Benefit limits in managed behavioral health care: Do they matter?

Abstract

More than half of Americans with insurance coverage for mental health services are enrolled in plans that carve out behavioral health care services with a vendor specializing in the management of these services. However, utilization management has not taken the place of benefit limitations. Do benefit limits matter? This article reports the percentage of enrollees in managed behavioral health care carve-out plans that encounter benefit limits. Estimates are provided on the impact and savings of imposing benefit limits on enrollees in unrestricted plans. Costs to eliminate benefit limits are estimated to be very small. This study finds that benefit limits do matter but only to a very small number of plan enrollees. Furthermore, the results of this study show that for inpatient limits, children are especially vulnerable. These issues have important implications for discussions about the impact of managed care in mental health and for discussions concerning parity legislation.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Sturm R: How expensive is unlimited mental health care coverage under managed care?Journal of the American Medical Association 1997; 12:1533–1537Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Frank RG, Lave JR: Economics of managed mental health. In: Feldman S (Ed):Managed Mental Health Services. Springfield, IL: Charles C Thomas, 1992, pp. 83–99.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Sturm R, McCulloch J: Mental health substance abuse benefits in carve-out plans and the mental health parity act of 1996.Journal of Health Care Financing 1998; 24(3):82–92.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Goldman W, McCulloch J, Sturm R: Costs and use of mental health services before and after managed care.Health Affairs 1999; 17:67–78.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ma CA, McGuire TG: Costs and incentives in a behavioral health carve-out.Health Affairs 1998; 17:53–69.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Frank RG, McGuire TG: Savings from a Medicaid carve-out for mental heath and substance abuse services in Massachusetts.Psychiatric Services 1997; 48:1147–1152.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Buck JA, Stein M, Teich JL, et al: Behavioral health benefits in employer-sponsored health plans, 1997.Health Affairs 1999; 17:67–78.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Health Care Plan Design and Cost Trends—1988 through 1997. Washington: Hay Group, May 1998.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    The Health Care Financing Review: Medicare and Medicaid Statistical Supplement, 1998. Pub. No. 03409. Baltimore, MD: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 1998.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kessler RC, Walters EE, Forthofer MS: The social consequences of psychiatric disorders, III: Probability of marital stability.American Journal of Psychiatry 1998; 155(8):1092–1096.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Frank RG, Gertler P: Mental health and marital stability.International Journal of Law & Psychiatry 1991; 14(4):377–386.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Association of Behavioral Healthcare Management 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of PittsburghPittsburgh

Personalised recommendations