (multilith)Google Scholar
  24. [24]
    Householder, A. S. and Landahl, H. D.Mathematical biophysics of the central nervous system. Bloomington, Ind.: Principia Press, 1945.Google Scholar
  25. [25]
    Klingberg, F. L. Studies in the measurement of relations between sovereign states.Psychometrika, 1941,6, 335–352.Google Scholar
  26. [26]
    Luce, R. D.Individual choice behavior. New York: Wiley, 1959.Google Scholar
  27. [27]
    Messick, S. J. The perception of social attitudes.J. abnorm. soc. Psychol., 1956,52, 57–66.Google Scholar
  28. [28]
    Messick, S. J. and Abelson, R. P. Research tools: scaling and measurement theory.Rev. educ. Res., 1957,27, 487–497.Google Scholar
  29. [29]
    Morrissey, J. H. New method for the assignment of psychometric scale values from incomplete paired comparisons.J. opt. Soc. Amer., 1955,45, 373–378.Google Scholar
  30. [30]
    Morton, A. S. Similarity as a determinant of friendship: a multidimensional study. Princeton Univ., Psychol. Dept., 1959. (multilith)Google Scholar
  31. [31]
    Mosteller, F. Remarks on the method of paired comparisons: I. The least squares solution assuming equal standard deviations and equal correlations.Psychometrika, 1951,16, 3–9.Google Scholar
  32. [32]
    Mosteller, F. Remarks on the method of paired comparisons: II. The effect of an aberrant standard deviation when equal standard deviations and equal correlations are assumed.Psychometrika, 1951,16, 203–206.Google Scholar
  33. [33]
    Mosteller, F. Remarks on the method of paired comparisons: III. A test of significance for paired comparisons when equal standard deviations and equal correlations are assumed.Psychometrika, 1951,16, 207–218.Google Scholar
  34. [34]
    Newman, E. B. The validity of the just noticeable difference as a unit of psychological magnitude.Trans. Kansas Acad. Sci., 1933,36, 172–175.Google Scholar
  35. [35]
    Osgood, C., Suci, G., and Tannenbaum, P.The measurement of meaning. Urbana: Univ. Illinois Press, 1957.Google Scholar
  36. [36]
    Richardson, M. W. Multidimensional psychophysics.Psychol. Bull., 1938,35, 659–660.Google Scholar
  37. [37]
    Runkel, P. J. Cognitive similarity in facilitating communication.Sociometry, 1956,19, 178–191.Google Scholar
  38. [38]
    Shepard, R. Stimulus and response generalization: Tests of a model relating generalization to distance in psychological space.J. exp. Psychol., 1958,55, 509–523.Google Scholar
  39. [39]
    Stevens, S. S. On the psychophysical law.Psychol. Rev., 1957,64, 153–181.Google Scholar
  40. [40]
    Thorndike, E. L. Handwriting.Teachers Coll. Rec., 1910,11, No. 2, 1–93.Google Scholar
  41. [41]
    Thurstone, L. L. A law of comparative judgment.Psychol. Rev., 1927,34, 273–286.Google Scholar
  42. [42]
    Thurstone, L. L.The measurement of values. Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press, 1959.Google Scholar
  43. [43]
    Titchener, E. B.Experimental psychology. Vol. 1. New York: Macmillan, 1901.Google Scholar
  44. [44]
    Torgerson, W. S.Theory and methods of scaling. New York: Wiley, 1958.Google Scholar
  45. [45]
    Tucker, L. R. Dimensions of preference. Princeton: Educ. Testing Serv. Res. Memo. 60–7, 1960.Google Scholar
  46. [46]
    Young, G. and Householder, A. S. A discussion of a set of points in terms of their mutual distances.Psychometrika, 1938,3, 19–22.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Psychometric Society 1961

Authors and Affiliations

  • Harold Gulliksen
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Princeton UniversityUSA
  2. 2.Educational Testing ServiceUSA

Personalised recommendations