, Volume 28, Issue 4, pp 333–367 | Cite as

An individual differences model for multidimensional scaling

  • Ledyard R Tucker
  • Samuel Messick


A quantitative system is presented to permit the determination of separate multidimensional perceptual spaces for individuals having different viewpoints about stimulus interrelationships. The structure of individual differences in the perception of stimulus relationships is also determined to provide a framework for ascertaining the varieties of consistent individual viewpoints and their relationships with other variables.


Individual Difference Public Policy Statistical Theory Multidimensional Scaling Difference Model 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. [1]
    Abelson, R. P. A technique and a model for multidimensional attitude scaling.Publ. opin. Quart., 1954–1955,18, 405–418.Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    Abelson, R. P. and Sermat, V. Multidimensional scaling of facial expressions.J. exp. Psychol., 1962,63, 546–554.Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    Adams, E. and Messick, S. An axiomatic formulation and generalization of successive intervals scaling.Psychometrika, 1958,23, 355–368.Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    Attneave, F. Dimensions of similarity.Amer. J. Psychol., 1950,63, 516–556.Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    Bieri, J. and Blacker, E. The generality of cognitive complexity in the perception of people and inkblots.J. abnorm. soc. Psychol., 1956,53, 112–117.Google Scholar
  6. [5a]
    Bock, R. D. The selection of judges for preference testing.Psychometrika, 1956,21, 349–366.Google Scholar
  7. [6]
    Cliff, N. Analytic rotation to a functional relationship.Psychometrika, 1962,27, 283–295.Google Scholar
  8. [7]
    Coombs, C. H. An application of a nonmetric model for multidimensional analysis of similarities.Psychol. Rep., 1958,4, 511–518.Google Scholar
  9. [8]
    Diederich, G. W., Messick, S., and Tucker, L. R. A general least squares solution for successive intervals.Psychometrika, 1957,22, 159–173.Google Scholar
  10. [9]
    Eckart, C. and Young, G. The approximation of one matrix by another of lower rank.Psychometrika, 1936,1, 211–218.Google Scholar
  11. [10]
    Ekman, G. Dimensions of color vision.J. Psychol., 1954,38, 467–474.Google Scholar
  12. [11]
    Gulliksen, H. Linear and multidimensional scaling.Psychometrika, 1961,26, 9–25.Google Scholar
  13. [12]
    Gulliksen, H. The structure of individual differences in optimality judgments. In G. Bryan and M. Shelly (Eds.),Human judgments and optimality. New York: Wiley, 1963 (in press).Google Scholar
  14. [13]
    Harman, H. H.Modern factor analysis. Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press, 1960.Google Scholar
  15. [14]
    Harvey, O. J., Hunt, D. E., and Schroder, H. M.Conceptual systems and personality organization. New York: Wiley, 1961.Google Scholar
  16. [15]
    Helm, C. A multidimensional ratio scaling analysis of perceived color relations. Princeton, N. J.: ONR Technical Report, Educational Testing Service, 1959.Google Scholar
  17. [16]
    Helm, C. and Tucker, L. R. Individual differences in the structure of color perception.Amer. J. Psychol., 1962,75, 437–444.Google Scholar
  18. [16a]
    Holzinger, K. J. Factoring test scores and implications for the method of averages.Psychometrika, 1944,9, 155–167.Google Scholar
  19. [17]
    Horst, P.Matrix algebra for social scientists. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, 1963.Google Scholar
  20. [18]
    Hotelling, H. Analysis of a complex of statistical variables into principal components.J. educ. Psychol., 1933,24, 417–441, 498–520.Google Scholar
  21. [19]
    Indow, T. and Kanazawa, K. Multidimensional mapping of Munsell colors varying in hue, chroma, and value.J. exp. Psychol., 1960,59, 330–336.Google Scholar
  22. [20]
    Indow, T. and Uchizono, T. Multidimensional mapping of Munsell colors varying in hue and chroma.J. exp. Psychol., 1960,59, 321–329.Google Scholar
  23. [21]
    Jackson, D. N. and Messick, S. Individual differences in social perception.Brit. J. soc. clin. Psychol., 1963 (in press).Google Scholar
  24. [22]
    Jackson, D. N., Messick, S., and Solley, C. M. A multidimensional scaling approach to the perception of personality.J. Psychol., 1957,44, 311–318.Google Scholar
  25. [23]
    Klingberg, F. L. Studies in measurement of the relations between sovereign states.Psychometrika, 1941,6, 335–352.Google Scholar
  26. [24]
    Messick, S. The perception of social attitudes.J. abnorm. soc. Psychol., 1956,52, 57–66.Google Scholar
  27. [25]
    Messick, S. Some recent theoretical developments in multidimensional scaling.Educ. psychol. Measmt, 1956,16, 82–100.Google Scholar
  28. [26]
    Messick, S. An empirical evaluation of multidimensional successive intervals.Psychometrika, 1956,21, 367–375.Google Scholar
  29. [27]
    Messick, S. Dimensions of social desirability.J. consult. Psychol., 1960,24, 279–287.Google Scholar
  30. [28]
    Messick, S. The perceived structure of political relationships.Sociometry, 1961,24, 270–278.Google Scholar
  31. [29]
    Messick, S. and Abelson, R. P. The additive constant problem in multidimensional scaling.Psychometrika, 1956,21, 1–15.Google Scholar
  32. [30]
    Messick, S. and Kogan, N. Differentiation and compartmentalization in objectsorting measures of categorizing style.Percept. mot. Skills, 1963,16, 47–51.Google Scholar
  33. [31]
    Morris, C. and Jones, L. V. Value scales and dimensions.J. abnorm. soc. Psychol., 1955,51, 523–535.Google Scholar
  34. [32]
    Morton, A. S. Similarity as a determinant of friendship: A multidimensional study. Princeton, N. J.: ONR Technical Report, Educational Testing Service, 1959.Google Scholar
  35. [33]
    Mosier, C. I. Determining a simple structure when loadings for certain tests are known.Psychometrika, 1939,4, 149–162.Google Scholar
  36. [34]
    Nunnally, J. The analysis of profile data.Psychol. Bull., 1962,59, 311–319.Google Scholar
  37. [35]
    Reeb, M. How people see jobs: A multidimensional analysis.Occupational Psychol., 1959,33, 1–17.Google Scholar
  38. [36]
    Richardson, M. W. Multidimensional psychophysics.Psychol. Bull., 1938,35, 659–660 (Abstract).Google Scholar
  39. [37]
    Scott, W. A. Cognitive complexity and cognitive flexibility.Sociometry, 1962,25, 405–414.Google Scholar
  40. [38]
    Shepard, R. N. Stimulus and response generalization: Tests of a model relating generalization to distance in psychological space.J. exp. Psychol., 1958,55, 509–523.Google Scholar
  41. [39]
    Shepard, R. N. Similarity of stimuli and metric properties of behavioral data. In H. Gulliksen and S. Messick (Eds.),Psychological scaling: Theory and applications. New York: Wiley, 1960, Pp. 33–43.Google Scholar
  42. [40]
    Shepard, R. N. The analysis of proximities: Multidimensional scaling with an unknown distance function: I.Psychometrika, 1962,27, 125–140.Google Scholar
  43. [41]
    Shepard, R. N. The analysis of proximities: Multidimensional scaling with an unknown distance function: II.Psychometrika, 1962,27, 219–246.Google Scholar
  44. [41a]
    Slater, P. The analysis of personal preferences.Brit. J. statist. Psychol., 1960,13, 119–135.Google Scholar
  45. [42]
    Sloane, H., Gorlow, L., and Jackson, D. N. Cognitive styles in equivalence range.Percept. mot. Skills, 1963,16, 389–404.Google Scholar
  46. [43]
    Torgerson, W. S. A theoretical and empirical investigation of multidimensional scaling. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Princeton Univ., 1951.Google Scholar
  47. [44]
    Torgerson, W. S. Multidimensional scaling: I. Theory and method.Psychometrika, 1952,17, 401–419.Google Scholar
  48. [45]
    Torgerson, W. S.Theory and methods of scaling. New York: Wiley, 1958.Google Scholar
  49. [46]
    Tucker, L. R. Description of paired comparison preference judgments by a multi-dimensional vector model. Princeton, N. J.: Educational Testing Service, Res. Memo. 55–7, 1955.Google Scholar
  50. [47]
    Tucker, L R. Intra-individual and inter-individual multidimensionality. In H. Gulliksen and S. Messick (Eds.),Psychological scaling: Theory and applications. New York: Wiley, 1960. Pp. 155–167.Google Scholar
  51. [48]
    Tucker, L R. Systematic differences between individuals in perceptual judgments. In G. Bryan and M. Shelly (Eds.),Human judgments and optimality. New York: Wiley, 1963 (in press).Google Scholar
  52. [49]
    Young, G. and Householder, A. S. Discussion of a set of points in terms of their mutual distances.Psychometrika, 1938,3, 19–22.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Psychometric Society 1963

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ledyard R Tucker
    • 1
  • Samuel Messick
    • 2
  1. 1.University of IllinoisUSA
  2. 2.Educational Testing ServiceUSA

Personalised recommendations