Oklahoma city: Disaster challenges mental health and medical administrators

  • Phebe Tucker
  • Betty Pfefferbaum
  • Robert Vincent
  • Sharron D. Boehler
  • Sara Jo Nixon
Brief Reports


Mental health and medical administrators responded to the Oklahoma City bombing with cooperative and overlapping efforts to meet community needs in the wake of terrorism. The major agencies assisted in the immediate rescue response, organized crisis hotlines, prepared mental health professionals to counsel bereaved families and victims, organized debriefing of rescuers, assessed mental health needs of local school children, planned for longer term treatment, and coordinated research efforts to learn from the disaster. Implications to mental health administrators responding to significant acts of terrorism are discussed.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Holloway HC, Norwood AE, Fullerton CS, et al.: The threat of biological weapons: Prophylaxis and mitigation of psychological and social consequences.Journal of the American Medical Association 1997; 278:425–427.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Krug RS, Nixon SJ, Vincent R: Psychological response to the Oklahoma City bombing [editorial].Journal of Clinical Psychology 1996; 52:103–105.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    McCloy E: Management of post-incident trauma: A fire service perspective.Occupational Medicine 1992; 42:163–166.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bradford R, John AM: The psychological effects of disaster work: Implications for disaster planning.Journal of the Royal Society of Health 1991; 111:107–110.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Alexander DA: Psychological intervention for victims and helpers after disasters [review].British Journal of General Practice 1990; 40:345–348.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Burns C, Harm NJ: Emergency nurses' perceptions of critical incidents and stress debriefing.Journal of Emergency Nursing 1993; 19:431–436.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    G-7 [Group of Seven industrialized nations—United States, Japan, Germany, Britain, France, Italy, and Canada]:Declaration on Terrorism. G-7 Economic Summit, Lyon, France, June 27, 1996.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Simon JD: Biological terrorism: Preparing to meet the threat.Journal of the American Medical Association 1997; 278:428–430.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Van der Ploeg HM, Kleijn WC: Being held hostage in the Netherlands: A study of long-term aftereffects.Journal of Traumatic Stress 1989; 2:153–169.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Dreman S, Cohen E: Children of victims of terrorism revisited: Integrating individual and family treatment approaches.American Journal of Orthopsychiatry 1990; 60:204–209.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Miller KE: The effects of state terrorism and exile on indigenous Guatemalan refugee children: A mental health assessment and an analysis of children's narratives.Child Development 1996; 67:89–106.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Curran PS: Psychiatric aspects of terrorist violence: Northern Ireland 1969–1987.British Journal of Psychiatry 1988; 153:470–475.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Dunagan P:After Action Report: Oklahoma City Bombing. Unpublished manuscript, City/County Health Department, 1995.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Pfefferbaum B, Moore, VL: Effects of Disaster on School Children. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychiatric Association, New York, May 1996.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Association of Behavioral Healthcare Management 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • Phebe Tucker
    • 1
  • Betty Pfefferbaum
    • 1
  • Robert Vincent
    • 2
    • 3
  • Sharron D. Boehler
    • 4
  • Sara Jo Nixon
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral SciencesUniversity of Oklahoma Health Services Center, WP 3440Oklahoma City
  2. 2.the Oklahoma State Department of HealthOklahoma City
  3. 3.the Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral SciencesOklahoma City
  4. 4.the Oklahoma Department of Mental Health and Substance Abuse ServicesOklahoma City

Personalised recommendations