Journal of Religion and Health

, Volume 22, Issue 4, pp 322–333 | Cite as

The role of religious values in coping with cancer

  • Marvin W. Acklin
  • Earl C. Brown
  • Paul A. Mauger


The relationship between transcendent meaning attribution, religious orientation, and psychological well-being was studied in cancer and noncancer patients to test the hypotheses that intrinsic religious values and life meaning enhance coping and well-being during the course of the life-threatening illness. Subjects were 44 patients receiving medical treatment for cancer and noncancer medical conditions. In the cancer group, higher levels of attributed life meaning were positively linked with intrinsic religious orientation, and associated with lower levels of despiar, anger-hostility, and social isolation. Cancer patients scored higher than noncancer patients on depersonalization, suggesting the presence of psychic numbing in response to their illness. Noncancer group results were characterized by positive correlations between the two groups in coping styles and salience of life meaning attribution. A rationale for the observed differences in coping styles between the two groups is presented, highlighting perceived life threat as a key differentiating variable.


Cancer Patient Medical Treatment Medical Condition Social Isolation Coping Style 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Choron, J.C.,Death and Western Thought. New York, Collier Press, 1963; Grof, S., and Halifax, J.,The Human Encounter with Death. New York, E. P. Dutton, 1978.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ring, K.,Life at Death: A Scientific Investigation of the Near-Death Experience. New York, Coward, McCann, & Geoghen, 1980.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Frankl, V.,The Unconscious God. New York, Simon & Schuster, 1978.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kotchen, T., “Existential Mental Health: An Empirical Approach”,Individual Psychology, 1960,16, 174–181.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Noyes, R., “The Experience of Dying”,Psychiatry, 1972,35, 174–184.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lifton, R. J.,The Broken Connection: On Death and the Continuity of Life. New York, Simon & Schuster, 1979.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Allport, G., and Ross, J. M., “Personal Religious Orientation and Prejudice”,Personality and Social Psychology, 1967,5, 4, 432–443.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Allport, G., “Behavioral Science, Religion, and Mental Health”,J. Religion and Health. 1963,2, 3, 187–197.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hunt, R. A., and King, M., “The Intrinsic-Extrinsic Concept: A Review and Evaluation,”J. Scientific Study of Religion, 1971,10, 4, 339–356; Spilka, B., and Minton, B., “Defining Personal Religion: Psychometric, Cognitive, and Instrumental Dimensions”. Paper delivered at the convention of the Society for the Scientific Study of Religion, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, October, 1975; Batson, C.D., “Religion as Prosocial: Agent or Doubleagent,”J. Scientific Study of Religion, 1976,15, 29–45.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Sanders, C.; Mauger, P. A.; and Strong, P.,A Manual for the Grief Experience Inventory. Tampa, Center for Applied Gerontology, 1979.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
  12. 12.
    Lifton,op. cit., p. 17. Also Lifton,the Life of the Self. New York, Simon and Schuster, 1976. pp. 79–80.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Alexander, I. E., and Alderstein, A. M., “Death and Religion.” In Feifel, H., ed.,The Meaning of Death. New York, McGraw-Hill, 1959.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Weisman, A. D.,On Dying and Denying: A Psychiatric Study of Terminality. New York, Behavioral Publications, 1972.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Allport and Ross,op. cit. “, p. 438–442.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Mauger, P.: Simpson, D.; and Adkinson, D., “The Assertiveness and Aggressiveness of Affirming Christians Versus Nonreligious Persons.” Unpublished manuscript. Georgia State University, 1979.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Weisman, A. D.,Coping with Cancer. New York. McGraw-Hill, 1979.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    —, “Psychosocial Considerations in Terminal Care.” In Schoenburg, R.; Carr, A. C.; Peretz, D.; and Kutscher, A. D., eds.,Psychosocial Aspects of Terminal Care. New York, Columbia University Press, 1972.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hackett, T., and Weisman, A. D., “Reactions to the Imminence of Death.” In Grosser, G. H.: Wechsler, H.; and Greenblatt, M., eds.,The Threat of Impending Disaster, Cambridge, Mass., MIT Press, 1964, 300–311.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Cohen, F., and Lazarus, R. S., “Active Coping Processes, Coping Dispositions and Recovery from Surgery,”Psychosomatic Medicine, 1973,35, 375–389; Cohen, F., and Lazarus, R.S., “Coping with the Stresses of Illness.” In Stone, G., ed.,Health Psychology. San Francisco, Jossey-Bass, 1980; Lazarus, R. S., “Positive Denial: The Case for Not Facing Reality.”Psychology Today, November, 1979, 44–60.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Allport, G.,The Individual and his Religion. New York, MacMillan Company, 1950, p. 142.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Institutes of Religion and Health 1983

Authors and Affiliations

  • Marvin W. Acklin
    • 1
  • Earl C. Brown
    • 1
  • Paul A. Mauger
    • 1
  1. 1.Georgia State UniversityAtlanta

Personalised recommendations