, Volume 33, Issue 1, pp 19–33 | Cite as

On two-sided orthogonal procrustes problems

  • Peter H. Schönemann


A least squares method for approximating a given symmetric matrixB by another matrixB which is orthogonally similar to a second given matrixA is derived and then generalized to nonsymmetric (but square)A andB. A possible application to ordering problems is discussed.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Bellman, R.Introduction to matrix analysis. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1960.Google Scholar
  2. Cattell, R. B.Factor analysis. An introduction and manual for the psychologists and social Scientists. New York: Harper & Bros., 1952.Google Scholar
  3. Combs, C. H.A theory of data. New York: Wiley, 1964.Google Scholar
  4. Dwyer, P. S. and MacPhail, M. S. Symbolic matrix derivatives.Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 1948,19, 517–534.Google Scholar
  5. Eckart, C. and Young, G. The approximation of one matrix by another of lower rank.Psychometrika, 1936,1, 211–218.Google Scholar
  6. Foa, U. G. The structure of interpersonal behavior in the dyad. In Criswell, Solomon and Suppes (Eds.),Mathematical methods in small group processes. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1962.Google Scholar
  7. Green, B. F. The orthogonal approximation of an oblique structure in factor analysis.Psychometrika, 1952,17, 429–440.Google Scholar
  8. Greenberg, M. G. A method of successive cumulations for the scaling of pair comparison preference judgments.Psychometrika, 1965,30, 441–448.Google Scholar
  9. Guttman, L. A new approach to factor analysis: The Radex. in P. F. Lazarsfeld (Ed.),Mathematical thinking in the social sciences. Glencoe, Illinois: Free Press, 1954.Google Scholar
  10. Hardy, G. H., Littlewood, T. E. and Polya, A. Inequalities. Cambridge, University Press, 1959.Google Scholar
  11. Householder, A. S. and Young, A. Matrix approximation and latent roots.American Mathematical Monthly, 1938,45, 165–171.Google Scholar
  12. Hurley, J. R. and Cattell, R. B. Producing direct rotation to test a hypothesized factor structure.Behavioral Science, 1962,7, 258–262.Google Scholar
  13. Kaiser, H. F. Scaling a simplex.Psychometrika, 1962,27, 155–162.Google Scholar
  14. Kruskal, J. B. Multidimensional scaling by optimizing goodness of fit to a nonmetric hypothesis.Psychometrika, 1964,29, 1–27.Google Scholar
  15. Mukherjee, B. N. Derivation of likelihood-ratio tests for Guttman quasi-simplex covariance structures.Psychometria, 1966,31, 97–123.Google Scholar
  16. Schönemann, P. H. A generalized solution of the orthogonal Procrustes problem.Psychometrika, 1966,31, 1–10.Google Scholar
  17. Schönemann, P. H. On the formal matrix differentiation of traces and determinants. Research Memorandum No. 27, Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Psychometric Laboratory, 1965.Google Scholar
  18. Schönemann, P. H., Bock, R. D. and Tucker, L. R. Some notes on a theorem by Eckart and Young. Research Memorandum No. 25, Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Psychometric Laboratory, 1965.Google Scholar
  19. Shepard, R. N. The analysis of proximities: Multidimensional scaling with an unknown distance function.Psychometrika, 1962,27, 125–139, 219–246.Google Scholar
  20. Tryon, R. C. Identification of social areas by cluster analysis.University of California Publications in Psychology, 1955,8, No. 5.Google Scholar
  21. Tucker, L. R. A method for synthesis of factor analysis studies. A. G. O. Personnel Research. Section. Rep. No. 984, Department of the Army, 1951.Google Scholar
  22. Wrobleski, W. J. Extension of the Dwyer-MacPhail matrix derivative calculus with applications to estimation problems involving errors-in-variables and errors-in-equations. Technical Report, The University of Michigan, 1963.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Psychometric Society 1968

Authors and Affiliations

  • Peter H. Schönemann
    • 1
  1. 1.Ohio State UniversityUSA

Personalised recommendations