The Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research

, Volume 25, Issue 1, pp 100–107

Developing an integrated information system for specialized addiction treatment agencies

Brief Reports


This article outlines the development of an integrated information system for specialized alcohol and drug treatment agencies in Ontario, Canada. The system is being developed following a strategic planning process involving provincial funding ministries and coalitions of service providers. An overview of the system's development is provided and the implementation of one subcomponent, a client-tracking system, is described. Some challenges to the implementation of this component are identified.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Miller WR, Brown JM, Simpson TL, Handmaker NS, et al.: What works? A methodological analysis of the alcohol treatment outcome literature. In: Hester RK, Miller WR (Eds.):Handbook of Alcoholism Treatment Approaches. Boston: Allyn & Bacon, 1995, pp. 12–45.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    McLellan AT, O'Brien CP, Metzger D, et al.: How effective is substance abuse treatment: Compared to what? In: O'Brien C, Jaffe JH (Eds.):Addictive States. New York: Raven Press, 1992, pp. 231–252.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hubbard RL, Marsden ME, Rachal JV, et al.:Drug Abuse Treatment: A National Study of Effectiveness. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1989.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Holder H, Longabaugh R, Miller W, et al.: The cost effectiveness of treatment for alcoholism: A first approximation.Journal of Studies on Alcohol 1991; 52:517–525.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Tims FM, Fletcher BW, Hubbard RL: Treatment outcomes for drug abuse clients. In: Pickens RW, Leukefeld CG, Schuster CR (Eds.):Improving Drug Abuse Treatment. DHSS Pub. No. (ADM) 91-1754. Washington, DC: National Institute on Drug Abuse, 1991, pp. 93–113.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Panepinto WC, Simmons L: Treating the illness, not the mandate: Techniques for successful referral, engagement, and treatment of alcoholic persons.Alcoholic Treatment Quarterly 1986; 3(3):37–48.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Williams C, Lewis D, Femino J, et al.: Overcoming barriers to identification and referral of alcoholics in a general hospital setting: One approach.Rhode Island Medical Journal 1985; 68:131–138.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hester RK, Miller WR: Empirical guidelines for optimal client-treatment matching. In: National Institute on Drug Abuse (Ed.):Adolescent Drug Abuse: Analyses of Treatment Research. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 1988, pp. 17–38.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Institute of Medicine, National Academy of Sciences:Broadening the Base of Alcohol Treatment. Washington, DC: National Academy of Science Press, 1990.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Friedman AS, Granick S, Kreisher C, et al.: Matching adolescents who abuse drugs to treatment.American Journal on Addictions 1993; 2:232–236.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ogborne AC, Rush BR: Specialized addiction assessment/referral services in Ontario: A review of their characteristics and roles in the addiction treatment system.British Journal of Addiction 1990; 85(2):197–204.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ridgley MS, Goldman HH, Willenbring M: Barriers to the care of persons with dual diagnosis: Organization and financial issues.Schizophrenia Bulletin 1990; 16:123–132.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ellis K, Rush BR:Alcohol and Other Drug Services in Ontario: Results of a Provincial Survey, 1992. Toronto: Addiction Research Foundation, 1993.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ontario Ministry of Health:Partners in Action: Ontario's Substance Abuse Strategy. Toronto: Queen's Printer for Ontario, 1993.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Harrison PA, Beebe TJ, Fulkerson JA, et al.: The development of patient profiles for Minnesota's treatment outcomes monitoring system.Addiction 1996; 91:687–699.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Rush BR, Vincent S, Chevendra V: An overview of the Drug and Alcohol Registry of Treatment. In: Duplessis G, McCrae M, Viscaff C, Doupe S (Eds.):What Works! Innovation in Community Mental Health and Addiction Treatment Programs. Toronto: Canadian Scholars Press, 1993, pp. 271–282.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Camp J, Krakow M, McCarty D, et al.: Substance abuse treatment management information systems: Balancing federal, state and service provider needs.Journal of Mental Health Administration 1992; 19:5–19.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Caputo RK: The implications of information systems for the distribution of authority and decision making in human service organizations.Computers in Human Services 1989; 4:221–231.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Association of Behavioral Healthcare Management 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Clinical, Social and Evaluation and Research Department, Addiction Research FoundationLondonCanada

Personalised recommendations