“Stakeholder” attitudes over time toward the closing of a state hospital

  • Bernice A. Pescosolido
  • Eric R. Wright
  • Saeko Kikuzawa
Article

Abstract

For four groups—patients (N=80), their families or lay caregivers (N=120), hospital workers (N=124), and the public (N=108)—attitudes toward the decision to close the only long-term, urban state hospital are traced over time. Initially, patients were most supportive of the closing decision (65.4%), followed by family members (39.8%), the general public (27.8%), and workers (10.4%). A majority of all groups favored fixing the hospital. Almost half of the clients and more than half of other stakeholders expressed concerns about homelessness. Most attitudes were consistent despite respondents' sociodemographic characteristics. The overall profile of group attitudes remained remarkably stable, although there was a good deal of change in individuals' positions. Public support for fixing the hospital decreased significantly, and differences among stakeholders regarding homelessness disappeared. These findings reinforce the importance of ascertaining different constituencies' positions and recognizing the slowly changing response of stakeholders even under massive and successful policy change.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Brown P:The Transfer of Care. Boston, MA: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1985.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Mechanic D:Mental Health and Social Policy. Fourth ed. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon, 1999.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Mechanic D, Rochefort D: A policy of inclusion for the mentally ill.Health Affairs 1992; 11:128–150.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Redick RW, Witkin MJ, Atay JE, Manderscheid RW: Highlights of organized mental health services in 1992 and major national and state trends. In:Mental Health, United States, 1996. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office, 1996, pp. 90–137.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lutterman TC: The state mental health agency profile system. In: Manderscheid RM, Sonnenschein MA (Eds):Mental Health United States 1994. DHHS Pub. No. (SMA)94-3000. Washington DC: Government Printing Office, 1994, pp. 165–187.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gronfein WP: Incentives and intentions in mental health policy: A comparison of medicaid and the CMHC program.Journal of Health and Social Behavior 1985; 22:192–206.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Issac RJ, Armat VC:Madness in the Streets: How Psychiatry and the Law Abandoned the Mentally Ill. New York: Free Press, 1990.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lamb HR: What did we really expect from deinstitutionalization?Hospital and Community Psychiatry 1981; 32:105–109.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Okin RL: The future of state hospitals: Should there be one?American Journal of Psychiatry 1983; 140:577–581.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gralnick P: Build a better state hospital: Deinstitutionalization has failed?Hospital and Community Psychiatry 1985; 36:38–45.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Holley HL, Hodges P, Jeffers B: Moving psychiatric patients from hospital to community: Views of patients, providers and families.Psychiatric Services 1998; 49:513–517.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    McGrew JH, Wright ER, Pescosolido BA, et al.: Patient outcomes following the closing of a state hospital.Journal of Behavioral Health Services and Research 1999; 26:246–261.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Wright ER, Avirappattu G, Lafuze JE: The family experience of deinstitutionalization: Insights from the closing of Central State Hospital.Journal of Behavioral Health Services and Research 1999; 26:289–304.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Mesch DJ, McGrew JH, Pescosolido BA, et al.: The effects of hospital closure on mental health workers: An overview of employment, mental and physical health, and attitudinal outcomes.Journal of Behavioral Health Services and Research 1999; 26:305–317.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    McDonel EC, Meyer L, DeLiberty R: Implementing state-level mental health policy reforms in Indiana: Closing a state-operated psychiatric hospital and passing major mental health reform legislation.International Journal of Law and Psychiatry 1996; 19:239–264.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Solomon P, Draine J: Family perceptions of consumers as case managers.Community Mental Health Journal 1994; 30:165–175.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    McGrew JH, Wright ER, Pescosolido BA: Closing of a state hospital: an overview and framework for a case study.Journal of Behavioral Health Services and Research 1999; 26:236–245.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Massey DT, Wu L: Three critical views of functioning: Comparison of assessments made by individuals with mental illness, their case managers and family members.Evaluation and Program Planning 1994; 17:1–7.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Association of Behavioral Healthcare Management 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • Bernice A. Pescosolido
    • 1
  • Eric R. Wright
    • 2
  • Saeko Kikuzawa
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of SociologyIndiana UniversityBloomington
  2. 2.the Department of Sociology at Indiana University-Purdue University at IndianapolisUSA
  3. 3.the Department of Sociology at Indiana UniversityBloomington

Personalised recommendations