Advertisement

Predicting closure of private substance abuse treatment facilities

  • J. Aaron JohnsonEmail author
  • Paul M. Roman
Special Section

Abstract

Researchers in organizational ecology have long been interested in identifying the factors associated with organizations closing their doors. Though the predictors of closure have been examined across many different types of organizations, private substance abuse treatment centers, often characterized as unstable and having high closure rates, have not been subject to empirical study. Data for this study were derived from a nationally representative longitudinal study of 450 private substance abuse treatment centers. Contrary to most previous research, center age was not a significant predictor of closure. Significant predictors included center capacity, being a freestanding facility, the percentage of clients covered by Medicaid, and the ratio of patients to full-time equivalents.

Keywords

Longitudinal Study Substance Abuse Empirical Study Health Promotion Health Psychology 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Hannan MT, Freeman J.Organizational Ecology. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger; 1989.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Carroll G, Hannan MT.The Demography of Corporations and Industries. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press; 2000.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Alexander JA, D'Aunno TA, Succi MJ. Determinants of profound organizational change: choice of conversion or closure among rural hospitals.Journal of Health and Social Behavior. 1996;37:238–251.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Succi MJ, Lee SY, Alexander JA. Effects of market position and competition on rural hospital closures.Health Services Research. 1997;31(6):679–699.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lynch JR, Ozcan YA. Hospital closure: an efficiency analysis.Hospital and Health Services Administration. 1994;39:205–220.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    McKay NL, Coventry JA. Rural hospital closures: determinants of conversion to an alternative health care facility.Medical Care. 1993;31:130–140.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Mayer JD, Kohlenberg ER, Sieferman GE, et al. Patterns of rural hospital closure in the United States.Social Science and Medicine. 1987;24:327–334.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Blum TC, Shane S, Roman PM. Organizational survival: the private alcoholism treatment center. In: Reynolds P, McDougall PP, Birley S, et al, eds.Frontiers of Entrepreneurial Research. Boston: Babson College Center for Entrepreneurship; 1997.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration.Uniform Facility Data Set (UFDS): Data for 1996 and 1980–1996. Rockville, MD: SAMHSA; 1998. DHHS publication (SMA) 98-3176.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Mee-Lee D, Gartner L, Miller LL, et al.Patient Placement Criteria for the Treatment of Substance-Related Disorders. 2nd ed. Chevy Chase, MD: American Society of Addiction Medicine; 1996.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Drug, Alcohol, and Other Addictions: A Directory of Treatment Centers and Prevention Programs Nationwide. 2nd ed. Phoenix, AZ: The Oryx Press; 1993.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Allison PD.Event History Analysis: Regression for Longitudinal Event Data. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage; 1984.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Carroll GR, Hannan MT.The Demography of Corporations and Industries. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press; 2000.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Association of Behavioral Healthcare Management, NCCBH 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute for Behavioral ResearchThe University of GeorgiaAthens
  2. 2.Institute for Behavioral Research and Department of SociologyUSA

Personalised recommendations