The assessment of trauma history in women with Co-occurring substance abuse and mental Disorders and a history of interpersonal Violence

  • Gregory J. McHugo
  • Yael Caspi
  • Nina Kammerer
  • Ruta Mazelis
  • Elizabeth Jackson
  • Lisa Russell
  • Colleen Clark
  • Jane Liebschutz
  • Rachel Kimerling
Special Issue

Abstract

The Women, Co-occurring Disorders, and Violence Study (WCDVS) was a large (N=2729) multisite study of the effectiveness of integrated and trauma-informed services for women with substance use and mental health disorders and a history of interpersonal violence (physical or sexual abuse). Study participants' exposure to lifetime and current traumatic events was assessed at baseline and follow-up via in-person interviews. This article describes the choice of the Life Stressor Checklist-Revised (LSC-R) to assess trauma history to meet the WCDVS's research aims and to respond to consumer input. Quantitative data address the breadth and prevalence of potentially traumatic events in the past and current lives of study participants, the formation and properties of summary measures, and test-retest reliability. Qualitative data address tolerance of the instrument by interviewers and respondents and the generalizability of quantitative findings about trauma prevalence. Finally, recommendations are offered for improvements to the WCDVS version of the LSC-R for use in future research.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Mueller D, Edwards D, Yarvis R. Stressful life events and psychiatric symptomatology: change or undesirability?Journal of Health and Social Behavior. 1977;18:307–317.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Parkes C. Psychosocial transitions: a field for study.Social Science and Medicine. 1971;5:101–115.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Parkes C. What becomes of redundant world models? A contribution to the study of adaptation to change.British Journal of Medical Psychology. 1975;48:131–137.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Briere J. Psychological assessment of child abuse effects in adults. In: Wilson JP, Keane TM, eds.Assessing Psychological Trauma and PTSD. New York: The Guilford Press; 1997:43–68.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Goodman LA, Thompson KM, Weinfurt K, et al. Reliability of reports of violent victimization and posttraumatic stress disorder among men and women with serious mental illness.Journal of Traumatic Stress. 1999;12:587–599.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Mueser KT, Salyers MP, Rosenberg SD, et al. Psychometric evaluation of trauma and posttraumatic stress disorder assessments in persons with severe mental illness.Psychological Assessment. 2001;13:110–117.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kilpatrick DG, Saunders BE, Amick-McMullan A, et al. Victim and crime factors associated with the development of crime-related post-traumatic stress disorder.Behavior Therapy. 1989;20:199–214.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Koss MP. The hidden rape victim: personality, attitudinal, and situational characteristics.Psychology of Women Quarterly. 1985;9:193–212.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Wolfe J, Kimerling R. Gender issues in the assessment of posttraumatic stress disorder. In: Wilson JP, Keane TM, eds.Assessing Psychological Trauma and PTSD. New York: Guilford; 1997:192–238.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Brown PJ, Stout RL, Mueller T. Substance use disorder and posttraumatic stress disorder comorbidity: addiction and psychiatric treatment rates.Psychology of Addictive Behaviors. 1999;13:115–122.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gavrilovic J, Lecic-Tosevski D, Knezevic G, et al. Predictors of posttraumatic stress in civilians 1 year after air attacks: a study of Yugoslavian students.Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease. 2002;190:257–262.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kimerling R, Calhoun KS, Forehand R, et al. Traumatic stress in HIV-infected women.AIDS Education and Prevention. 1999;11:321–330.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    McHugo GJ, Kammerer N, Jackson EW, et al. Women, Co-Occurring Disorders, and Violence Study: evaluation design and study population.Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment. 2005;28:91–107.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Strauss A, Corbin J.Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques. Newbury Park, Calif: Sage; 1990.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Becker MA, Noether CD, Larson MJ, et al. Characteristics of women engaged in treatment for trauma and co-occurring disorders: findings from a national multi-site study.Journal of Community Psychology. In press.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data models.Biometrics. 1977;33:159–174.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Grove WM, Andreason NC, McDonald-Scott P, et al. Reliability studies of psychiatric diagnosis.Archives of General Psychiatry. 1981;38:408–413.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    McGraw KO, Wong SP. Forming inferences about some intraclass correlation coefficients.Psychological Methods. 1996;1:30–46.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Newman E, Walker EA, Gefland A. Assessing the ethical costs and benefits of trauma-focused research.General Hospital Psychiatry. 1999;21:187–196.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© National Council for Community Behavioral Healthcare 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gregory J. McHugo
    • 1
  • Yael Caspi
    • 2
  • Nina Kammerer
    • 3
  • Ruta Mazelis
    • 4
    • 5
  • Elizabeth Jackson
    • 6
  • Lisa Russell
    • 7
  • Colleen Clark
    • 8
  • Jane Liebschutz
    • 9
  • Rachel Kimerling
    • 10
  1. 1.NH-Dartmouth Psychiatric Research CenterLebanon
  2. 2.the Department of PsychiatryRambam Medical CenterHaifaIsrael
  3. 3.the Department of Anthropology at Brandeis UniversityWaltham
  4. 4.Carollton
  5. 5.Sidran InstituteCarrollton
  6. 6.the Sheps Health Services Research Center, UNC-Chapel HillChapel Hill
  7. 7.ETR AssociatesScotts Valley
  8. 8.the University of South Florida/FMHITampa
  9. 9.Boston Medical CenterBoston
  10. 10.the National Center for PTSD, Palo Alto VA Health Care System (352-117MPD)Menlo Park

Personalised recommendations