The Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research

, Volume 26, Issue 4, pp 390–399

Who leaves managed behavioral health care?



The growth of managed care and the possibility of biased enrollment and disenrollment rates have raised concerns about cost shifting. This article analyzes the duration of continuous enrollment in a managed behavioral health organization among members with and without behavioral health care utilization and among members with different mental health conditions. Eleven large employers with more than 250,000 members who are enrolled in managed behavioral health plans are studied. Compared to managed care 10 years ago, the rate of disenrollment among patients with depression appears to have dropped. Moreover, there appear few differences in disenrollment among users and nonusers of behavioral health services, except for employees for whom coverage is linked to job performance. However, patients with substance abuse problems or severe types of disorders are significantly more likely to disenroll than patients with less severe problems.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Sturm R, McCulloch J: Mental health and substance abuse benefits in carve-out plans and the Mental Health Parity Act of 1996.Journal of Health Care Finance 1998; 24(3):82–92.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Health Care Plan Design and Cost Trends—1988–1997. Washington, DC: Hay Group, 1998.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Frank RG, McGuire TG: Parity for mental health and substance abuse care under managed care.Journal of Mental Health Policy and Economics 1998; 1(4):153–160.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Libertoff K:Fighting for Parity in an Age of Incremental Health Care Reform. Vermont Association for Mental Health, 1999.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Newcomer R, Preston S, Harrington C: Health plan satisfaction and risk of disenrollment among HMO and fee-for-service recipients.Inquiry 1996; 33:144–154.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hellinger FJ: Selection bias in HMOs and PPOs: A review of the evidence.Inquiry 1995; 32:135–142.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Morgan RO, Virnig BA, DeVito CA, et al.: The Medicare-HMO revolving door—The healthy go in and the sick go out.New England Journal of Medicine 1997; 337:169–175.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Sturm R, McGlynn E, Meredith LS, et al.: Switches between prepaid and fee-for-service health systems among depressed outpatients: Results from the Medical Outcomes Study.Medical Care 1994; 32(9):917–929.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Sturm R, Jackson C, Meredith LS, et al.: Mental health care utilization in prepaid and fee-for-service plans among depressed patients in the medical outcomes study.Health Services Research 1995; 30(2):319–340.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    McFarland BH, Johnson RE, Hornbrook MC: Enrollment duration, service use, and costs of care for severely mentally ill members of a health maintenance organization.Archives of General Psychiatry 1996; 53:938–944.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Schlesinger M, Dorwart R, Hoover C, et al.: The determinants of dumping: A national study of economically motivated transfers involving mental health care.Health Service Research 1997; 32(5):561–90.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Oss ME, Drissel AB, Clary J:Managed Behavioral Health Market Share in the United States, 1997–1998. Gettysburg, PA: Behavioral Health Industry News, 1997.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Wells KB, Sturm R, Sherbourne CD, et al.:Caring for Depression. Harvard University Press, 1996.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Association of Behavioral Healthcare Management 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.RAND CorporationSanta Monica

Personalised recommendations