, Volume 31, Issue 1, pp 1–10 | Cite as

A generalized solution of the orthogonal procrustes problem

  • Peter H. Schönemann


A solutionT of the least-squares problemAT=B +E, givenA andB so that trace (E′E)= minimum andT′T=I is presented. It is compared with a less general solution of the same problem which was given by Green [5]. The present solution, in contrast to Green's, is applicable to matricesA andB which are of less than full column rank. Some technical suggestions for the numerical computation ofT and an illustrative example are given.


Numerical Computation Public Policy General Solution Statistical Theory Present Solution 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. [1]
    Bellman, R.Introduction to matrix analysis. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1960.Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    Dwyer, P. S. and McPhail, M. S. Symbolic matrix derivatives.Ann. math. Statist., 1948,19, 517–534.Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    Eckart, C. and Young, G. The approximation of one matrix by another of lower rank.Psychometrika, 1936,1, 211–218.Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    Gibson, W. A. On the least-squares orthogonalization of an oblique transformation.Psychometrika, 1962,27, 193–196.Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    Green, B. F. The orthogonal approximation of an oblique structure in factor analysis.Psychometrika, 1952,17, 429–440.Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    HOW. FORTRAN Subroutine, using non-iterative methods of Householder, Ortega, and Wilkinson, solves for eigenvalues and corresponding eigenvectors of a real symmetric matrix. Program writeup F2 BC HOW. Berkeley Division, Univ. Calif., 1962.Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    Hunter, J. Personal communication, 1964.Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    Hurley, J. R. and Cattell, R. B. Producing direct rotation to test a hypothesized factor structure.Behav. Sci., 1962,7, 258–262.Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    Johnson, R. M. On a theorem by Eckart and Young.Psychometrika, 1963,28, 259–263.Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    Johnson, R. M. The minimal transformation to orthonormality. Paper read at the joint meeting of the Psychonomic Society and the Psychometric Society, Niagara Falls, Ontario, Canada, 1964.Google Scholar
  11. [11]
    Mosier, C. I. Determining a simple structure when loadings for certain tests are known.Psychometrika, 1939,4, 149–162.Google Scholar
  12. [12]
    Schmid, J. and Leiman, J. M. The development of hierarchical factor solutions.Psychometrika, 1957,22, 53–61.Google Scholar
  13. [13]
    Schönemann, P. H., Bock, R. D., and Tucker, L. R. Some notes on a theorem by Eckart and Young. Univ. of North Carolina Psychometric Laboratory Research Memorandum No. 25, 1965.Google Scholar
  14. [14]
    Thurstone, L. L.Multiple-factor analysis. Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press, 1947.Google Scholar
  15. [15]
    Tucker, L. R. Personal communication, 1964.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Psychometric Society 1966

Authors and Affiliations

  • Peter H. Schönemann
    • 1
  1. 1.Psychometric LaboratoryUniversity of North CarolinaUSA

Personalised recommendations