Psychometrika

, Volume 29, Issue 1, pp 1–27

Multidimensional scaling by optimizing goodness of fit to a nonmetric hypothesis

  • J. B. Kruskal
Article

Abstract

Multidimensional scaling is the problem of representingn objects geometrically byn points, so that the interpoint distances correspond in some sense to experimental dissimilarities between objects. In just what sense distances and dissimilarities should correspond has been left rather vague in most approaches, thus leaving these approaches logically incomplete. Our fundamental hypothesis is that dissimilarities and distances are monotonically related. We define a quantitative, intuitively satisfying measure of goodness of fit to this hypothesis. Our technique of multidimensional scaling is to compute that configuration of points which optimizes the goodness of fit. A practical computer program for doing the calculations is described in a companion paper.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    Abelson, R. P. and Tukey, J. W. Efficient conversion of nonmetric information into metric information.Proc. Amer. statist. Ass. Meetings, Social statist. Section, 1959, 226–230.Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    Aumann, R. J. and Kruskal, J. B. The coefficients in an allocation problem.Naval Res. Logistics Quart., 1958,5, 111–123.Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    Aumann, R. J. and Kruskal, J. B. Assigning quantitative values to qualitative factors in the Naval electronics problem.Naval Res. Logistics Quart., 1959,6, 1–16.Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    Bartholomew, D. J. A test of homogeneity for ordered alternatives.Biometrika, 1959,46, 36–48.Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    Coombs, C. H. An application of a nonmetric model for multidimensional analysis of similarities.Psychol. Rep., 1958,4, 511–518.Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    Coombs, C. H. and Kao, R. C. On a connection between factor analysis and multidimensional unfolding.Psychometrika, 1960,25, 219–231.Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    Ekman, G. Dimensions of color vision.J. Psychol., 1954,38, 467–474.Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    Hardy, G. H., Littlewood, J. E., and Polya, G.Inequalities. (2nd ed.) Cambridge, Eng.: Cambridge Univ. Press, 1952.Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    Indow, T. and Uchizono, T. Multidimensional mapping of Munsell colors varying in hue and chroma.J. exp. Psychol., 1960,59, 321–329.Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    Indow, T. and Kanazawa, K. Multidimensional mapping of colors varying in hue, chroma and value.J. exp. Psychol., 1960,59, 330–336.Google Scholar
  11. [11]
    Kolmogorov, A. N. and Fomin, S. V.Elements of the theory of functions and functional analysis. Vol. 1.Metric and normed spaces. Translated from the first (1954) Russian edition by Leo F. Boron. Rochester, N. Y.: Graylock Press, 1957.Google Scholar
  12. [12]
    Kruskal, J. B. Nonmetric multidimensional scaling: A numerical method.Psychometrika, (accepted for publication, June, 1964).Google Scholar
  13. [13]
    Rothkopf, E. Z. A measure of stimulus similarity and errors in some paired-associate learning tasks.J. exp. Psychol., 1957,53, 94–101.Google Scholar
  14. [14]
    Shepard, R. N. Stimulus and response generalization: A stochastic model relating generalization to distance in psychological space.Psychometrika, 1957,32, 325–345.Google Scholar
  15. [15]
    Shepard, R. N. The analysis of proximities: Multidimensional scaling with an unknown distance function.Psychometrika, 1962,27, 125–139, 219–246.Google Scholar
  16. [16]
    Shepard, R. N. Analysis of proximities as a technique for the study of information processing in man.Human Factors, 1963,5, 19–34.Google Scholar
  17. [17]
    Torgerson, W. S.Theory and methods of scaling. New York: Wiley, 1958.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Psychometric Society 1964

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. B. Kruskal
    • 1
  1. 1.Bell Telephone LaboratoriesMurray Hill

Personalised recommendations