Psychometrika

, Volume 33, Issue 1, pp 37–71 | Cite as

A monte carlo approach to the number of factors problem

  • Robert L. Linn
Article

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bargmann, R. E.A study of independence and dependence in multivariate normal analysis. University of North Carolina, Inst. Statist., Mimeograph Series No. 186, 1957.Google Scholar
  2. Bartlett, M. S. Tests of significance in factor analysis.British Journal of Psychology, (Statistical Section), 1950,3, 77–85.Google Scholar
  3. Bartlett, M. S. A note on the multiplying factors for various approximations.Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 1954,16, 296–298.Google Scholar
  4. Browne, M. W. A comparison by artificial experiment of methods of estimation in factor analysis.Psychometrika (in press).Google Scholar
  5. Burt, C. L. Tests of significance in factor analysis.British Journal of Psychology, (Statistical Section), 1952,5, 109–133.Google Scholar
  6. Cattell, R. B. The basis of recognition and interpretation of factors,Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1962,22, 667–697.Google Scholar
  7. Guilford, J. P., & Lacey, J. I.Printed classification tests, Vol. 5, Aviation Psychology Program Research Reports, U. S. Govt. Printing Office, 1947.Google Scholar
  8. Guttman, L. Some necessary conditions for common factor analysis.Psychometrika, 1954,19, 149–161.Google Scholar
  9. Harman, H. H.Modern factor analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1960.Google Scholar
  10. Harris, C. W. Some Rao-Guttman relationships.Psychometrika, 1962,27, 247–263.Google Scholar
  11. Harris, C. W. Some recent developments in factor analysis.Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1964,24, 193–206.Google Scholar
  12. Horn, J. L. A rationale and test for the number of factors in factor analysis.Psychometrika, 1965,30, 179–186.Google Scholar
  13. Humphreys, L. G. Number of cases and number of factors: An example whereN is very large.Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1964,24, 457–466.Google Scholar
  14. Kaiser, H. F. Comments on communalities and the number of factors. Paper read at a conference, The Communality Problem in Factor Analysis, Washington University, St. Louis, 1960, under the sponsorship of Philip H. Du Bois.Google Scholar
  15. Kaiser, H. F. A note on Guttman's lower bound for the number of common factors.British Journal of Statistical Psychology, 1961,14, 1–2.Google Scholar
  16. Lawley, D. N. The estimation of factor loadings by the method of maximum likelihood.Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh, 1940,60, 64–82.Google Scholar
  17. Lawley, D. N. The application of the maximum likelihood method to factor analysis.British Journal of Psychology, 1943,33, 172–175.Google Scholar
  18. Lawley, D. N., & Maxwell, A. E.Factor analysis as a statistical method. London: Butterworths, 1963.Google Scholar
  19. Linn, R. L. Use of random normal deviates to determine the number of factors to extract in factor analysis. Unpublished Master's Thesis, University of Illinois, Urbana, Illinois, 1964.Google Scholar
  20. McNemar, Q. On the sampling errors of factor loadings.Psychometrika, 1941,4, 141–152.Google Scholar
  21. McNemar, Q. On the number of factors.Psychometrika, 1942,7, 9–18.Google Scholar
  22. McNemar, Q. The factors in factoring behavior.Psychometrika, 1951,16, 353–359.Google Scholar
  23. Odell, P. L., and Feiveson, A. H. A numerical procedure to generate a sample covariance matrix.Journal of the American Statistical Association, 1966,61, 199–203.Google Scholar
  24. Rao, C. R. Estimation and tests of significance in factor analysis.Psychometrika, 1955,20, 93–111.Google Scholar
  25. Thomson, G. H.The factorial analysis of human ability. (5th ed.) Boston: Mifflin Co., 1951. Pp. 307–328.Google Scholar
  26. Thurstone, L. L., and Thurstone, Thelma G. Factorial studies of intelligence.Psychometric Monograph No. 2, 1941.Google Scholar
  27. Tucker, L. R, Koopman, R. F., and Linn, R. L. Evaluation of factor analytic research procedures by means of simulated correlation matrices. Project on Techniques for Investigation of Structure of Individual Differences in Psychological Phenomena. Univ. of Illinois. 1967.Google Scholar
  28. Vernon, P. E. Psychological tests in the Royal Navy, Army and A.T.S.Occupational Psychology, 1947,21, 53–74.Google Scholar
  29. Wilson, E. B., and Worcester, Jane. Note on factor analysis.Psychometrika, 1939,4, 133–148.Google Scholar
  30. Wishart, J. The generalized product moment distribution in samples from a normal multivariate population.Biometrika, 1928,20, 32–52.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Psychometric Society 1968

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robert L. Linn
    • 1
  1. 1.Educational Testing ServiceUSA

Personalised recommendations